Control of Hazardous Energy

CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY
Snamprogetti SAFETY TRAINING
LOCKOUT/TAGOUT- SLIDE 1 OF 67
COURSE ATTENDEES
 Facility Engineers
 Process Engineers
 Safety Committees
 Machine Operators
 Corporate Managers
 Equipment Operators
 Department Managers
 First Line Supervisors
 Maintenance Departments
 Accident Investigation Team Members
COURSE OBJECTIVES
 Teach The Student to Recognize Where
Lockout/Tag-out Is Needed.
 Allow the Student to Develop an Understanding of
the the Local Lockout/Tag-out Policy.
 Introduce Techniques Needed to Select the
Appropriate Lockout/Tag-out Devices.
 Teach the Student to Successfully Conduct
Lockout/Tag-out Operations.
 Introduce the Rules for Safe Lockout/Tag-out.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
 Recognize Where Lockout/Tag-out Is Needed.

 Understand the Local Lockout/Tag-out Policy.
 Select the Appropriate Lockout/Tag-out Devices.
 Successfully Conduct Lockout/Tag-out Operations.
 Introduce the Rules for Safe Lockout/Tag-out.
REGULATORY STANDARD
THE GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE
EMPLOYERS MUST: Furnish a place of employment

free of recognized hazards that are causing or are likely
to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.
REGULATORY STANDARD
CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY
- Safety and Health Standards
- General Industry
- Lockout Tag-out Standard
CIRCUMSTANCES OF INJURY
HOW MOST INJURIES OCCUR

IN ORDER OF OCCURRENCE
 Injured by Moving Machinery Part.
 Made Contact With Energized Part.
 Injured by Physical Hazard (Heat, Chemicals).
 Injured by Falling Machine Part.



ACTIVITY AT TIME OF ACCIDENT

FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
1. Un-jamming Object(S) From Equipment
2. Cleaning Equipment
3. Repairing Equipment
4. Performing Routine Maintenance
5. Installing Equipment
ACTIVITY AT TIME OF ACCIDENT
FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
6. Adjusting Equipment
7. Doing Set-up Work
8. Performing Electrical Work
9. Inspecting Equipment
10. Testing Materials
REASONS FOR EQUIPMENT NOT BEING TURNED OFF
 Afraid of Slow Down in Production.
ON OFF
 Afraid It Would Take Too Long.
 Not Required by Company Procedure.
 Worker Didn't Know Power Was on.
SYSTEM
 Worker Didn't Know How to Turn Off. CONTROL
 Did Not Think It Was Necessary. SWITCH
 Task Could Not Be Done With Power Off.
REASONS FOR EQUIPMENT BEING TURNED ON
 Accidentally Turned on by Injured Employee

 Co-Worker Accidentally Turned Equipment On
 Equipment Moved When Jam-up Cleared
ON OFF
 Equipment Unexpectedly "Cycled"
 Parts Still in Motion (Coasting)
SYSTEM
CONTROL
SWITCH
CASE STUDY #1
KILLED BY THE MOVING PARTS OF A SAW
Narrative: An Employee Was Cleaning the Unguarded Side of

an Operating Granite Saw. The Employee Was
Caught in the Moving Parts Of The Saw and
Pulled Into a Nip Point Between The Saw Blade
and the Idler Wheel, Resulting In Fatal Injuries.
Citation: Failure to Shutdown or Turn off Equipment To

Perform Maintenance.
CASE STUDY #2
DECAPITATED BY SHEARING MACHINE
Narrative: An Employee Was Removing Scrap From Beneath

a Large Shear When a Fellow Employee Hit the
Control Button Activating The Blade. The Blade
Cycled and Decapitated The Employee Cleaning
Scrap.
Citation: Failure to Shutdown or Turn off Equipment To

Perform Maintenance.
CASE STUDY #3
KILLED BY PNEUMATIC DOOR
Narrative: An Employee Was Partially Inside of an Asphalt

