Slickline e Logging

A member of the DELEUM Group
Info Sharing
Production Logging
Casing
Inspection
Info Sharing - Content

Intro
o Company profile
o Job Statistics
Casing Inspection.
o MIT (Tool info).
o Pressure force to tubing wall.
o Spacing (gap between fingers).
o Calibration & Jig).
o Example problem (summary).
o Analysis (Modal Line method).
o MITView 3D Software.
o Case Studies.
1. MIT – Collapsed tubing.
2. MIT – Drilling wear.
3. MIT – Scale deposition & remedial work.
4. MIT – Perforated pup.
5. MIT – Completion item (X-Nipple).
6. MIT – SCSSV.
7. MIT – SPM (Side Pocket Mandrel.
8. MIT – SSD (Sliding door).
9. MIT – Seal assy/packer.
10. MIT – Completion item (XN-Nipple).
11. MIT – Multiple holes.
12. MIT – Line damage.
13. MIT – Scale.
14. MIT – Seal assy/Packer.
15. MIT – Multiple holes.
16. MIT – Scale buildup.
17. MIT – Workover well (#1).
18. MIT – Workover well (#2).
Info Sharing - Content (cont’d)

Production Logging .
o Why Production Logging/Objective.
o Sensors/equipment for Conventional MPLT.
o Spinners & Diverter Basket Tool (DBT).
o Spinner and principal of operation.
o Capacitance and principal of operation.
o Density and principal of operation.
o MPLT – Toolstring Config.
o Case Studies.
o Case Study #1 – Turbulence.
o Case Study #2 – ADF (interpretation without spinner).
o Case Study #3 – Cross Flow #1(during SI).
o Case Study #4 – Cross Flow #2 (in both modes).
o Case Study #5 – Leaking (plug).
o Case Study #6 – Channelling.
o Case Study #7 – Radioactive scale from GR.
o Case Study #8 – Hot zone and water entry.
o Case Study #9 – Capacitance and Density.
o Lesson Learned.
o Lesson 1 – Lift calculation.
o Lesson 2 – Battery estimation.
o Lesson 3 – Spinner calculations.
o Lesson 4 – Spinner blade (mechanical/debris).
Info Sharing - Content (cont’d)

MAPS (Array PL).
o Tool introduction.
o Capacitance Array Tool.
o Resistance Array Tool.
o Spinner Array Tool.
Standard Operating Procedure

o Review
Company Profile
Deleum Oilfield Services Sdn. Bhd.
o Subsidiaries of Deleum Group.

o Establishment in 1982 formerly known as Delcom Oilfield Services Sdn. Bhd.
o Main services:
 Slickline operation.
 Wellhead Maintenance.
 EMR survey.
 MIT.
 MPLT.
 MAPS (new product).
MPLT Jobs Statistic (SKO and SBO)

4
2 SKO
SBO
0
2009 2010 2011 2012
MIT Jobs Statistic (SKO & SBO)

15
14
13
12
11
10
8
SKO SBO
7
0
2009 2010 2011 2012
Casing Inspection - Multifinger Imaging Tool
o Battery powered.
o Memory mode/SRO.
o No need correlation survey.
o Various type of centraliser tools and knuckle.
o MIT with 24 fingers (standard & extended).
o 1.75” to 7” ID.
o Resolution 0.003” (0.076mm).
o Accuracy: +/- 0.02” (0.508mm).
o All downhole tools with 1-11/16” OD, 177

degC and 15Kpsi.
Multifinger Imaging Tool - MIT
The MIT tools have been designed so as to impart minimal

finger pressure yet still obtain high accuracy data.
The finger pressure is less than 1lb (0.5 Kg)
Plastic Lined Tubing sectioned after logging with MIT
Trials with the tool during the

design phase show that plastic
lined tubing is not damaged.
The minor striations are due to a
very fine deposition of scale in the
tubing .
MIT - Spacing
Multifinger Imaging Tools gaps between fingers in different well/completion sizes.

