Module 9 PPT - Workplace Privacy

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 45

EMPLOYEE’S RIGHT

TO PRIVACY!

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 1


The Balancing Act

When we start to look at an


employee’s right to privacy,
what is the other right that
we have to balance with it?

Employer’s right to info


about its employee!

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 2


Types of Info Employer Needs
What kinds of information does employer need
about an employee?

1. Contact information (home address,


telephone number, spouse’s work address
and number, medical doctor, etc.)

2. Health information (e.g., allergies,


medications, etc.)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 3


Types of Info Employer Needs (cont’d)

3. Hours worked (payroll, qualification for


benefits, job efficiency)

4. Banking information (depositing pay


and other sorts of payments)

5. Type of vehicle and plate number


(parking reasons)
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 4
Balancing Act Becoming More Difficult

Why is the balancing act


between an employee’s
right to privacy and an
employer’s right to info
about an employee
becoming more difficult?

Technology!
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 5
Balancing Act Becoming More Difficult
(cont’d)
U.S. Supreme Court Justice William
Douglas has said, “We are rapidly
entering the age of no privacy, where
everyone is open to surveillance at all
times.”

Source: http://www.langmichener.ca

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 6


Balancing Act Becoming More Difficult
(cont’d)

According to one survey, 92% of


companies monitor the use of e-mail, the
Internet, and other workplace technology
(Michael Hoffman et al., “You’ve Got Mail . . . And the Boss Knows:
A Survey by the Centre for Business Ethics of Companies’ Email
and Internet Monitoring, Business and Society Review, vol. 108, no.
3, p. 305)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 7


Balancing Act Becoming More Difficult
(cont’d)

TWO (2) GROUP PROBLEMS

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 8


The Legal Framework

1. If Employer is the Federal Gov’t or


Federal Crown Agency

Employee privacy rights are governed by


the Privacy Act, which was passed in
1982

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 9


The Legal Framework (cont’d)

2. If Employer is a Private Sector


Company Regulated by Federal Law

What are some examples of this kind of


employer?

Employee privacy rights regulated by


Personal Information Protection and Electronic
Documents Act (PIPEDA)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 10


The Legal Framework (cont’d)

3. Provincial Public Sector in Ontario

Employee privacy rights governed by the


Ontario Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act, which was
passed in 1990 (covers universities,
colleges, hospitals, Ontario government)
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 11
The Legal Framework (cont’d)

4. Provincial Private Sector in Ontario

Not entirely clear but most act as if


PIPEDA does apply to employee
privacy, not just customer privacy

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 12


The Legal Framework (cont’d)

4. Provincial Private Sector in Ontario

Going to look at PIPEDA because


Ontario will likely pass privacy legislation
that is very similar to PIPEDA in the next
few years

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 13


PIPEDA
What is “personal information”?

(1) Any information that (2) identifies something


(3) about a person in their personal, and (4)
individual capacity (e.g., home
address, home telephone number or e-
mail address, date of birth, age, gender, marital
status, race, ethnic origin, religion, credit
information) (section 1 of PIPEDA)
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 14
PIPEDA (cont’d)

Your name and any information about you


associated with your employment by a
business is not personal information (e.g.,
your business title, e-mail address at work,
business telephone number) (s. 1 of
PIPEDA)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 15


PIPEDA (cont’d)

PIPEDA Only Applies in Private Sector:

The rules in PIPEDA around the collection,


use, and disclosure of personal information
only apply to the private business sector

Thus, PIPEDA does not apply to universities,


colleges, hospitals, municipalities, and other
government agencies

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 16


PIPEDA (cont’d)

Not in B.C., Alberta & Quebec:

Although PIPEDA is a federal statute, the


provincial governments of B.C., Alberta, and
Quebec have an agreement with the feds
that the statute doesn’t apply in those
provinces
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 17
PIPEDA (cont’d)
In B.C., Alberta & Quebec:

In those three provinces, the provincial


governments have passed statutes of their own
regulating how private businesses use personal
information. These statutes are similar to, but not
identical to PIPEDA, so do your homework before
opening a business there

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 18


PIPEDA (cont’d)

Statute is Retroactive:

Although PIPEDA came


into law in 2004, it
nevertheless applies to
personal info collected by
a business before 2004

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 19


Requirements of PIPEDA

What does a business and its employees


have to do to comply with PIPEDA?

Basically, there are seven (7) different


requirements

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 20


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

1. Don’t Be Greedy!

Collect only the personal information


required for a specific purpose, no more
(e.g., for payroll purposes)

So, ask yourself, do I really need the person’s


social insurance number for payroll purposes?

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 21


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

2. Give a Full Explanation:

Explain clearly to the employee exactly


why you need the information that you are
collecting from them (e.g., we require it for
the pay equity plan)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 22


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

3. No Monkey Business:

You can only use the information


collected for the exact purpose you told
the employee. You cannot use it for a
purpose not disclosed to the employee.