Mixing Machine Changing Its Paddles. Another
Employee, While Dusting in The Control Room,
Accidentally Hit a Toggle Switch Which Caused
the Door of the Mixer to Close, Striking the First
Employee on the Head and Killing Him.
Citation: Failure to Isolate Equipment From Energy Sources

Before Attempting Any Repair, Maintenance or
Servicing.
DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEES
 Authorized Employee
The Person Who Locks or Tags Out Machines To
Perform Servicing or Maintenance.
 Affected Employee
An Employee Whose Job Requires Him or Her To
Operate or Use a Machine or Piece of Equipment
On Which Servicing or Maintenance Is Being
Performed.
DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEES
 Designated Inspector
 Does Not Utilize the Specific Procedure.
 The Person Who Inspects the LO/TO Procedure.
 Is an Authorized Employee.
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
 Authorized Employee
 Recognition of Hazardous Energy Sources.
 Type and Magnitude Energy Sources.
 Energy Isolation and Control Methods.
 Affected Employee
 Purpose and Use of The Energy Control Program.
 All Other Employees

 Procedures and Prohibitions Relating To Attempts to
Restart or Reenergize Machines or Equipment Which Are
Locked Out or Tagged Out..
RETRAINING REQUIREMENTS
Authorized and Affected Employees

Retraining Provided When There Is a:
 Change in Job Assignment.
 Change in Machines, Equipment or Processes.
 Change in Energy Control Procedures.
 Close-Call Event.
 Failure in the Procedures.
 Reason to Doubt Employee Proficiency.
ENERGY CONTROL PROGRAM
 THREE ELEMENTS TO THE PROGRAM:
1. ENERGY CONTROL PROCEDURES
2. EMPLOYEE TRAINING
3. PERIODIC INSPECTIONS
DEFINITION OF LOCKOUT
Lockout Is Defined as:

The Placement of a Lockout Device on an Energy Isolating
Device, in Accordance With an Established Procedure,
Ensuring That the Energy Isolating Device and the Equipment
Being Controlled Cannot Be Operated Until the Lockout
Device Is Removed.
DEFINITION OF ENERGY ISOLATING DEVICE
 Block
 Line Valve
 Disconnecting Switch
 Manually Operated Switch
 Any Other Device That Isolates Energy
TYPES OF ENERGY SOURCES
 HYDRAULIC
 PNEUMATIC
 MECHANICAL
 RADIOACTIVE
 THERMAL DANGER
 ELECTRICAL HIGH
VOLTAGE
 CHEMICAL
TYPES OF ENERGY STATES
ACTIVE ENERGY STORED ENERGY
110 VOLTS AC HOT SURFACE
ACTIVE ENERGY
 VOLTAGES
 EXTERNAL PRESSURIZED LINE FEEDS
TO THE MACHINE
STORED ENERGY
 INTERNAL LINE PRESSURES
 CAPACITORS
 SURFACE TEMPERATURES
 MECHANICAL TENSION (SPRINGS, ETC.)
 COASTING OF PARTS
 CHEMICAL (OPPOSING pH)
 GRAVITY
THE SCOPE OF LOCKOUT/TAGOUT
AREAS
 SERVICING OF MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT
 MAINTENANCE OF MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT
AREAS NOT REGULATED:

 CONSTRUCTION, AGRICULTURE AND MARITIME
 WORK CONTROLLED BY ELECTRIC UTILITIES
 ELECTRIC UTILITY INSTALLATIONS
 OIL AND GAS WELL DRILLING AND SERVICING
ACTIVITIES COVERED
 NORMAL OPERATIONS:
1. Covered If an Employee Must Remove or Bypass Guards or
Devices
2. Covered Where Employees Are Required to Put A Body Part in

a Machine Process Area
3. Covered Where Employees Are Required to Put A Body Part in

a Machine Having a Danger Zone
TAGOUT REQUIREMENTS
DANGER
LOCKED
OUT
DO NOT OPERATE
This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by
NAME: _______________
DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION
DATE: ________________
TIME: _________________
REQUIREMENTS IF TAGOUT IS USED
 SOME KEY POINTS ABOUT TAGS:

DANGER
 Tags Are Only Warning Devices! LOCKED
 Tags Must Be Securely Attached! OUT
DO NOT OPERATE
 May Evoke False Sense of Security! This Lock/Tag may

only be removed by

NAME: _______________
Tags Do Not Provide Physical Restraint! DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION

DATE: ________________
Tags Must Never Be Defeated or Ignored! TIME: _________________
 Must Withstand Environmental Conditions!