MIT - Calibration
7” ring
6-1/2” ring
5-1/2” ring
4-1/2” ring
3-1/2” ring
2-1/2” ring
2” ring
MIT - Calibration
MIT - Calibration
7” ring
6-1/2” ring
5-1/2” ring
4-1/2” ring
3-1/2” ring
2-1/2” ring
2” ring
MIT - Example Problem

SCALE BUILDUP
LANDING IS CHOKING FLOW
NIPPLE
CORROSION
Tubing
Wall
SEAL BORE
HOLE IN TUBING CONFIRMATION DIMENSIONS OF

DOWNHOLE COMPLETION ITEM
RING DAMAGE DUE TO TURBULENCE LOW ORDER

CAUSED BY LANDING NIPPLE MILLING OR DRILLING DETONATIONS
DAMAGE
BLOCKED
PERFORATIONS
LANDING
THINNING OF THE WALL HAS REDUCED
NIPPLE
TUBULAR BURST PRESSURE
MAP PERFORATIONS
MIT - Analysis (Modal line method)
Restriction / Projection
Coupling
Region
Lower Coupling Region
(analysed with greater tolerance for
If we analysed this distortion)
make-up region Make Up Region

it would appear as Not analysed - visual only
a false hole.
Upper Coupling Region
(analysed with greater tolerance for
Upset distortion)
Modal I.D.
Coupling
Penetration Collar
Modal Line Joint Body
Length to Region
determine modal ID
MITView for MIT

3D Software
Case Studies
MIT
MIT - Collapsed casing
Downhole camera
MIT
Example #1 - Collapsed casing

MIT - DrillingMIT Example - DRILLING WEAR

wear
DHV
MIT
Example #2 - Drilling wear

MIT - Scale deposition & Remedial work
Hole in tubing
Lower Limit of
scale cleanup job
Example #3 - Scale and body damage (lower side).

MIT - Perforated Pup
MITView
MIT finger tacers

Example #4 - Perforated pup
MIT - Completion item (nipple)

‘X’ Nipple
Lock Profile
Seal Bore
CROSS SECTION
Example #5 - Completion item (nipple)

MIT – SCSSV
Example #6 – TRSCSSV 3D View

MIT – Side Pocket Mandreal
Example #7 – Side Pocket Mandrel 3D View

MIT – Sliding Side Door
Example #8 – Sliding Sleeve Door 3D View

MIT – Seal Assy/Packer
Example #9 – Packer 3D View

MIT – Nipple
Example #10 – XN-Nipple 3D View

MIT – Multiple holes
Example #11 – Semarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTF-80L)

MIT – Line damage
Example #12 – Samarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTD-38)

MIT – Scale
Example #13 – Samarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTD-38)

MIT – Seal assy/packer (corroded)
Example #14 – Samarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTF-80L)

MIT – Multiple holes
Example #15 – Injection Well 3D Example on Corroded Tubing

MIT – Scale Buildup
Example #16 – Injection Well 3D Example on Scale Buildup

MIT - MITdata & Actual tubing
Example #17 - Workover well #1.



Production Logging - MPLT
o Battery powered.
o Memory mode/SRO.
o GR/CCL for correlation survey.
o Various type of centraliser tools and knuckle joint.
o Various type of spinners (always with back-up).
o SCT capacitance.
o Radioactive and non-radioactive density tools.
o All downhole tools with 1-11/16” OD, 177 degC
and 15Kpsi.
Why Production Logging
Reasons for PLT.

o Water Problems.
o Production Profiling.
o Excessive Gas Problem.
o Injection Profiling.
Aims.
o To maximise the ultimate oil/gas recovery.
o To justify the cost remedial work or even the
development of the entire field.
MPLT - Sensors
MPLT - Spinners
Spinner blades (casing)
Fullbore spinner (caged)
Continuos Flowmeter
Spinner blades (tubing)

MPLT - Spinners
Spinners: Diverter Basket Tool (DBT).
MPLT - Spinner
• Principle of Operation:
 The spinner action rotates the magnets, which pass

the powered hall effect switches.
 Magnet present – switch closed.
 No magnet – switch open.
 The switches are opened and closed giving 10 pulses

per revolution.
 By counting the switchrate, and the order of closing,

the direction of rotation and the RPS are measured.
MPLT - Capacitance
An annular variable capacitor as the central probe as one plate and the cage as the
other probe. The average dielectric from the mixture fluid governs the rate of
charging the capacitor. Water charge capacitor slowly, thus low frequency like wise
hydrocarbon.
MPLT - Density
Gamma rays are emitted at one end and are detected at the opposite end by
scintillation detector and photomultiplier.
Fluids flow through the cell and attenuates the received count rate in an inverse log
function of the average fluid density.
MPLT - Toolstring Config

