Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. John Cotter Centre For Financial Markets (CFM) University College Dublin
Prof. John Cotter Centre For Financial Markets (CFM) University College Dublin
$100
$80
$60 ABC
$40
$20 D
$0
10 20 30 40
$100
$80
$60 ABC
$40
$20
$0
10 20 30 40
100
80
buyers
60
sellers
40
20
0
10 20 30 40
P 0
rp = W1r1 + W2r2
W1 = Proportion of funds in Security 1
W2 = Proportion of funds in Security 2
r1 = Expected return on Security 1
r2 = Expected return on Security 2
rP = w1 - w0/ w0
ij ij i j
ij ij / i
where
j
2p = W12 1+
2
W22 22 + W32 32
+ 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2)
+ 2W1W3 Cov(r1r3)
+ 2W2W3 Cov(r2r3)
John Cotter UCD 2010 49
OUTCOMES OF MARKET
• Expected Risk and Return variables can
also be measured using subjective
probabilities
• All outcomes are determined according to
likelyhood (probability) of occurrence
public information
all
insider information
information
Time
John Cotter UCD 2010 67
Random Price Changes
Why are price changes random?
• Prices react to information
• Flow of information is random
• Therefore, price changes are random
-t 0 +t
Announcement Date
John Cotter UCD 2010 72
How Tests Are Structured
(cont’d)
2. Returns are adjusted to determine if they are
abnormal
Market Model approach
a. Rt = at + btRmt + et
(Expected Return)
b. Excess (ABNORMAL) Return =
(Actual - Expected)
et = Actual - (at + btRmt)
-t 0
John Cotter UCD 2010
+t
74
Portfolio Analysis
• Markowitz - investor want to max utility
• Analysis wants to choose assets from
infinite portfolio
• Feasible set - all portfolios
• choose efficient set - max return for given
risk and/or min risk for given return
y = % in p (1-y) = % in rf
E(rp) = 15%
P
E(rc) = 13%
C
rf = 7%
F
0 c
John Cotter UCD 2010
22% 82
Variance on
the Possible Combined Portfolios
Since r = 0, then
f
c = y* p
P
E(rp) = 15%
E(rp) - rf = 8%
) S = 8/22
rf = 7%
F
0 p = 22%
John Cotter UCD 2010 86
Risk Aversion and Allocation
• Greater levels of risk aversion lead to larger
proportions of the risk free rate
• Lower levels of risk aversion lead to larger
proportions of the portfolio of risky assets
• Willingness to accept high levels of risk for high
levels of returns would result in leveraged
combinations
Borrower
7%
Lender
p UCD
John Cotter = 22%
2010 88
ASSET PRICING MODELS
• Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• Factor Models
• Arbitrage Pricing Theory
CML
M
E(rM)
rf
p
m
John Cotter UCD 2010 97
Slope and Market Risk Premium
M = Market portfolio
rf = Risk free rate
E(rM) - rf = Market risk premium
r r [ E( r ) r ]
i f i M f
John Cotter UCD 2010 100
Security Market Line
E(r)
SML
E(rM)
rf
ß
ß = 1.0
John Cotter UCD 2010 101
Sample Calculations for SML
E(rm) - rf = .08 rf = .03
x = 1.25
E(rx) = .03 + 1.25(.08) = .13 or 13%
y = .6
e(ry) = .03 + .6(.08) = .078 or 7.8%
John Cotter UCD 2010 102
Graph of Sample Calculations
E(r)
SML
Rx=13% .08
Rm=11%
Ry=7.8%
3%
ß
.6 1.0 1.25
ß ß ß
yJohn Cotterm
UCD 2010 x 103
Disequilibrium Example
E(r)
SML
15%
Rm=11%
rf=3%
ß
1.0 1.25
John Cotter UCD 2010 104
Disequilibrium Example
• Suppose a security with a of 1.25 is
offering expected return of 15%
• According to SML, it should be 13%
• Underpriced: offering too high of a rate of
return for its level of risk
ri iI i1rI iI
r i = ai, I + bi, rI + e i, I
where the factor is the market index (I)
• no factor sensitivity:
b1X1 + b2X2 +b3X3 = 0
ri = ai + bi1 F1 + bi2 F2 +. . .
+ biKF K
where r is the return on security i
b is the coefficient of the factor
F is the factor
10
D A
7
6
C
Risk Free 4
.5 1.0 Beta
Pf = Ps
where Pf is the current purchase price of the futures
Ps is the expected future spot price at delivery
Pf > Ps
– this implies that Pf can be expected to fall during its contract life
PS
0 200
100
stock price
John Cotter UCD 2010 146
THE VALUATION OF OPTIONS
• CALL VALUATION AT EXPIRATION
– ASSUME: the strike price = $100
– For a call if the stock price is less than $100,
the option is worthless at expiration
– The upward sloping line represents the intrinsic
value (IV) of the option
value 100
of
the
option
E=100
0 stock price
CALLS
100 p
0
LOSSES
John Cotter UCD 2010 149
THE BINOMIAL OPTION
PRICING MODEL (BOPM)
• WHAT DOES BOPM DO?
– it estimates the fair value of a call or a put option
• ASSUME THAT OPTION IS EUROPEAN
(RELAX LATER FOR AMERICAN)
– EUROPEAN is an option that can be exercised only on
its expiration date
– AMERICAN is an option that can be exercised any
time up until and including its expiration date
$100
$80 P0=$0
Semiannual Analysis: $125 P0=25
$111.80
t=0 t=.5T
John Cotter UCD 2010
t=T 153
THE BLACK-SCHOLES
MODEL
• Estimating fair value of European call/put
for continuous time?
• How is the BOPM model affected if the
number of periods before expiration were
allowed to increase infinitely?
PB C t
ParValue T
(1 r )
T
t 1 (1 r )
t
Yield
John Cotter UCD 2010 172
Yield to Maturity
• Interest rate that makes the present value of
the bond’s payments equal to its price
Solve the bond formula for r
T
PB C t
ParValue T
(1 r )
T
t 1 (1 r )
t
Upward
Sloping
Flat
Downward
Sloping
Maturity
John Cotter UCD 2010 180
Theories of Term Structure
• Expectations
• Liquidity Preference
– Upward bias over expectations
• Market Segmentation
– Preferred Habitat
Forward Rates
Liquidity
Premium
Maturity
John Cotter UCD 2010 184
Market Segmentation
and Preferred Habitat
• Short- and long-term bonds are traded in distinct markets
• Trading in the distinct segments determines the various
rates
• Observed rates are not directly influenced by
expectations
• Preferred Habitat
– Modification of market segmentation
– Investors will switch out of preferred maturity
segments if premiums are adequate
YTM
John Cotter UCD 2010 198
Duration
• A measure of the effective maturity of a bond
• The weighted average of the times until each payment
is received, with the weights proportional to the
present value of the payment
• Duration is shorter than maturity for all bonds except
zero coupon bonds
• Duration is equal to maturity for zero coupon bonds