Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Report With Voice
Final Report With Voice
Santosh Budhathoki
11587608
OBJECTIVE OF THE WORK
Objectives
Comparison analysis for the current SOSE methods used in Industry and
Academia
Evaluation of two methods used in Industry and Academia
Propose an universal solution
Questions
Impact factors for SOSE methods
Limitations in current solution for Industry and Academia
Ways to mitigate these limitations
BACKGROUND
Current SOSE methodologies and their objectives
Best chosen Method used in Industry and Academia
Issues with the Best chosen Method used in Industry and Academia
Possible solutions to overcome the issues.
CURRENT BEST SOLUTION FOR INDUSTRY
Component Based Development and Integration-Service Architecture and Engineering (CBDI-SAE) Meta Model
for SOA 2.0
Service Version
Identify Service Process
Business Process
Virtual Labs
User Registration Service User Registration Service
SOAP SOAP Virtual Classrooms
User Profile Updating Services User Profile Updating Service
Digital Library
Content Discovery Service
Content Discovery Service
Database
Strength
Cost efficient. Limitation
Dependable Learning Services. Learning course are not included.
Cross platform communication. Learning object are missing.
Provides service infrastructure like Focuses only on internal network and private
virtual labs, classroom etc. UDDI.
Helps update user profile regularly.
LIMITATIONS
• Services like Learning Course, Learning Objects are not included.
• Current Framework only focuses in internal network system.
• Only private Universal Discovery Description Integration (UDDI)
service are included in the registry.
EVALUATION TECHNIQUES FOR ACADEMIA
Universal Framework for Academia
Comparison Table
Evaluation Table
Justification Table
PROPOSED WORK FOR ACADEMIA
Q & A ???