With CFB - casing With CFS - tubing
Case Studies
MPLT
Case #1 - Turbulence
Unstabilized/turbulence.
Spinner during 30m/min (cyan) is lower than

20m/min (green).
Case study #1 - Turbulence

Case #2 - Apparent Down Flow

Flowing Log
GR Depth W ell Sk etc h Z Veloc ity matc h Interpretation # 1 QZ I
-20 VAFLOW F1,I1 [m/ min] 60 263 TEMP F1,I1 [°F] 265
-20 VAFLOW Z -> F1,I1 [m/ min] 60 2204.07 QP F1,I1 [psia] 2288.34
0.6 DENR F1,I1 [g/ c c ] 1
... m -7. in 7. 27000 CWH F1,I1 [cps] 30000 -500 B/ D 6000
2730
2740
2750
2760
2770
2780
2790
Negative
2800 spinner
2810
2820
2830
HC entry,
2840 cooling
effect
2850
MPLT logged in 7” casing . Objective is to determine water contribution either top perf and bottom perf. Water cut
is 90% and casing was full with water during shut-in log mode. Flowing mode shows negative flows that might
misinterprete as downflow between top perf to bottom perf
Case study #2 - Apparent Down Flow

Case #2 - Apparent Down Flow (cont’d)
Why this happen?
o Spinner show negative value/ downflow but Temp

and Capacitance tools show flowing up.
o Due to slippage velocity

between producing
Hydrocarbon that flow in the
stagnant water column create
eddying/water fallback.
Case study #2 - Apparent Down Flow

Case #3 - Crossflow #1, SI

Shut-In Log
GR W ell Sk etc h Z Depth Vel matc h Interpretation # 1 QZ T QZ I
-70 VAFLOW S1,SI_1 [ft/ min] 100 128 TEMP S1,SI_1 [°F] 142
VAFLOW Z -> S1,SI_1 [ft/ min] 850 QP S1,SI_1 [psia] 1350
28000 CWH S1,SI_1 [cps] 33000.
-20 GAPI 320-7. in 7. ft
2700 0.01 DENR S1,SI_1 [g/ cc] 1.2 -50 B/ D 550-550 B/ D 250
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
MPLT logged in 2-7/8” tubing . Objective is to determine zonal contribution between

each zone. During shut in mode log, found upward crossflow from bottom perf to
top perf as shown by Vapp and Cap.
Case study #3 - Crossflow during SI

Case #4 – Crossflow in both modes, #2

With thief zone in flowing.
W ell Sk etc h Z Depth Vel matc h QZ T W ell Sk etc h Z Depth Veloc ity matc h QZ T
-70 VAFLOW S1,SI_1 [ft/ min] 100 -80 VAFLOW F2,I1 [ft/ min] 160
-7. in 7. ft
2700 VAFLOW Z -> S1,SI_1 [ft/ min] -50 B/ D 550 -7. in 7. ft
2700 VAFLOW Z -> F2,I1 [ft/ min] -50 B/ D 1000
2800 2800
2900 2900
3000 3000
3100 3100
3200 3200
3300 3300
3400 3400
3500 3500
3600 3600
3700 3700
3800 3800
3900 3900
4000 4000
Shutin mode Flowing mode
From the log, shut-in mode shows crossflow but during flowing, some HC were taking
back into the top perf detected. This is due to the flowing well pressure is more than top
perf reservoir pressure.
Case study #4 - Crossflow (thief zone)
Case #4 – Crossflow in both modes, #2
Finding/conclusion:
• Crossflow is affecting the contribution , and
need to do zone change (close the top SSD) to
obtain max production from the well.
Case study #4 - Crossflow (thief zone)

Case #5 – leaking from plug

Shut-In Flowing
W ell Sk etcZh Depth Veloc ity matc h QZ T
VAFLOW S1,S1 [m/ min] W ell Sk etc h Z D epth Veloc ity matc h QZ T
... m ... -500 B/ D 7000 VAFLOW F1,F1 [m/ min]
... m ... -1000 B/ D 13000
2600
2600
2700
2700
2800
Vapp shows
2800
flow below
2900
packer
2900
Packer 3000
3000
MPLT logged in 5-1/2” monobore . Objective is to determine zonal

contribution between each zone. Logging was performed above the
packer (see attached schematic). From shut-in & flowing passes, found
suspected below packer
Case study #5 - leaking
Case #6 - channeling
Case study #6 - channelling

