The document discusses the shift in higher education towards experiential learning and the effects of increased centralization of experiential learning programs. It notes that in the late 20th century, reports emphasized skills needed for the workforce. This fueled growth of internships, co-ops, and other experiential learning options. As accreditation focused more on learning outcomes, experiential education became more central. Centralization of programs can increase coordination but may diminish individual program integrity if not carefully implemented. The document advocates for clear definitions, authority structures, and incentives to maximize benefits and protect quality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses the shift in higher education towards experiential learning and the effects of increased centralization of experiential learning programs. It notes that in the late 20th century, reports emphasized skills needed for the workforce. This fueled growth of internships, co-ops, and other experiential learning options. As accreditation focused more on learning outcomes, experiential education became more central. Centralization of programs can increase coordination but may diminish individual program integrity if not carefully implemented. The document advocates for clear definitions, authority structures, and incentives to maximize benefits and protect quality.
The document discusses the shift in higher education towards experiential learning and the effects of increased centralization of experiential learning programs. It notes that in the late 20th century, reports emphasized skills needed for the workforce. This fueled growth of internships, co-ops, and other experiential learning options. As accreditation focused more on learning outcomes, experiential education became more central. Centralization of programs can increase coordination but may diminish individual program integrity if not carefully implemented. The document advocates for clear definitions, authority structures, and incentives to maximize benefits and protect quality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses the shift in higher education towards experiential learning and the effects of increased centralization of experiential learning programs. It notes that in the late 20th century, reports emphasized skills needed for the workforce. This fueled growth of internships, co-ops, and other experiential learning options. As accreditation focused more on learning outcomes, experiential education became more central. Centralization of programs can increase coordination but may diminish individual program integrity if not carefully implemented. The document advocates for clear definitions, authority structures, and incentives to maximize benefits and protect quality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Higher education practices Internships have been part of academic curricula, mostly in professionally oriented disciplines, instructed by faculty for credit. Co-op has been in selected departments, initially identified with engineering, later with liberal arts. In past 30 years expanded to many disciplines. Other forms of experiential learning have been supported in academic departments Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008 Shift in emphasis In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, USA, Canada, Australia and U.K. all produced documents about necessary skills for the workforce. In the U.S., it was the SCANS report (Secretary’s Commission on Necessary Skills) from the Department of Labor. Fueled by industry spending large sums of money to train new hires after graduation from universities, especially in soft skills. (Secretary’s Commission on Advancing Necessary Skills. (1990). SCANS report. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.)
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Shift in emphasis The White Paper on Higher Education focuses on access, learning vs. teaching, and use of technology (Edgerton, R. (1997). White paper on higher education. Pew Charitable Trust: N.J.) Accreditation agencies followed, focusing less on structure and more on student learning outcomes A variety of experiential learning options were created or redesigned to provide external measurement for learning outcomes Institutional commitment, program delivery, reporting structures, definitions, and goals were realigned Experiential Education begins to become central rather than marginalized
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Effect on existing programs Internship coordinators increased in academic disciplines to respond to accreditation requirements. Co-op program staff/faculty started supporting internships, sometimes blurring definitions Career Services started listing internships (and co-op) on websites for access, also blurring definitions. Push for one-stop shopping. Employers began to use terms interchangeably to access students which caused confusion between academic applied learning and student work.
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Defining characteristics/goals Experiential Learning - Experience in a major or course related real-world environment, for the purpose of applying course content and developing academic, work, and/or career competencies (Academic Affairs focus is provision of educational programs) Work experience - Work in a real-world environment for the purpose of developing work and career competencies and preparing for full-time work upon graduation (Career Development focus is provision of services and access)
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Reporting Structures An example is in Service-Learning. In Academic Affairs the focus is on applying course content in service experiences and competency development. In Student Development, it focuses on community service. In a 2003 survey of 50 of the largest universities in the U.S., co-op programs in Academic Affairs averaged 300 participants/semester. Those in Student Development averaged 45 with more than one-third at 0. We must decide what outcomes we want in order to choose the structure that will lead to those outcomes.
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Looking at Outcomes Emphasis on learning outcomes increases research and reviews of research on learning outcomes and educational efficacy of programs National research project among 15 co-op programs on student learning outcomes (Parks, D.K. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Cash, S.H.,2001) Reviews of Research On Co-op, 1988-2003 (Dressler, S. & Keeling, A., 2004)
On Service-Learning,1993-2000 (Eyler, J., Giles, D.E., Stenson,
C.M., & Gray, C.J., 2001).
None done on internships across disciplines as of yet
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Similarities and Differences Similarities in outcomes but differences in focus Both use reflection but differ on issues to be reflected upon. More than half of the personal competencies are developed through both modalities. Personal and Academic outcomes are very similar. Co-op has more Work and Career outcomes and Service-Learning more Social outcomes. Program focus, what questions are asked, may effect outcomes Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008 Academic Similarities There may be greater differences between academic outcomes in academic Co-op programs vs. those in Student Development than there are between academic Co-op programs and Service- Learning programs. Outcome similarities imply that each methodology can be informed and strengthened by each other. Rather than compete, these experiential learning programs can function as collaborative options in the curriculum. Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008 Forms of Experiential Learning Co-op and Internships - centralized and/or decentralized Clinical practice, practica, undergraduate research, independent study - in academic departments Service-Learning - Education College and/or in academic departments, centralized or decentralized Senior design - Engineering Capstone/cornerstone courses - Business Study abroad - International Services Others
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Increased Centralization and Mission Changes Focus on learning outcomes provide consistency between different forms of experiential education. Previously marginalized methods begin to move closer to institutional missions (Carnegie Engagement designation) This environment provides a means to find commonalities based on learning outcomes
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Increased Centralization and Mission Changes Experiential Learning Centers - Co-op, Internships, sometimes Service-Learning, Collaboration - partner on Internships and Service-Learning Other partnerships - Faculty Learning Centers, International Services (CPT) Career Service - Externships, Shadowing, Alumni, Development Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008 Impact on Experiential Learning Programs Benefits Drawbacks Best Practices Other issues
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Benefits Increased coordination/partnership with faculty - can focus on faculty reward system and curricular needs Decreased competition between programs - Both employers and students have information and support to make appropriate and best choices More expansion and less confusion due to increased promotion of all forms of experiential learning - This also protects program integrity Can increase quality across disciplines by unifying assessment
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Drawbacks Integrity and definition can be lost if external forces remove options Resources and effort may be split or diminished Those that take the least effort may grow more rapidly or take precedence, regardless of level of educational benefit if there is lack of manpower Voice for each program may be diminished Skills required may vary between programs so hiring can become more difficult if there is little differentiation of tasks Faculty may divest involvement if they see diminished control
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Best Practices Decide on academic and/or student development focus - impacts on personnel requirements, status, definitions, and outcomes Define clear lines of authority for each program and with other departments Create and implement criteria for quality Introduce incentive funding if possible Improve faculty reward systems to reflect value
Dr. Sheri Dressler, NSEE, 2008
Best Practices Collaborate with academic deans and faculty to garner support and measure learning outcomes Report learning outcomes everywhere appropriate with the focus of feeding information back into curriculum and support the institutional mission for academic learning Obtain student comments on application of course content from reflection assignments and send them to appropriate faculty members