Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maintenance of Manpower (Job Design & Motivation)
Maintenance of Manpower (Job Design & Motivation)
Maintenance of Manpower (Job Design & Motivation)
Manpower
Job Design and Motivation
COURSE OUTLINE
1. Organizational Factors:
(a) Work Nature- There are various elements of a job and job design is
required to classify various tasks into a job or a coherent set of jobs. The
various tasks may be planning, executing, monitoring, controlling etc. and all
these are to be taken into consideration while designing a job.
(b) Ergonomics – Ergonomics aims at designing jobs in such a way that the
physical abilities and individual traits of employees are taken into
consideration so as to ensure efficiency and productivity.
(c) Workflow- Product and service type often determines the sequence of
work flow. A balance is required between various product or service processes
and a job design ensures this.
(d) Culture- Organizational culture determines the way tasks are carried out
at the work places. Practices are methods or standards laid out for carrying
out a certain task. These practices often affect the job design especially
when the practices are not aligned to the interests of the union.
Environmental Factors:
Environmental factors affect the job design to a considerable extent.
These factors include both the internal as well as external factors. They
include factor like employee skills and abilities, their availability, and
their socioeconomic and cultural prospects.
Advantages
Disadvantages
a) Avoid Monopoly:
(a) Increases Work Burden:
Job rotation helps to avoid monopoly of job and
enable the employee to learn new things and Job enlargement increases the work of the
therefore enjoy his job. employee and not every company provides
incentives and extra salary for extra work.
(b) Provides an Opportunity to Broaden One’s Therefore the efforts of the individual may
Knowledge: remain unrecognized.
Due to job rotation the person is able to learn (b) Increasing Frustration of the Employee:
different job in the organization this broadens
his knowledge. In many cases employees end up being frustrated
because increased activities do not result in
(c) Avoiding Fraudulent Practice: increased salaries.
In an organization like bank jobs rotation is (c) Problem with Union Members:
undertaken to prevent employees from doing
any kind of fraud i.e., if a person is handling a Many union members may misunderstand job
particular job for a very long time he will be enlargement as exploitation of worker and may
able to find loopholes in the system and use take objection to it.
them for his benefit and indulge (participate) in
fraudulent practices job rotation avoids this.
2. Job Enlargement:
Job enlargement involves combining various activities at the same level in the
organization and adding them to the existing job. It increases the scope of the
job. It is also called the horizontal expansion of job activities.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
(a) Variety of Skills: (a) Increases Work Burden:
Job enlargement helps the organization to Job enlargement increases the work of the
improve and increase the skills of the employee employee and not every company provides
due to organization as well as the individual incentives and extra salary for extra work.
benefit. Therefore the efforts of the individual may
remain unrecognized.
(b) Improve Earning Capacity:
(b) Increasing Frustration of the Employee:
Due to job enlargement the person learns many
new activities. When such people apply for jobs In many cases employees end up being frustrated
to other companies they can bargain for more because increased activities do not result in
salary. increased salaries.
(c) Wide Range of Activities: (c) Problem with Union Members:
Job enlargement provides wide range of Many union members may misunderstand job
activities for employees. Since a single employee enlargement as exploitation of worker and may
handles multiple activities the company can try take objection to it.
and reduce the number of employees. This
reduces the salary bill for the company.
Job Enrichment:
Job enrichment is a term given by Fredrick Herzberg. According to him, a few
motivators are added to a job to make it more rewarding, challenging and interesting.
According to Herzberg, the motivating factors to an existing job to make it more
interesting.
The motivating factors can be:
(a) Giving more freedom.
(b) Encouraging participation.
(c) Giving employees the freedom to select the method of working.
(d) Allowing employees to select the place at which they would like to work.
(e) Allowing workers to select the tools that they require on the job.
(f) Allowing workers to decide the layout of plant or office.
Job enrichment gives lot of freedom to the employee but at the same time increases
the responsibility. Some workers are power and responsibility hungry. Job enrichment
satisfies the needs of employees.
JOB ENRICHMENT
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
(a) Interesting and Challenging Job: (a) Job enrichment is based on the assumptions that
workers have complete knowledge to take decisions
When a certain amount of power is given to the
and they have the right attitude. In reality this might
employees it makes the job more challenging for them,
we can say that job enrichment is a method of employee not be the case due to which there can be problems
empowerment. in working.
(b) Improves Decision-Making: (b) Job enrichment has negative implications i.e.,
along with usual work decision-making work is also
Through job enrichment we can improve the decision- given to the employees and not many may be
making ability of the employee by asking him to decide comfortable with this.
on factory layout, method and style of working.
(c) Superiors may feel that power is being taken
(c) Identifies Future Managerial Calibre:
away from them and given to the junior’s. This might
When we provide decision-making opportunities to lead to ego problems.
employees, we can identify which employee is better
than other in decision-making and mark employees for (d) This method will only work in certain situations.
further promotion. Some jobs already give a lot of freedom and
responsibility; this method will not work for such
(d) Identifies Higher Order Needs of Employees: jobs.