Case #7 - radioactive scale
• Well was not flowing at optimum

rate due to scale buildup
• Multiple milling with coiled
tubing was performed for scale
cleanup. MIT with Gamma Ray
was performed to check on
tubing condition after milling
and MPLT was done at the end
of coiled tubing campaign to
check on well performance.
• High reading of Gamma Ray API
detected during 1st logging and
decreasing after each milling
run.
Case study #7 – radioactive scale

Case #8 - Hot zone & Water entry

SI FL Water level is 1m higher = SI (3697.54mRKB), FL (3696.43mRKB)
374m/min
21m/min
342m/mi
n
Gas = 15.74 MMscf/D
Condy = 410.10 bbl/D
Water = 40.64 bbl/D
Gas production = 91.2%
Flowing mode.
All of the perforations are producing in this well. As this is a gas well, cooling effect can be seen across both zones due to gas expansion with pressure drop. I-100 is
the highest gas contributor with 15.74MMscf/D. Water level is at 3696.43mdRKB and this is approx 1m higher than in shut-in mode. Gamma Ray ‘Hot’ zones across I-
100 is due to radioactive scale deposition in association with water production. No indication of water entry from I-70.
Case study #8 – Hot zone & Water entry

Case #8 - Hot zone & Water entry (cont’d)

All curves, RED = shut-in, GREEN = flowing Water level is 1m higher = SI (3697.54mRKB), FL (3696.43mRKB)
Gamma Ray
Hot Zone
Shut-in mode.
Both spinners show negative rps in between zones. This is the evidence of cross flow where gas from I-70 going (flowing down at 20m/min) into I-100. It is believed
that only gas cross flowed across these zones. From density, water level is at 3697.54mdRKB. BHT was 279degF.
*Hot zone =
Case study #8 – Hot zone & Water entry
Case #9 – Capacitance and Density

W ell Sk etc h Z Depth FLOW CW H DENR
-5 in 5 ft -10 rps 1227000 cps 34000.0.01 g/ cc 1.1
5100
5200
5300
5400
5500
5600
5700
5800
MPLT was logged in 3-1/2” to 2-7/8” tubing (HWC). Due to well deviation and watercut., Spinner
response different between up and down passes (Due to tool positioning, up passes in water and
down passes in light phase) . Capacitance and Density show unsteady pattern in all passes. The
best passes need to be chosen to match the surface rate and get the best holdup.
Case study #9 – Capacitance and Density

Lesson Learned
o Lesson Learned.
o Lesson 1 – Lift calculation.
o Lesson 2 – Battery estimation.
o Lesson 3 – Spinner calculations.
o Lesson 4 – Spinner blade stuck.
Lesson #1 – Lift calculations

SONDEX LIMITED
LIFT / DRAG CALCULATIONS FOR PRODUCTION LOGGING OPERATIONS
Surface pressure 238.7 psia Well Deviation 60 degrees

Pressure at toolstring 1801 psia Tubing ID 2.992 ins
Calc. D/Hole density gas 0.105 g/cc Casing ID or next ID 7 ins
Downhole density water: 0.96 g/cc Tool OD 1.875 ins
Surface Oil API 41.1 Degrees PLT Tool Length 5 ft
Downhole Temperature 237 Deg F Wireline OD 0.125 ins
Calc. D/Hole Density oil 0.755 g/cc Tubing depth 8455 ft
Gas Specific Gravity 0.800 Air=1 Toolstring Depth 8370 ft (in tubing)
Surface gas flowrate 910 mscfd Line wt/1000ft in air 25 lbs
Surface oil flowrate 803 bopd Toolstring wt in air 100 lbs
Surface water flowrate 3659 bwpd Press control / wire friction 25 lbs
Oil Soln. GOR at Pwf. 434 scf/bbl Line Friction Factor 0.0035
Bo, Formn. Vol. factor oil 1.313 RB/STB Surface pull on line 20 lbs
Results: Friction Factors:
Net upward force on wire: -19 Lbs 7/32 E-Line use 0.007
Net downward force on tool: 44 Lbs Slickline use 0.0035
Net downward force of system: 26 Lbs Toolstring: 0.0035
Summation:
Positive (Downward) Forces: Lbs Counter Forces: Lbs
Line pull at surface -20.0
Wellhead Press: -2.9
Press control friction: -25.0
Line weight deviated less bouyancy: 77.1 Lift on line: -47.7
Tool weight deviated less bouyancy: 45.3 Lift on tools: -1.2
Total: 122.4 Total: -96.8
Lesson #1 – Lift calculation

