Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT (BM Purwanto)
CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT (BM Purwanto)
BM. PURWANTO
DISTINCTIVENESS OF THE SCHOOL
• MISSION, VISION, VALUES,
• GRADUATE PROFILES,
• LEARNING OUTCOMES,
• PEDAGIGICAL APPROACH
• PEER SCHOOLS VS. ASPIRANT SCHOOLS
• POINT OF PARITY VS. POINT OF DIFFERENCE
• SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT VS. BUSINESS
SCHOOL
• INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT OUTCOME
IMPACT
STRUCTURE OF DISCUSSION
2. OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION
5. CURRICULUM MAP
• MISSION
– Enriched by our vibrant international network but
rooted in local wisdom, we develop leaders with the
integrity and knowledge needed to serve society. Our
contribution to the advancement of knowledge is
through quality research and teaching.
• VISION
– To be the leading faculty of economics and business in
Indonesia by rising to international challenges.
VALUES
• INTEGRITY
– Upholding the principles of honesty, consistency of words
and deeds, commitment to promises, moral courage in
defending truth, the interests of the organization over the
interests of groups and individuals, and being trustworthy
and responsible.
• PROFESSIONALISM
– Playing its role by referring to the quality and performance
standards, conformity with the expertise, expertise and
competence, the spirit of self-development in a
sustainable, client-oriented and accountable manner.
VALUES
• ACADEMIC FREEDOM
– Recognizing the concept and practice of academic
freedom as a central behavior that is to be upheld in
learning, teaching, research, and scholarship.
VALUES
• SOCIAL CONCERN
– Have a commitment and seriousness to
participate and actively involved in handling and
solving various economic, business and social
problems faced by the community.
THE ROLE OF MISSION IN CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING
PROCESS
MISSION
VISION
VALUES
GRADUATE
PROFILE
LEARNING
OUTCOMES
IMPACT
Outcomes Based Education
stages in the backward design process
1
LEARNING
OUTCOMES -
DESIRED RESULTS
2
ASSESSMENT –
ACCEPTABLE
EVIDENCE
3
LEARNING
EXPERIENCES
AND
INSTRUCTION
MISI EVALUASI
12
KESELARASAN MISI
MISI SEBAGAI LANDASAN
13
ASSURANCE OF LEARNING
MISSION LEARNING OUTCOMES
• It requires that the students demonstrate that they have learnt the
required skills and content.
DEFICIENCIES OF TRADITIONAL EDUCATION
Provides students with a learning environment with little
attention to whether or not students ever learn the material.
Innovate
Engage
Deliver Impact
• The curriculum
– has clearly formulated learning outcomes,
– Is reflecting the relevant demands and needs of all
stakeholders.
DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS TO LEARNING OUTCOMES
• KNOW • UNDERSTAND
– SUMMARIZE – APPLY
• REFLECT • APPRECIATE
– SHARE REFLECTIONS – DISCUSS
• THINK CRITICALLY
– INTERPRET
– ANALYZE
– EVALUATE
– CONSTRUCT ARGUMENTS
CATEGORY OF OUTCOMES
• Generic/transferable skills/competencies –
relate to any/all disciplines
– teamwork
– problem-solving
– communication skills
– ethical reasoning
LEVELS OF LEARNING: REVISED
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY –
ACTIONS AND VERBS CREATING Build, change,
create, adapt,
improve, modify
• Examples:
– Strategic Plan. Give students the knowledge and skills that
are increasingly important in today’s interconnected world,
including interpersonal, professional, and visual
communications skills; collaboration and teamwork,
especially with diverse others; empathy and concern for
the welfare of others; and organizational and leadership
skills.
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Program outcomes are statements of what
faculty expect graduates should be able to do
after completing their programs of study.
These statements should be written in
specific, demonstrable (measurable), and
student-centered terms.
EXAMPLES OF PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Graduates of the program should be able to:
– Identify, explain, and use economic concepts, theories,
models, and data-analytic techniques.
– Use knowledge and skills of economics, mathematics,
statistics, and computing flexibly in a variety of contexts.
– Apply economic tools to formulate positions on a wide
range of social and economic problems and engage
effectively in policy debates.