This model identifies higher order needs of the employee. (e) Some people are internally dissatisfied with the
Abraham Maslow’s theory of motivation speaks of these organization. For such people no amount of job
higher order needs, e.g., ego and esteemed needs, self-
enrichment can solve the problem.
actualization etc. These needs can be achieved through
job enrichment.
Scientific management, developed by Frederick W. Taylor, gave rise to the engineering approach to job design. The
key element of this approach was the ‘task idea’ that led to job specialization. The ‘task idea’ is the work of every
workman that is fully planned and laid out by the management, at least one day in advance.
The workers are given specific instructions on to what is to be done, how it is to be done and the exact time to be
taken to complete the work. This results in the worker using none of his metal or intellectual skills and just doing
what he has been asked to do.
(ii) Mechanical Pacing – All the workers had to work continuously at a predetermined pace. The workers could not take any
breaks nor relax. The pace of work was the same for all the employees, and differences in individual capabilities were not
taken into account.
(iii) No End Product – Due to over-specialization, employees were manufacturing bits and pieces and not turning out any
identifiable end product. Hence, they had little pride or enthusiasm in their work.
(iv) Little Social Interaction – Employees had limited chances of interacting on a casual basis with their co-workers as the
assembly line required constant attention. This made it difficult for employees to build significant social bonds at work.
(v) No Personal Input – Lack of personal control over the job in terms of choosing the methods by which the jobs were to
be performed, the tools that were to be used, the work procedure, or the pace, resulted in employees losing interest in
the job as there was nothing they could improve or change about their jobs.
Human Relations Approach:
The human relations approach introduced a ‘human touch’ to deal with the problem of over-
specialized jobs. Under this approach, over-specialized jobs needed to be redesigned to
become more satisfying and rewarding to the employees. It was felt that the workers have
social needs which necessitate casual interactions with supervisors and co-workers. So, scope
for flexibility had to be introduced in job design.
According to the theory of motivation proposed by Herzberg, there are two factors that
affect the job satisfaction-the motivators and hygiene factors. The hygiene factors help in
tackling dissatisfaction among the workers and preventing a negative job environment. Some
of these factors are the working conditions, organizational policies, interpersonal relations,
pay and job security.
Socio-Technical Approach:
The socio-technical approach to job design is another alternative to the
scientific/engineering approach, which resulted in highly specialized jobs where the
advantages of specialization were gradually negated by its disadvantages, namely,
dissatisfaction and fatigue among the employees.
In the socio-technical approach, both the technical system and the social system are
emphasized. According to this approach, jobs should be designed taking a holistic view of
both physical and social environments. Ideally, this merges the technical needs of the
organization with the social needs of the employees.
Steps to Redesign Job of Employees
These steps are as follows:
1. Identification of Jobs to be Redesigned:
The first step in job redesign is to identify the jobs to be redesigned. Job redesign is not an
automatic process but when any change in contextual variables affecting jobs takes place, it
affects the quality of job performance.
For example, when organization’s information systems are changed from one form to another
form, say from manually-operated to computer-based, this change affects the job
performance of related persons, say accounts clerks. In the new situation, the jobs of
accounts clerks have to be redesigned to suit the new situation. Similar contextual changes
may take place in other jobs.
2. Identification of Contents to be Redesigned:
After identifying the jobs to be redesigned, contents that are to be changed have to be
identified. This is done through the process of job analysis. By undertaking job analysis
process, new job description for each job is prepared which shows the contents of the job as
well as its relationship to other jobs. Simultaneously, job specification for each job is
prepared.
Steps to Redesign Job of Employees
3. Effecting Redesigning:
Based on job description, a job is redesigned. Whenever, there is any change in the nature of
any job because of change in contextual variables, its core dimensions remain the same.
These core dimensions are skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and
feedback. Therefore, redesigning is effected in these dimensions.
4. Evaluating Effect of Redesigning:
When a job is redesigned, it is put in operation on experimental basis. During this period,
attempt is made to evaluate how the redesigned job is facilitating or constraining the job
holder and other jobs with which it is linked. Feedback is received from all the persons
concerned—job holder, his superior, his subordinates, HR professionals concerned and, if
possible, those outsiders who interact with the redesigned job holder. In the light of this
feedback, further redesigning is effected, if required. When everything is satisfactory, the
redesigned job becomes the part of the organization’s jobs.
WHAT IS MOTIVATION?
On the cutting edge of research pertaining to motivation in the workplace is the integration of motivation and creativity.
Essentially, according to Ambrose and Kulik, the same variables that predict intrinsic motivation are associated with creativity.
This is a helpful conclusion in that organizations can measure and influence both creativity and motivation simultaneously.