Lesson #2 – Battery estimation
Effect - Data are not recorded during logging operation and even worse for MIT tools, the finger may
broken when rig down.
Clarification - The battery estimation should be done prior to commence the job and used battery
should be labeled.
Lesson #2 – Battery estimation

Lesson #3 – Spinner calculations
Effect - The spinner data is not reliable and invalid interpretation result.
Clarification - The spinner estimation should be done prior to commence the job.
Lesson #3 – Spinner calculations
Lesson #4 – Spinner blade (intermittent)

Surface test
- Both spinners working good.
RIH
- 1 of spinners stuck.
FGS and surface

- Back to normal.
Lesson #2 - Spinner blade stuck

Break
Production Logging - MAPS
 12 capacitance probes.
o Capacitance Array Tool (CAT)
o Spinner Array Tool (SAT)
 6 small turbines.
o Resistance Array Tool (RAT)

 12 resistant probes.
Production Logging - MAPS

MAPS - CAT
• Help identify fluid phases in high deviation and horizontal wells
• 12 miniature sensors located in flexible bowsprings
• Complete 3D imagings of the holdups
The tool is 1 11/16” OD and has 12 micro-capacitance

sensors deployed on bowsprings which follow the ID of
the casing.
MAPS - CAT
CAT- Principle of Operation

Principle of operation:
 Oil, gas and water have its own dielectric properties which means when it surround the 12 probes of
the CAT, it will govern the frequency of oscillation of a feedback circuit.
 Since the probes has slightly different responses, the raw data is normalized from original frequency
to fractional response where gas = 0, oil = 0.2 and water = 1.0
 If there is mixture surrounding the probes, a response chart is used to convert the normalized
reading to holdup.
MAPS - CAT
MAPS - RAT
Insulator
• Help identify water holdup profile in the Approx 1.5mm
entire wellbore
Shield
• Differentiate water (conductive) with
hydrocarbon(non conductive)
• 12 miniature sensors located in flexible
bowsprings Probe
• Complete 3D imagings of the holdups l Water bubble connects l Oil bubble covers and
two tips and conducts insulates tip of probe
= Low Resistivity = High Resistivity
Shield
Will give holdup
of different phases
in bubble flow.
Probe
The tool is 1 11/16” OD and has 12 micro-resistivity

probes deployed on bowsprings which follow the ID of
the tubing / casing.
MAPS - RAT
RAT - Holdup Calculation
Localised holdup
is the ratio of conducting to
non-conducting.
May need a scaling factor
MAPS - RAT
MAPS - SAT
Will give velocities of different phases in stratified or
segregated flow.
• Help determine fluid velocity around the wellbore.

• Differentiate water (conductive) with hydrocarbon(non
conductive).
• 6 miniature turbines mounted on flexible bowsprings
• Output- Direction and speed of spinner.
1 11/16” or 2 1/8” tool with six

jeweled bearing micro-
spinners deployed
on bowsprings
MAPS - SAT
SAT - Sensors positioning
• Sensors positioned around the circumference on

the well bore.
• Identification and velocity measurement for each

phase
MAPS - SAT
SAT – Principle of Operation

Principle of operation:
Hall Effect Sensors.
The Hall effect sensors are integrated circuits, which monitor the magnetic field of the magnets. The
output of the sensors are switched to ground when the magnetic field passes a certain threshold and
thus create a pulse each pass. As there are 3 magnets and Hall effect sensors, 3 pulses will be generated
per revolution. The sequence of the pulses, generated by the sensors determine the flow direction, i.e.
sequence 1-2-3-1 is positive and sequence 3-2-1-3 is negative.
MAPS - SAT
MAPS - CATView
Logging Station – CATview software (Gas = Yellow, Oil = Red, Water = Blue)
Intermittent Slug Flow
MAPS - CATView
MAPS - MAPView
Three Phases - Gas Oil and Water
Oil and Water Production
Cylinder Wall - Phase Type Arrow and Mesh- Phase Velocities