– Use investigate skills necessary for conducting original
economic research and participating effectively in project
team.
– Deliver effective presentations in which they combine
visual communication design with oral arguments and/or
written word.
LEARNING OUTCOMES LEARNING GOALS
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
BROAD LEARNING
GOAL: LEADERSHIP
LEARNING GOAL:
LEARNING GOAL: LEARNING GOAL:
UNDERSTANDING THE
PROBLEM SOLVING EFFECTIVE
IMPORTANCE OF
SKILLS COMMUNICATOR
ETHICAL BEHAVIOR
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
LEARNING GOALS LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LEARNING GOAL:
OUR GRADUATES WILL UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF BEHAVING
ETHICALLY IN THEIR PROFESSIONAL LIVES (I.E., HAVE AN ETHICAL
PERSPECTIVE).
CORRESPONDING OBJECTIVES:
OUR STUDENTS WILL KNOW THE PROFESSIONAL CODE OF CONDUCT WITHIN
THEIR DISCIPLINE.
OUR STUDENTS WILL IDENTIFY THE ACTIVITIES/ISSUES IN THEIR CHOSEN
PROFESSION THAT MAY PRESENT ETHICAL CHALLENGES, AND WILL
ARTICULATE THE CONSEQUENCES ASSOCIATED WITH UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR.
OUR STUDENTS WILL IDENTIFY AN ETHICAL DILEMMA IN A SCENARIO CASE
AND APPLY AN ETHICS MODEL OR FRAMEWORK TO PROPOSE AND DEFEND A
RESOLUTION.
LEARNING GOALS LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LEARNING GOAL:
OUR GRADUATES WILL DEMONSTRATE PROBLEM SOLVING
SKILLS, SUPPORTED BY APPROPRIATE ANALYTICAL AND
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES.
CORRESPONDING OBJECTIVE:
IN A CASE SETTING, STUDENTS WILL USE APPROPRIATE
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES TO IDENTIFY A BUSINESS PROBLEM,
GENERATE AND COMPARE ALTERNATIVES, AND DEVELOP A
SOLUTION.
IN A CASE SETTING, STUDENTS WILL RECOGNIZE AND ANALYZE
ETHICAL PROBLEMS, CHOOSE, AND DEFEND A SOLUTION.
LEARNING GOALS LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LEARNING GOAL:
OUR GRADUATES WILL BE EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATORS.
CORRESPONDING OBJECTIVES:
OUR STUDENTS WILL PRODUCE PROFESSIONAL QUALITY
BUSINESS DOCUMENTS.
OUR STUDENTS WILL DELIVER A PROFESSIONAL QUALITY
PRESENTATION ACCOMPANIED BY APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY.
OUR STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE EFFECTIVE
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN A TEAM SETTING.
LEARNING OUTCOME STATEMENTS
• Learning outcomes statements are typically
characterised by the use of active verbs expressing
knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis,
synthesis, evaluation, creation etc.