 Tags Must Be Legible and Understandable!
 Tags Are Only Removed by the Responsible Person.
LOCK OUT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
1. Preparation for Shutdown
2. Shutdown
3. Machine or Equipment Isolation
DANGER
4. Application of Lockout/Tag-out Devices LOCKED
5. Testing of LO/TO OUT
DO NOT OPERATE
6. Servicing or Maintenance This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by
7. Removal of LO/TO Devices NAME: _______________
DEPT : _______________
8. Re-Energize EXPECTED COMPLETION
DATE: ________________
TIME: _________________
9. Equipment Reactivation
WRITTEN PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
ALL CONTRACTORS MUST: WRITTEN PROGRAM

---------- ----------
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
----------

----------
Maintain a Written Program. ----------
---------- ----------
----------
 Review the Program on an Annual Basis.

 Develop Detailed Energy Control Procedures.
 Review Individual LO/TO Procedures Annually.
 Make the Written Program Available to All Affected
Employees During Each Work Shift.
ENERGY CONTROL PROCEDURES
STANDARD REQUIRES THAT:

Procedures Be Developed, Documented and
Utilized for Control of Potentially Hazardous Energy
When Employees Are Engaged in the Activities
Covered by the Standard.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS
COMMONLY USED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS
 Decision Flow Chart.

 Lockout Tag-out Equipment Assessment.
 Equipment Procedural Review.
 Machine/Equipment Listing.
 Non-Routine Task - (Protective Measures)
COMMONLY USED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS:
 DECISION FLOW CHART:

Used to Provide a Standardized Decision Making Process for
Establishment and Maintenance of the Energy Control Program.
 LOCKOUT TAGOUT EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT FORM:

Used to Gather Information From Specific Equipment From the
Shop Floor. The Information Gathered Can Then Be Used to
Develop Specific Energy Control Procedures for Individual
Equipment.

 EQUIPMENT PROCEDURAL REVIEW FORM:
Equipment Having Energy Control Procedures Must Have the
Procedures Reviewed on an Annual Basis. The Procedural
Review Form Is Used to Track Annual Review Dates.
 MACHINE/EQUIPMENT LISTING FORM:

Used to Identify Specific Equipment and Machinery That Have
Been Assessed and Are Considered Part Of the Energy Control
Program.
 NON-ROUTINE TASK - (PROTECTIVE MEASURES) FORM:

Used by Supervisors to Assess Jobs That Are Not Performed on
a Routine Basis, but Where the Possibility of Injury to an
Employee Exists.
PROCEDURES MUST CONTAIN:
1. Statement of Intended Use.
2. Steps for Shut-Down and Energy Control.
3. Steps for LO/TO Device Placement, Transfer and Removal.
4. Determination of Responsibility.
5. Steps for Testing LO/TO.
LO/TO
CHECK
LIST
EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT
TO HAVE WRITTEN LOTO PROCEDURES
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING EIGHT CONDITIONS MUST EXIST:
1. No Potential for Residual, Stored or Re-accumulation of Energy.
2. Contains Only One Energy Source Which Is Readily Identified

and Isolated.
3. Isolating & Locking Out Results in Complete De-Energization.
4. The Machine or Equipment Is Isolated or Locked Out During

Maintenance.
5. One Lockout Device Will Achieve Complete Lockout.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT
TO HAVE WRITTEN LOTO PROCEDURES
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING EIGHT CONDITIONS MUST EXIST:
6. The Lockout Device Is Under Exclusive Control Of An