Further, allowing employees to choose creative and challenging jobs/tasks has been shown to improve motivation. Malmelin
and Virta indicate creating new processes or procedures goes along with the jobs/task. In order to increase creativity, setting
"creativity goals" can positively influence the process, along with allowing more autonomy (i.e., giving employees freedom to
feel/be creative). Other studies have found that team support may enable more creativity in a group setting, also increasing
motivation. Keeping creative employees productive and satisfied could be the key to retaining even the most difficult
employees.
As the workplace is changing to include more group-based systems, researching motivation within these groups is of growing
importance. To date, a great amount of research has focused on the Job characteristic theory and the Goal-setting Theory.
While more research is needed that draws on a broader range of motivation theories, research thus far has concluded several
things: (a) semi-autonomous groups report higher levels of job scope (related to intrinsic job satisfaction), extrinsic
satisfaction, and organizational commitment; and (b) developmentally mature teams have higher job motivation and
innovation. Further, voluntarily formed work teams report high work motivation. Though research shows that appropriate goal-
setting influences group motivation and performance, more research is needed in this area (group goals, individual goals,
cohesiveness, etc.). There are inseparable mediating variables consisting of group cohesiveness, commitment, and
performance. As the workplace environment calls for more and more teams to be formed, research into motivation of teams is
ever-pressing. Thus far, overarching research merely suggests that individual-level and team-level sources of motivation are
congruent with each other. Consequently, research should be expanded to apply more theories of motivation; look at group
dynamics; and essentially conclude how groups can be most impacted to increase motivation and, consequently, performance.
Culture
Organizational cultures can be broken down into three groups: Strong, Strategically Appropriate, and Adaptive. Each has been
identified with high performing organizations and has particular implications on motivation in the workplace.
Strength
The most widely reported effect of culture on performance is that strong cultures result in high performance.The three reasons
for this are goal alignment, motivation, and the resulting structure provided. Goal alignment is driven by the proposed unified
voice that drives employees in the same direction. Motivation comes from the strength of values and principles in such a
A strategically appropriate culture motivates due to the direct support for performance in the market and industry:
"The better the fit, the better the performance; the poorer the fit, the poorer the performance," state Kotter &
Heskett.There is an appeal to the idea that cultures are designed around the operations conditions a firm encounters
although an outstanding issue is the question of adapting culture to changes in the environment.
Adaptability
Another perspective in culture literature asserts that in order for an organization to perform at a high level over a
long period of time, it must be able to adapt to changes in the environment. According to Ralph Kilmann, in such a
culture "there is a shared feeling of confidence: the members believe, without a doubt, that they can effectively
manage whatever new problems and opportunities will come their way." In effect, the culture is infused with a high
degree of self-efficacy and confidence. As with the strong culture, critics point to the fact that the theory provides
nothing in the way of appropriate direction of adaptation that leads to high performance.
Competing Values Framework
Another perspective on culture and motivation comes from the work of Cameron & Quinn and the Competing Values
Framework. They divide cultures into four quadrants: Clan, Adhocracy, Market, Hierarchy, with particular
characteristics that directly affect employee motivation.
Clan cultures are collaborative and driven by values such as commitment, communication, and individual
development. Motivation results from human development, employee engagement, and a high degree of open
communication.
Adhocracy cultures are creative and innovative. Motivation in such cultures arises from finding creative solutions to
problems, continually improving, and empowering agility.
Market cultures focus on value to the customer and are typically competitive and aggressive. Motivation in the
market culture results from winning in the marketplace and creating external partnerships.
And finally, Hierarchy cultures value control, efficiency, and predictability. Motivation in such a culture relies on
effectiveness, capability, and consistency. Effective hierarchy cultures have developed mature and capable processes
which support smooth operations.
Culture has been shown to directly affect organizational performance. When viewed through the lens of accepted
behaviors and ingrained values, culture also profoundly affects motivation. Whether one looks at the type of
culture—strong, strategically appropriate, or adaptive—as Kotter & Heskett do, or at the style of culture—Clan,
Adhocracy, Market, or Hierarchy—as Cameron & Quinn do, the connection between culture and motivation becomes
clear and provides insights into how to hire, task, and motivate employees.
Personality Approach
Personality traits, pre-dispositions, and behaviors can have an outcome on work
motivation. Influences can be conceptualized in the Big Five trait theory (Barrick
& Mount, 1991; John & Srivastava, 1999). The personality theory can characterize
these traits into conscientiousness, agreeableness, extroversion/introversion,
openness to experience, and emotional stability (Stajkovic, Bandura, Locke, Lee,
& Sergent, 2018). There are two types of personalities: Type A and Type B. Type A's
are considered more dominant, aggressive, and work oriented. Type B's are detail
focused, task oriented, and possess higher self-control. Individual perceptions may
differ based on the job stressor or outcome (Day, & Jreige, 2002). Work demands
that reflect on personality attributes can depend on tasks, job complexity,
relationships, and work stress. The personality attributes most important for your
workplace comes down to understanding the organizational work behaviors,
characteristics of the jobs, and future strategies of the company.Personalities can
be an influence on creativity in the workforce and behavioral expectations.