Topic 7 - GROUP TEAM

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Topic 7:

Group and Work Teams

10-1

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
 Distinguish formal vs informal group
 Discuss the reasons people join group
 Identify the five stages of group development
Discuss challenges in group decision making
Identify various types of work team
Discuss how to develop effective team

10-2

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 1
Different Types of Groups

A group is defined as two or more individuals,


interacting and interdependent, who have come
together to achieve particular objectives.
Groups can be either formal or informal.
 Formal groups – those defined by the
organization’s structure.
 Informal groups – alliances that are neither
formally structured nor organizationally
determined. 9-3

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 2
Different Types of Groups
Several characteristics make a social identity important to a
person
 Similarity: tendency of people who have greater
uniformity in values and characteristics to have greater
group identification as well
 Distinctiveness: tendency of in-group members to notice
and emphasize identities that reflect how different they
are from other groups
 Status: tendency of people to link themselves to groups of
higher social standing in an attempt to define themselves
favorably
 Uncertainty reduction: tendency of people to use the
group as a means of understanding who they are and how
they fit into the world
9-4

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 3 Five Stages of
Group Development

9-5

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 3
The Five-Stage Model of Group
Development
Forming Stage
The first stage in group development, characterized
by a great deal of uncertainty about the group’s
purpose, structure, and leadership.

Members are trying to determine what types of


behavior are acceptable.

Stage is complete when


members have begun to think of
themselves as part of a group.
Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 3
…Group Development
(cont’d)
Storming Stage
The second stage in group development,
characterized by intragroup conflict.
Members accept the existence of the group, but
there is resistance to constraints on individuality.
Conflict over who will control the group.

When complete, there will be


a relatively clear hierarchy of
leadership within the group.

Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 3
…Group Development
(cont’d)
Norming Stage
The third stage in group development, characterized
by close relationships and cohesiveness.
There is now a strong sense of group identity and
camaraderie/ friendship

Stage is complete when the group


structure solidifies and the group
has assimilated a common set of
expectations of what defines
correct member behavior.

Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 3
…Group Development
(cont’d)
Performing Stage
The fourth stage in group development, when the
group is fully functional and accepted.
Group energy has moved from
getting to know and understand
each other to performing.

For permanent work groups,


performing is the last stage in
their development.
Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 3
…Group Development
(cont’d)
Adjourning Stage
The final stage in group development for temporary
groups, characterized by concern with wrapping up
activities rather than performance.
For temporary committees, teams,
task forces, and similar groups that
have a limited task to perform, there
is an adjourning stage.
In this stage, the group prepares for
its disbandment .

Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 4Contrast the Strengths and
Weaknesses of Group Decision Making
Strengths of group decision making:
 More complete information and knowledge
 Increased diversity of views
 Increased acceptance of solutions
Weaknesses of group decision making:
 Time consuming
 Conformity pressures
 Dominance of a few members
 Ambiguous responsibility 9-11

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 4Contrast the Strengths and
Weaknesses of Group Decision Making
Effectiveness and efficiency of group decisions:
 Accuracy
 Speed
 Creativity
 Acceptance

9-12

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 4Contrast the Strengths and
Weaknesses of Group Decision Making
Groupthink – situations in which group pressures for
conformity deter the group from critically appraising unusual,
minority, or unpopular views.
 Related to norms
Groupshift – a change between a group’s decision and an
individual decision that a member within the group would
make.
 The shift can be toward either conservatism or greater risk,
but is generally toward a more extreme version of the
group’s original position.
9-13

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 5
Contrast Groups and Teams

10-14

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 5
Five Types of Teams

10-15

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 5
Types of Teams
Problem-Solving Teams
Groups of 5 to 12 employees from the same
department who meet for a few hours each
week to discuss ways of improving quality,
efficiency, and the work environment.

Self-Managed Work Teams


Groups of 10 to 15 people who take on the
responsibilities of their former supervisors.

Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 5
Types of Teams (cont.)
Advantages of self-managed work teams
 Productivity and quality improvements.
 Production flexibility and faster response to technological
change.
 Reduced absenteeism and turnover.
 Improved work attitudes and quality of work life.

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd. 7-17


LO 5
Types of Teams (cont.)
Disadvantages of self-managed work teams
 Structural changes in job classifications and management
levels eliminate the need for first-line supervisors.
 Managers must learn to deal with teams rather than
individuals.
 Supervisors who are displaced by self-managing teams
may feel threatened.

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd. 7-18


LO 5
Self-managed Work Team

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd. 7-19


LO 5
Types of Teams (cont.)
Cross-Functional Teams
Employees from about the same hierarchical level,
but from different work areas, who come together to
accomplish a task.