MAPS - MAPView
MAPS - MAPView
Flow loop Comparison – Oil & Water
MAPview
Red: Oil
Blue: Water
Observe some fallback of water on the low side.
MAPS - MAPView
MAPS - MAPView
Flow loop Comparison – Gas & Water
MAPview
Yellow: Gas
Blue: Water
Slugs of water lifted up with gas. Observe some

fallback of water on the low side.
MAPS - MAPView
Field Log - RAT

Density not run due to low density contrast between fresh water and heavy oil.
Capacitance Curve does not

show true holdup profile.
Fluid Velocity:
Top 130 ft/min
Middle 70 ft/min
Bottom 0 ft/min
RAT Holdup:
Top 0.80
Middle 0.88
Bottom 1.00
Individual Sensor Resistivity

0 = 100% (O), 1 = 100% (W)
Average RAT Holdup Water Resistance Sensor 2 Oil Resistance Sensor 2

‘Spikes’ are Reacting to
Perf Zonal Water Water Contribution Zonal Oil Oil Contribution Water Cut Oil bubbles.
Depths STBPD % STBPD % %
TOP 436 43 173 59 72
BOTTOM 584 57 119 41 83 MAPS - MAPView
MAPS - Deployment
Well does not have to be horizontal.

 MAPS may be deployed in deviated wells, to investigate
hydrocarbons running on the high side of the well.
 As the MAPS tools are centralised, the orientation of the
tool is not a concern.
 All tools have a high side indicator and are locked into
alignment.
MAPS - Deployment
MAPS – Repositioning
• Spacer Rings are available to limit bowspring travel and reduce contact with the borehole wall in an open hole
completion
• Useful in Open Hole completions and in completions with wax / scale / corrosion.
MAPS - Deployment
MAPS
MAPS in Horizontal well.
Because of high flow the well stream Stratified Flow (SAT, CAT and Oil bubbles squeezing through
is mixed (SAT, RAT, PLT). RAT). at the top (SAT, CAT and RAT)
Note:
The Spinner Array Tool and Resistivity Array Tool are also suitable for deviated and vertical wells.
MAPS - Horizontal

Slickline e Logging

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Slickline e Logging

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A member of the DELEUM Group

Info Sharing - Content

Info Sharing - Content (cont’d)

Info Sharing - Content (cont’d)

Standard Operating Procedure

o Subsidiaries of Deleum Group.

MPLT Jobs Statistic (SKO and SBO)

MIT Jobs Statistic (SKO & SBO)

Casing Inspection - Multifinger Imaging Tool

o All downhole tools with 1-11/16” OD, 177

Multifinger Imaging Tool - MIT

The MIT tools have been designed so as to impart minimal

The finger pressure is less than 1lb (0.5 Kg)

Plastic Lined Tubing sectioned after logging with MIT

Trials with the tool during the

Multifinger Imaging Tools gaps between fingers in different well/completion sizes.

MIT - Example Problem

HOLE IN TUBING CONFIRMATION DIMENSIONS OF

RING DAMAGE DUE TO TURBULENCE LOW ORDER

MIT - Analysis (Modal line method)

make-up region Make Up Region

MITView for MIT

MIT - Collapsed casing

Example #1 - Collapsed casing

MIT - DrillingMIT Example - DRILLING WEAR

Example #2 - Drilling wear

MIT - Scale deposition & Remedial work

Example #3 - Scale and body damage (lower side).

MIT - Perforated Pup

MIT finger tacers

MIT - Completion item (nipple)

Example #5 - Completion item (nipple)

Example #6 – TRSCSSV 3D View

MIT – Side Pocket Mandreal

Example #7 – Side Pocket Mandrel 3D View

MIT – Sliding Side Door

Example #8 – Sliding Sleeve Door 3D View

MIT – Seal Assy/Packer

Example #9 – Packer 3D View

Example #10 – XN-Nipple 3D View

MIT – Multiple holes

Example #11 – Semarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTF-80L)

MIT – Line damage

Example #12 – Samarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTD-38)

Example #13 – Samarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTD-38)

MIT – Seal assy/packer (corroded)

Example #14 – Samarang 3D Example on Corroded Tubing (SMJTF-80L)

MIT – Multiple holes

Example #15 – Injection Well 3D Example on Corroded Tubing

MIT – Scale Buildup

Example #16 – Injection Well 3D Example on Scale Buildup

MIT - MITdata & Actual tubing

Example #17 - Workover well #1.

MIT - MITdata & Actual tubing

Example #18 - Workover well #2.

MIT - MITdata & Actual tubing

Example #18 - Workover well #2.

Production Logging - MPLT

Why Production Logging

Reasons for PLT.

Fullbore spinner (caged)

Spinner blades (tubing)