Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
1806-1873
Utilitarianism:
The moral philosophy that actions
derive their moral quality from their
usefulness as means to some end,
especially as means productive of
happiness or unhappiness.
Applied to civics and politics, the
greatest happiness of the greatest
number should be the sole end and
criterion of all public action.
Ethical situations generally
involve (1) a moral agent, (2) an
action or series of actions, (3)
consequences, and (4) a
recipient of the consequences.
Ethical situations generally
involve (1) a moral agent, (2) an
action or series of actions, (3)
consequences, and (4) a
recipient of the consequences.
1. Moral Agent: Responsible for action
(the doer, or the actor, to which praise
or blame is typically assigned)
2. Action: Something that occurs as a
results of the moral agent’s
decisionmaking process
3. Consequences: Result from action
4. Recipient: Receives the
consequences of the moral agent’s
action(s)
Utilitarian ethics are consequentialist (consequence
based).
When considering utilitarian
ethics, remember that:
1. They cause
2. The maximum
3. Total (aggregate)
4. Utility for the considered
recipients of action.
Note that utilitarian ethics
do not consider best
possible outcomes for all
recipients, but instead a
computation of total utility.
Utility is abstract. Under
utilitarian ethics, we want to
maximize total utility, but
we must first define utility.
John Stuart Mill’s
Utilitarianism
A more sophisticated form of
Utilitarianism.
Concerned with quality of
pleasure and quantity of
people who enjoy it.
Recognized higher and lower
types of human pleasure
John Stuart Mill’s
Utilitarianism
Lower pleasures: eating, drinking,
sexuality, etc.
Higher pleasures: intellectuality,
creativity and spirituality.
‘Better to be Socrates dissatisfied
than a fool satisfied’
‘Rule’ Utilitarian?
John Stuart Mill’s Adjustments to Utilitarianism