MK2 VV V
MK3 VVV V V
MK4 V VV VV V V
MK5
MK6
MK7
MK8
MK9
PETA KURIKULUM:
MATA KULIAH/KEGIATAN PEMBELAJARAN DAN
LEVEL PEMBELAJARAN
MK1
MK2
MK3
MK4
MK5
MK6
MK7
MK8
MK9
STUDY PROGRAM LEVELS
Tujuan Umum dan Esensi Pendidikan
S1 MM MSi S3
Broad education Problem solvers Teaching and Knowledge
research development
Operational problems
Problem oriented Knowledge developers
S1 MM Msi S3
Foundation subjects Understanding and Mastering Customized
applying knowledge knowledge
Basic (management) Flexible
knowledge Developing managerial Testing
wisdom knowledge Originality
Interpersonal skills
More specialized Teaching Finding new
Basic abilities capabilities principles
Decision making and
Techniques of doing problem solving Research Research methods in
methods detail on different
Generalis dg Techniques of doing issues and conditions
spesialisasi terbatas Generalis dg
Generalis dg spesialisasi spesialisasi Spesialisasi
terbatas, generalis terbatas
Tujuan Umum dan Esensi Pendidikan
S1 MM MSi S3
Acquiring basic Understanding and Mastering knowledge Developing knowledge
knowledge and applying knowledge
managerial skills Developing research Enhancing research
Developing skills and teaching competencies
Developing managerial wisdom capabilities
interpersonal skills (judgments) and
and basic abilities skills Problem solvers utk
masalah yang tidak
Developing attitude Acquiring more biasa ditemukan
specialized skills
Developing decision
making and problem
solving skills
Metode Pembelajaran
Dimensi S1 MM MSi S3
Riset – Praktik Sedikit riset Praktik Riset Riset
Sedikit Sedikit riset
praktik
Konsep
dasar
Art – Science Art: 30% Art: 40% Art: 5% Art: 5%
Science: Science: 60% Science: 95% Science: 95%
70%
Publikasi di jurnal
profesional
ASSURANCE OF LEARNING SYSTEM
Learning Goal 7: Interpersonal Behaviour and Team Building
This LG is measured through end term assessment in Organizational Behaviour & ITOD
Objectives Excellent Good Fair Unsatisfactory
Able to demonstrate their Demonstrates excellent understanding of Partially demonstrates an Has limited understanding of Lacks clarity of the team goals
ability to work collaboratively team goals, smoothly interfaces with the understanding of the team goals , the team goals, interfaces with ,does not provide support in the
as a team to accomplish team creating synergy , and proactively interfaces with the team creating the team but provides limited achievement of team goals, and
desired goals enables achievement of team goals synergy , and provides support in support to the team in works as a passive member
achievement of team goals achievement of team goals
Able to manage conflict and Demonstrates ability to fully identify and Demonstrates ability to identify and Demonstrates limited ability to Demonstrates limited ability to
differences in the team to address conflict and team differences, and partially address conflict and team identify and address conflict identify conflict and team
complete task within desired constructively engages to resolve these, re- differences, and engages to resolve and team differences, and differences but does not engage
timelines directing focus towards achieving the task these, re-directing focus towards engages in a limited manner to to address these
within desired timelines. achieving the task within desired resolve these
timelines
LG 7 Interpersonal Behaviour and Team Learning Object Levels Process Methods of Data5 Course E G F U
Goal ives collecting 2016-17
Building, evidence
ITOD LG 7 LG 7.1 Excellent Each Student 4 level Term-II Organizatio 1% 58% 40% 1%
, Good, evaluated rubrics (N=169) nal
Fair, through Behaviour
Unsatisfa
LG 7.2 compulsory Term-II 1% 58% 40% 1%
ctory
60 question in (N=169)
50 end term
exam of OB
40 LG 7 LG 7.1 Excellent Each Student 4 level Term III Internationa 23% 50% 16% 11%
30 , Good, evaluated rubrics (N=115) l Trade
Fair, through Operations
20 Unsatisfa &
individual
ctory Documenta
10 Project in tion
0 LG 7.2 Excellent ITOD 4 level Term III 23% 50% 16% 11%
E G F U , Good, rubrics (N=115)
Fair,
Unsatisfa
LG 7.1 LG 7.2
ctory
5 Variation in number of students evaluated as AOL evaluation in OB is completed only in Delhi campus, whereas AOL evaluation in ITOD is completed only in Kolkata campus
Step 8:
Revise the Assessment Plan
and Continue the Loop
Step 7: Step 1:
Close the Loop Identify Program
(Use the Results) Goals
Cycle Step 2:
Step 6: of Assessment Specify Intended
Report Findings Learning Outcomes
And Conclusions (Objectives)
Step 3:
Step 5:
Select Assessment
Analyze and Interpret
Methods
the Data:
(Make Sense of It All)
Step 4:
Implement:
Data Collection
Masukan
AoL dari AoL dan
Data
UJM
UJM
Prodi Tim
AACSB Analisis hasil
Penugasan Pengukuran
Fakultas Siklus
Asesmen KK Review dan
Pertimbangan dan
rekomendasi
Pengesahan
Senat Prodi
Laporan
Usulan
perubahan
Fakultas
Persetujuan PROSES DIKOORDINASI OLEH FAKULTAS
DAN DEPARTEMEN
TERIMA KASIH
THANK YOU