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 23


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

3. No Monkey Business (cont’d)

For example, you cannot collect


information about dependants for life
insurance purposes and then give that
information to a disability insurer for a
different kind of insurance coverage
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 24
Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

4. Storage of Personal Data:

The employer must take all


reasonable steps to safeguard
personal info from theft,
unauthorized access, copying,
use or modification
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 25
Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

4. Storage of Personal Data:

Safeguarding includes taking (1)


physical measures (locked building,
rooms, file cabinets, restricted access)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 26


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

4. Storage of Personal Data (cont’d)

(2) Organizational safeguards such as


employee background checks, limited
access, etc.

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 27


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

4. Storage of Personal Data (cont’d)

(3) Technological measures such as


storage off the internet, use of
passwords, encryption, intrusion
detectors

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 28


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)
5. Keep It To Yourself

No disclosure of personal info by a business to a


3rd party unless:

1. The employee has expressly consented to


that particular disclosure, or

2. The disclosure is pursuant to a court order


requiring it

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 29


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)
5. Keep It To Yourself (cont’d)

Cannot outsource pension benefit


calculations using employee information
unless get express new consent from
employees

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 30


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)
6. Destruction Process

The business must have a


process set up to properly
destroy personal information
that is no longer required for
the business’s disclosed
purposes (e.g., physical
destruction of hard drives)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 31


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)
7. Organizational Requirements:

a. Create written procedures for


collection, use, and disclosure of
personal info

b. Assign specific employee(s) in writing the


task of ensuring that the written
procedures are followed by all employees

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 32


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

7. Organizational Requirements (cont’d)

c. Program in place to educate & train


employees about the business’s written
procedures for collecting and using
personal info

d. Written statements that explain to


employees the business’s procedures
on personal info collection and use

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 33


Requirements of PIPEDA (cont’d)

7. Organizational Requirements
(cont’d)

e. Establish a formal complaints


procedure for handling employee
complaints about how the business
has handled personal info

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 34


Surveillance of an Employee
A. On Duty Surveillance

Onus is on the employer to establish:

1. The measure is demonstrably necessary to meet a


specific employer need (e.g., protect property from theft); and,
2. The measure is likely to be effective in meeting that need; and,
3. The loss of privacy by the worker is proportionate to the benefit
gained by the employer; and,
4. There is no less privacy-invasive way to achieve the same end
as the video surveillance (Hunt, C. & Bell, C. (2014-15).
Employer Monitoring of Employee Online Activities outside
the Workplace: Not Taking Privacy Seriously? Canadian Lab. &
Emp. L.J. 18:411 at 431)
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 35
Surveillance of an Employee (cont’d)

B. Off Duty Surveillance

Need some clear justification for starting the


surveillance, such as reasonable grounds
(not a hunch) to believe an employee is lying
or stealing or doing something else directly
relevant to work and surveillance cannot be
too intrusive
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 36
Monitoring Work Computer Usage

This area is in a state of flux due in part to


the recent decision of the Supreme Court of
Canada in R. v. Cole, 2012 SCC 33 (see
textbook at p. 329)

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 37


Monitoring Work Computer Usage
(cont’d)

Distribute and discuss summary of the case

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 38


Monitoring Work Computer Usage
(cont’d)

It seems that in certain situations, an


employee has an expectation of privacy
from his employer for personal data the
employee stores on a computer owned by
the employer

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 39


Monitoring Work Computer Usage
(cont’d)

Where the employer, in accessing such


data, violates the employee’s expectation of
privacy, then the employer cannot make any
use of whatever information is so collected
despite the fact the employer owns the
equipment

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 40


Mandatory and Random Drug and
Alcohol Testing

How could making an employee take a drug


or alcohol test be considered a violation of
right to privacy?

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 41


Mandatory and Random Drug and
Alcohol Testing (cont’d)
The law seems to be that if the job is not a safety sensitive
one (i.e., one that is inherently dangerous), then:

1. Prior to an incident or accident need a reasonable


cause for testing an employee (e.g., evidence of
impairment, just returned from rehabilitation)

2. Can test after an incident or accident where


drugs or alcohol may have been a factor

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 42


Mandatory and Random Drug and
Alcohol Testing (cont’d)
In a job that is safety-sensitive (i.e., inherently
dangerous), the SCC has said that the employer
must demonstrate a problem with substance
abuse AND that random drug or alcohol testing is
a proportionate response to that problem (see
Textbook at p. 148)

See for example drunk Sunwing pilot case at


http://globalnews.ca/video/3161165/federal-transport-minister-
responds-to-drunk-sunwing-pilots-arrest (Federal transport minister
responds to Drunk Sunwing pilots arrest)
2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 43
Conclusion of Privacy Law

Questions?

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 44


The end!

… for now 

2019-11-25 Employment Law & Diversity Mgmt 45

You might also like