• Task forces

• Committees

Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 5
Types of Teams (cont.)
Virtual Teams
Teams that use computer
technology to tie together
physically dispersed members
in order to achieve a common
goal.

Characteristics of Virtual Teams


1. The absence of paraverbal and nonverbal cues
2. A limited social context
3. The ability to overcome time and space constraints

Copyright
Copyright©©
2015 Pearson
2015 Education
Pearson Ltd.
Education, Inc.
LO 6 The Characteristics
of Effective Teams

10-22

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 6 The Characteristics
of Effective Teams
Context: What factors determine whether teams are
successful?
 Adequate Resources: A scarcity of resources directly
reduces the ability of the team to perform its job
effectively.
 Leadership and Structure: Teams can’t function if they
can’t agree on who is to do what and ensure all members
share the workload.
 Climate of Trust: Members of effective teams trust each
other and exhibit trust in their leaders.
 Performance Evaluations and Rewards: In addition to
evaluating and rewarding employees for their individual
contributions, management should modify the
traditional, individually oriented evaluation and reward 10-23
system to reflect team performance
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.
LO 6 The Characteristics
of Effective Teams
Team Composition: How should teams be staffed?
 Abilities of members
 Personality: Many of the dimensions identified in the Big Five
personality model have shown to be relevant to team effectiveness.
 Allocating roles
 Diversity: such as age, sex, race, educational level, or length of
service in the organization, is the subject of organizational
demography
 Size of teams: Most experts agree, keeping teams small is a key to
improving group effectiveness. The most effective teams have five
to nine members.
 Member flexibility
 Member preferences: Not every employee is a team player. High
performing teams are likely to be composed of people who prefer 10-24
working as part of a group
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.
LO 6 The Characteristics
of Effective Teams

10-25

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 6 The Characteristics
of Effective Teams
Team Processes
 Common Plan and Purpose: Teams that establish a clear sense of what
needs to be done and how consistently perform better.
 Reflexivity
 Specific Goals: Specific goals facilitate clear communication and help
teams maintain their focus on results. Team goals should be challenging.
 Team Efficacy: Effective teams have confidence in themselves and believe
they can succeed.
 Mental Models: Effective teams share accurate mental models —
organized mental representations of the key elements within a team’s
environment that team members share.
 Conflict Levels: When teams are performing non routine activities,
disagreements about task content (called task conflicts) stimulate
discussion, promote critical assessment of problems and options, and can
lead to better team decisions.
 Social Loafing: Effective teams undermine this tendency by making
members individually and jointly accountable for the team’s purpose,
goals, and approach. 10-26

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 6 The Characteristics
of Effective Teams

10-27

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 6 How Organizations Can
Create Team Players
Creating Team Players
 Selecting: hire team players
 Training: create team players
 Rewarding: incentives to be a good team player

10-28

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


LO 6 When to Use
Individuals Instead of Teams
When not to use teams…
Ask:
 Can the work be done better by one person?
 Does the work create a common goal or purpose?
 Are the members of the group interdependent?

10-29

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


Implications for Managers
When forming employee groups, use larger groups
for fact-finding activities and smaller groups for
action-taking tasks.
 When creating larger groups, you should also
provide measures of individual performance.
To increase employee satisfaction, work on making
certain your employees perceive their job roles the
same way you perceive their roles.
9-30

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


Implications for Managers
Effective teams have common characteristics.
 They have adequate resources, effective
leadership, a climate of trust, and a performance
evaluation and reward system that reflects team
contributions.
 They have individuals with technical expertise as
well as problem-solving, decision-making, and
interpersonal skills, and the right traits, especially
conscientiousness and openness.
10-31

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


Implications for Managers

Effective teams also tend to be small – with fewer


than 10 people, preferably of diverse backgrounds.
 They have members who fill role demands and
prefer to be part of a group.
 The work that members do provides freedom and
autonomy, the opportunity to use different skills
and talents, the ability to complete a whole and
identifiable task or product, and work that has a
substantial impact on others. 10-32

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


Implications for Managers
Effective teams have members who believe in the
team’s capabilities and are committed to a common
plan and purpose, have an accurate shared mental
model of what is to be accomplished, share specific
team goals, maintain a manageable level of conflict,
and show a minimal degree of social loafing.

10-33

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.


Implications for Managers
Because individualistic organizations and societies
attract and reward individual accomplishments, it
can be difficult to create team players in these
environments.
 To make the conversion, management should try
to select individuals who have the interpersonal
skills to be effective team players, provide training
to develop teamwork skills, and reward
individuals for cooperative efforts.
10-34

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education Ltd.

You might also like