Rick's English Hut is facing sustainability issues with its current operations and regulations requiring at least 50% of sales from food. The document evaluates three options: 1) Buying a liquor license, which merely adds to fixed costs without increasing sales. 2) Closing early and losing profitable liquor sales, reducing overall revenue. 3) Selling brunch at a loss, which paradoxically provides the best financial outcomes despite an initial loss. The takeaways are on the importance of analyzing at the firm level when fixed costs are joint and on ensuring the underlying problem is correctly identified.
Rick's English Hut is facing sustainability issues with its current operations and regulations requiring at least 50% of sales from food. The document evaluates three options: 1) Buying a liquor license, which merely adds to fixed costs without increasing sales. 2) Closing early and losing profitable liquor sales, reducing overall revenue. 3) Selling brunch at a loss, which paradoxically provides the best financial outcomes despite an initial loss. The takeaways are on the importance of analyzing at the firm level when fixed costs are joint and on ensuring the underlying problem is correctly identified.
Rick's English Hut is facing sustainability issues with its current operations and regulations requiring at least 50% of sales from food. The document evaluates three options: 1) Buying a liquor license, which merely adds to fixed costs without increasing sales. 2) Closing early and losing profitable liquor sales, reducing overall revenue. 3) Selling brunch at a loss, which paradoxically provides the best financial outcomes despite an initial loss. The takeaways are on the importance of analyzing at the firm level when fixed costs are joint and on ensuring the underlying problem is correctly identified.
Sales (Food) in $ $ 27,000 sustainable Sales (liquor) in $ 33,000 Total sales $ 60,000 • Regulation that food sales be at least 50% CMR (Food) in % 20% CMR (liquor) in % 50%
Current fixed cost ($) $ 10,950 • Which of the three options
considered is the best? Evaluation: Current state CMR (food = 45%) 20% • Liquor has much higher CMR (liquor = 55%) 50% CMR than food
Weighted CMR 36.5% • Fixed costs are joint
• No sense in allocating to Breakeven revenue $30,000 individual products Current profit $10,950 Operating Leverage 200.0% • The firm is doing well Margin of safety 50.0% Evaluation: Buy license for $1,168 CMR (food) 20% • Option merely adds to fixed CMR (liquor) 50% costs. Sales still at 33K for liquor and 27K for food. Weighted CMR 36.5% • Bad outcomes • Increases break even volume • Decreases margin of safety Old Fixed cost $10,950 • Increase operating leverage Additional fixed cost 1,168 Total fixed cost $12,118 • In general, adding fixed Breakeven revenue $33,200 costs is not profit maximizing Profit 9,782 • Need to have off-setting Operating Leverage 223.9% incremental revenue Margin of safety 44.7% Evaluation: Close early & lose liquor sales CMR (food; 50% share) 20% • Option reduces revenue of more profitable product! Sales CMR (liquor; 50% share) 50% of $27K each for liquor and for food Weighted CMR 35.0% • Bad outcomes • No change in break even volume (FC and CMR offset) Old Fixed cost $10,950 • Decreases margin of safety • Increase operating leverage Additional fixed cost (450) Total fixed cost $10,500 • In general, getting rid of revenue is not good unless we can get rid of fixed costs as Breakeven revenue $30,000 well • Need to offset $3,000 (CM from Profit 8,400 lost sales of $6,000 in liquor) for Operating Leverage 225.0% same profit Margin of safety 44.4% Evaluation: Sell brunch for a loss CMR (food; 40.91% share) 20% • Option adds a “loss leader” CMR (liquor; 50% share) 50% • Brunch adds $6K to current sales CMR (brunch; 9.09% share) -2% • Selling for less than variable cost! Weighted CMR 33.0% • Best outcome Old Fixed cost $10,950 • Breakeven goes up a bit • OL is a bit higher Additional fixed cost 105 • MOS is a bit lower Total fixed cost $11,055 • How can this be? • Adding small fixed cost Breakeven revenue $33,500 • Loss per $ in brunch in small Profit 10,725 • Sales of brunch are also low Operating Leverage 201.9% Margin of safety 49.5% Take away points • Role for regulation
• Effect of loss leader
• It is not proper to analyze each product separately when the
fixed costs are joint • Generally, we even add “traceable” fixed costs to obtain one total fixed costs • Analysis is at the firm level
• Might be OK to do individual product level analysis IF
common fixed costs are “small” and the traceable fixed cost is “large” Larger issues • Is Rick solving the right problem?
• The choice is one of strategy – what business does Rick want
to run?
• If Bar – Get license & max out on liquor sales
• If Restaurant – we have to find ways to increase food sales
• Brunch may add a lot to the workload & impinge on life style issues • Is additional fixed cost only $105? What about OC of his time?
• Create new options: Increase liquor prices and lower food prices?