According to a liberal view of human rights, when human rights are violated the victim has a right to adequate compensation to remedy the violation. The right to compensation derives from the rights that were violated, as violating someone's right to their body without justification also gives them the right to compensation to recover mentally and physically. Under Article 32 of India's constitution, courts have established that the state is liable to pay compensation to victims when fundamental rights are breached, as compensation acknowledges the violated right and attempts to reimburse the damage caused.
According to a liberal view of human rights, when human rights are violated the victim has a right to adequate compensation to remedy the violation. The right to compensation derives from the rights that were violated, as violating someone's right to their body without justification also gives them the right to compensation to recover mentally and physically. Under Article 32 of India's constitution, courts have established that the state is liable to pay compensation to victims when fundamental rights are breached, as compensation acknowledges the violated right and attempts to reimburse the damage caused.
According to a liberal view of human rights, when human rights are violated the victim has a right to adequate compensation to remedy the violation. The right to compensation derives from the rights that were violated, as violating someone's right to their body without justification also gives them the right to compensation to recover mentally and physically. Under Article 32 of India's constitution, courts have established that the state is liable to pay compensation to victims when fundamental rights are breached, as compensation acknowledges the violated right and attempts to reimburse the damage caused.
According to a liberal view of human rights, when human rights are violated the victim has a right to adequate compensation to remedy the violation. The right to compensation derives from the rights that were violated, as violating someone's right to their body without justification also gives them the right to compensation to recover mentally and physically. Under Article 32 of India's constitution, courts have established that the state is liable to pay compensation to victims when fundamental rights are breached, as compensation acknowledges the violated right and attempts to reimburse the damage caused.
• According to the view of the liberal world, respect for
human rights also mean, providing adequate relief if those human rights are violated. • The right of compensation for the violation of fundamental rights is derived from the rights that were violated. • As a matter of fact, it is inherent in them, for example, a person’s right over his body, makes the other duty bound and forbids him to attack or injure without any justification. Moreover, this right over one’s body also gives him the right to compensation if he’s attacked unjustifiably, in order to help the him recover mentally and physically. Compensation is both acknowledgement of the violated right and an attempt to reimburse for the damage. Remedy of Compensation under Article 32 Compensation to victims is a perceived guideline of law being upheld through the conventional common courts.The seed of compensation for the breach of the rights implicit in Article 21 was first sowed in Khatri, Sant Bir and Veena Sethi, which sprouted with such a vigorous growth that it finally enabled the Court to hold that the State is liable to pay compensation.