Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture Week 4
Lecture Week 4
Global Politics
Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/
Structural Realism
1
Core assumptions
Anarchy as the defining feature of the
international political system.
Structure of the system as a major
determinant of state behavior (hence
structural realism).
States as rational actors.
States as self-interest oriented actors.
National survival as the most critical
problem in the anarchic international
system.
2
Kenneth Waltz
A Theory of International Politics
(1979)
Identified problems in
classical realism.
Main problem = state-
centric.
Theory should tell us
about units (states) and
system as a whole.
3
International system
state-level explanations are
important but the impact of structure
should be examined
Structure defined by anarchy and the
distribution of capabilities across
states.
No differentiation of functions
between different states.
4
Distribution of capabilities
Power defined more broadly to go
beyond military power and ability to
use military power
Power defined as the combined
capabilities of states
States are functionally similar but
different in terms of their power
Power/capabilities as determinants of
state behaviour/foreign policy choice
5
The Balance of Power
The distribution of power at a
systemic level.
A mechanism to prevent the
dominance of any one state in the
international system.
Can be natural or strategy pursued
by states.
Does not preserve peace, but
preserves security of states.
6
Hegemony
One state is dominant in the
international system.
Two periods of hegemony: Pax-
Britannica and Pax-Americana.
When conditions of hegemony prevail
– much better chance institutions will
be created and/or function effectively
Why?
7
Hegemonic Stability Theory (HST)
Developed to explain the collapse of
economies and the onset of
depression in early 20th Century.
International system always tends
towards instability.
But this can be avoided if dominant
state assumes leadership
(hegemonic) role.
8
Example of HST in action
Bretton Woods system (GATT, World
Bank, IMF)
Provided system of economic rules,
values and norms based on US
domination of world system post
1945.
9
To conclude …
Neo-realists are more concerned
than classical realists with the
system in which states exist and
interact.
It is also more concerned with
conditions of international anarchy
Bridges realism with liberalism:
introduces idea of co-operation BUT
via hegemonic powers.
10