Authorized Employee
7. Servicing/Maintenance Does Not Produce Hazards For Other

Employees
8. No Previous Energy Control Accident History Exists for the

Employer
 PROCEDURES INSPECTED ANNUALLY
 INSPECTIONS PERFORMED BY -
“AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES” OTHER THAN PRIMARY
 LOCKOUT REVIEWED BETWEEN -

INSPECTOR AND AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES
 TAGOUT REVIEWED BETWEEN -

INSPECTOR AND AUTHORIZED/AFFECTED EMPLOYEES
ANNUAL INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE:
 DATE OF INSPECTION
 IDENTIFICATION OF MACHINE OR EQUIPMENT
 EMPLOYEES INCLUDED IN INSPECTION
 PERSON PERFORMING INSPECTION
RELEASE FROM LOCKOUT/TAGOUT
THE AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE MUST:
1. INSPECT WORK AREA FOR HAZARDS

2. CLEAR ALL EMPLOYEES
3. NOTIFY ALL AFFECTED EMPLOYEES
4. REMOVE ENERGY ISOLATING DEVICES
IMPORTANT POINTS TO REMEMBER
 WHERE LOCKOUT CAN BE USED:
IT MUST BE*
 WHERE LOCKOUT CANNOT BE USED:
TAGOUT PROCEDURES MUST BE INITIATED
*(Unless It Can Be Demonstrated That Full Protection Can

Be Achieved by Other Means)
GROUP LOCKOUT/TAGOUT
 FOUR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

1. Responsibility Vested in a Single Authorized Employee.
2. The Authorized Employee Must Have the Authority To
Determine Exposure Status of Group Members.
3. With Multiple Crews the Authorized Employee Must Be
Assigned the Responsibility of The Overall Job.
4. The Authorized Employee Shall Affix an Individual LO/TO
Device at the Beginning of Work and Remove It at
Completion of the Work.
GROUP LOCKOUT/TAGOUT
WHEN THE AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE IS UNAVAILABLE
 PROCEDURES MUST INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM:

1. Proof That the Employee Who Applied the Device Is
Unavailable.
2. A Valid Attempt to Inform the Employee Who Applied the
Device, That It Has Been Removed.
3. Adequate Notice to the Employee Who Applied The Device,
of the Removal of the Device Before That Employee
Returns to Work.
CONTRACTOR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS MUST:
 Inform Representatives of the Facility Of Their LO/TO

Procedures and Devices.
COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES MUST:
 Inform the Contractor of Internal LO/TO Procedures

and Devices.
 Ensure That the Contractor(S) Are Following LOTO
Procedures.
TIPS FOR USING CONTRACTORS
 Remember, You Control Your Facility!

 Review Their Procedures With Them Before Starting
the Job!
 Determine Their Safety Performance Record!
 Determine Who Is in Charge of Their People!
 Determine How They Will Affect Your Employees!
 Ensure Your Data on Your Facility Is Accurate!
KEY ELEMENTS TO AN EFFECTIVE PROGRAM
1. Develop and Strictly Adhere to LO/TO Procedures.

2. Establish and Enforce Safe Work Practices.
3. Ensure Proper Training and Supervision.
4. Strengthen and Modify Present Policies.
5. Understand the Relationship Between 29 CFR 1910.147 And
the Business or Industry Involved.
EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS
DEVICES AND TAGS MUST BE:
1. Durable
2. Standardized
3. Identifiable
4. Substantial
DEVICES AND TAGS ARE:

1. Designed to Prevent Accidental Energization.
2. Not Designed As a Substitution for Security.
CASE STUDIES IN LOCKOUT TAGOUT
CASE STUDY # 1: WORKER KILLED BY MIXING MACHINE

CASE STUDY # 2: WORKER KILLED BY HIGH VOLTAGE
CASE STUDY # 3: WORKER KILLED BY STORAGE MECHANISM
CASE STUDY # 4: WORKER KILLED BY PARTS UNLOADER
CASE STUDY # 5: DECAPITATED BY SHEARING MACHINE
CASE STUDY # 6: KILLED BY PNEUMATIC DOOR
CASE STUDY #1
WORKER KILLED BY MIXING MACHINE
NARRATIVE: An employee was assigned the task of cleaning the

inside of a sand mixer. The task was conducted
during a break in the production cycle, caused by
routine maintenance work. He did this without
anyone else’s knowledge. While he was engaged
in this, out of sight and hearing of the others, an
electrician started the machine, killing the man
inside. This plant had a written lockout procedure,
training had been given, and all affected employees
(including the deceased), were issued keys and
locks.
QUESTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED
 What caused the death of the worker?

DANGER
 Do you believe there are multiple causes?
LOCKED
 Are multiple OSHA Standard violations involved? OUT
DO NOT OPERATE
 What could upper management have done? This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by
 What could the supervisor have done? NAME: _______________

DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION

DATE: ________________
What could the co-workers have done? TIME: _________________
 To what extent was attitude responsible?

 To what extent is a lack of written policy responsible?
 To what extent is a lack of training responsible?
 Do you believe there is a single cause to this accident that,
if removed would have prevented it?
CASE STUDY #2
WORKER KILLED BY HIGH VOLTAGE
NARRATIVE: A 13,800-volt main circuit breaker was under

routine inspection. A test instrument was used to
check for electrical energy. No electrical energy
was detected at the primary power contacts in the
circuit breaker. To verify the operation of the
tester, the sensitivity was readjusted and checked
against a known 120-volt receptacle. The tester
was found to be operable. As the journeyman
electrician approached one of the contacts with a
shop towel, an explosion, engulfed him in flames.
The power from the public utility company to the
main circuit breaker had not been shut off.

 Do you believe there are multiple causes? DANGER
LOCKED

DO NOT OPERATE
What could upper management have done? This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by

DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION
 What could the co-workers have done? DATE: ________________

TIME: _________________

CASE STUDY #3
WORKER KILLED BY STORAGE MECHANISM
NARRATIVE: A stock handler entered a computer controlled

storage and retrieval area apparently to perform
stock inventory. While performing this work he
was crushed between the robot retrieval vehicle
and a third level post, when the vehicle responded
to an electronic command. It was found that even
though there were a number of disconnect
switches on the vehicle and main console none
had been used. The plant had no written lockout
procedure and workers had not been trained or
advised regarding entry into this area.

DANGER
 Do you believe there are multiple causes?
LOCKED
DO NOT OPERATE
 What could upper management have done? This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by

DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION

DATE: ________________
What could the co-workers have done? TIME: _________________

CASE STUDY #4
WORKER KILLED BY PARTS UNLOADER
NARRATIVE: The part presence switch to an unloading fixture

was sticking on an automatic transfer line. The
jobsetter removed a guard and was standing at the
side of the line to observe the operation of the
switch. He apparently leaned forward just as the
unloader actuated; it caught his right side and
crushed him between the moving unloader and the
support post for the guard. The company had a
written lockout program and the employee had
attended operator awareness training for control of
hazardous energy.

LOCKED

DO NOT OPERATE
What could upper management have done? This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by

DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION

TIME: _________________

CASE STUDY #5
DECAPITATED BY SHEARING MACHINE
NARRATIVE: An employee was removing scrap from beneath a

large shear when a fellow employee hit the control
button activating The blade. The blade cycled and
decapitated the employee cleaning scrap. The
company had no written lockout procedure and
workers had not been trained or advised regarding
the hazards associated with machinery.
LOCKED
 What could upper management have done? DO NOT OPERATE
This Lock/Tag may
only be removed by

DEPT : _______________
EXPECTED COMPLETION

TIME: _________________

CASE STUDY #6
KILLED BY PNEUMATIC DOOR
NARRATIVE: A maintenance employee was partially inside of an

asphalt mixing machine changing its paddles.
Another employee, while dusting in the control
room, accidentally hit a toggle switch which
caused the door of the mixer to close, striking the
first employee on the head and killing him. The
company had a written lockout program and the
maintenance had attended training for control of
hazardous energy.
LOCKED
 What could upper management have done? DO NOT OPERATE
This Lock/Tag may

only be removed by
What could the supervisor have done? NAME: _______________

DEPT : _______________

EXPECTED COMPLETION
What could the co-workers have done? DATE: ________________
TIME: _________________

ENERGY CONTROL PROGRAM
REVIEW
 THREE ELEMENTS OF THE PROGRAM:

1. ENERGY CONTROL PROCEDURES
2. EMPLOYEE TRAINING
3. PERIODIC INSPECTIONS
OSHA'S PERCEPTION
OF A SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM
1. Detailed Energy Control Procedures

2. Extensive Employee Training Programs
3. Periodic Reinforcement of Training
4. Sufficient Discipline Regarding Implementation
WORK AT WORKING SAFELY
Key to successful completion of any project is in Safety Training.
Building safe attitude is also a key factor in maintaining a safe
workplace. Safety is, and always will be a team effort, safety starts
with each individual employee who comes on site and concludes with
everyone leaving safe and healthy at the end of the day and
eventually to rejoin their families.

Control of Hazardous Energy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Control of Hazardous Energy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY

Snamprogetti SAFETY TRAINING

 Recognize Where Lockout/Tag-out Is Needed.

EMPLOYERS MUST: Furnish a place of employment

- Safety and Health Standards

- Lockout Tag-out Standard

HOW MOST INJURIES OCCUR

ACTIVITY AT TIME OF ACCIDENT

 Accidentally Turned on by Injured Employee

Narrative: An Employee Was Cleaning the Unguarded Side of

Citation: Failure to Shutdown or Turn off Equipment To

Narrative: An Employee Was Removing Scrap From Beneath

Citation: Failure to Shutdown or Turn off Equipment To

Narrative: An Employee Was Partially Inside of an Asphalt

Citation: Failure to Isolate Equipment From Energy Sources

 All Other Employees

Authorized and Affected Employees

 THREE ELEMENTS TO THE PROGRAM:

1. ENERGY CONTROL PROCEDURES

Lockout Is Defined as:

ACTIVE ENERGY STORED ENERGY

110 VOLTS AC HOT SURFACE

AREAS NOT REGULATED:

2. Covered Where Employees Are Required to Put A Body Part in

3. Covered Where Employees Are Required to Put A Body Part in

 SOME KEY POINTS ABOUT TAGS:

 May Evoke False Sense of Security! This Lock/Tag may

 Must Withstand Environmental Conditions!

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST: WRITTEN PROGRAM

 Review the Program on an Annual Basis.

STANDARD REQUIRES THAT:

COMMONLY USED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS

 Decision Flow Chart.

COMMONLY USED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS:

 DECISION FLOW CHART:

 LOCKOUT TAGOUT EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT FORM:

COMMONLY USED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS

 MACHINE/EQUIPMENT LISTING FORM:

COMMONLY USED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FORMS

 NON-ROUTINE TASK - (PROTECTIVE MEASURES) FORM:

1. No Potential for Residual, Stored or Re-accumulation of Energy.

2. Contains Only One Energy Source Which Is Readily Identified

3. Isolating & Locking Out Results in Complete De-Energization.

4. The Machine or Equipment Is Isolated or Locked Out During

5. One Lockout Device Will Achieve Complete Lockout.

6. The Lockout Device Is Under Exclusive Control Of An

7. Servicing/Maintenance Does Not Produce Hazards For Other

8. No Previous Energy Control Accident History Exists for the

 PROCEDURES INSPECTED ANNUALLY

 LOCKOUT REVIEWED BETWEEN -

 TAGOUT REVIEWED BETWEEN -

ANNUAL INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE:

 IDENTIFICATION OF MACHINE OR EQUIPMENT

 EMPLOYEES INCLUDED IN INSPECTION

 PERSON PERFORMING INSPECTION

THE AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE MUST:

1. INSPECT WORK AREA FOR HAZARDS

 WHERE LOCKOUT CANNOT BE USED:

TAGOUT PROCEDURES MUST BE INITIATED

*(Unless It Can Be Demonstrated That Full Protection Can

 FOUR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

WHEN THE AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE IS UNAVAILABLE