Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Posch
Posch
Securitization Process
Future Flow Beginning. In the beginning, the structured finance market was
dominated by future flow transactions secured by assets denominated in
foreign currencies. Given the relatively low ratings of most Emerging Market
sovereigns, this form of financing was only available to the biggest, most
creditworthy originators within each country. The main assets securitized in
this fashion were:
– receivables backed by future exports
– Financial future flows generated by credit card vouchers or payment rights
2004 Latin American Securitization 2005 Latin American Securitization 2006 Latin American Securitization
(total issuance US$10.9 billion) (total issuance US$14.5 billion) (total issuance US$15.3 billion)
Cross-Border / Cross-Border /
Future Flows Future Flows
61% 53%
1st Half 2007 Securitization by Country 1st half 2007 Securitization by Asset Type
(total issuance* US$5.8 billion) (total issuance* US$5.8 billion)
UAE
5%
The chart below displays the volume of EMEA Transactions in the first half of 2007
(The chart includes both South Africa and Israel)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
E
an
el
ne
a
ca
ey
an
si
si
ra
ai
rk
U
i
us
ni
fr
hs
Is
kr
O
Tu
A
Tu
R
ak
U
h
ut
az
So
K
The Latin American Domestic Market
Take Out
Future Flows Securitizations
7% 3%
Argentina
18.7% Non-performing
Assets
1%
Chile Other
2.4% MBS 22%
21%
Columbia
Brazil 4.9%
40.6% Personal / Consumer Credit-linked
Costa Rica Peru Loans Obligations
.4% .5% 5% 13%
Latin American Securitization
The below chart displays the Annual Latin America Securitization from 2000-2006
20
15 1.7
2.3
10 3.0
12.2 13.6
5 6.9 5.6
3.9 8.1
3.0
1.0 1.5 1.7 2.4
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Domestic Cross-Border Year
Investor Base
While new asset classes continue to emerge and the criteria to determine securitization
suitability becomes more complex, the basic principles to assess whether or not an
asset can be securitized remain constant:
– Known loss rates: In order to accurately assess a pool’s credit risk, there must be historical
information on the loss rate of the type of asset being securitized
– Predictable cashflow: Assets securitized to date have benefited from long histories of cashflow
driven pool analysis allowing the rating agencies to model cashflows with a reasonable degree of
confidence
– Collateral value: Credit quality is impacted not only by the obligor credit quality and historical loss
rates but also the realizable value of the underlying collateral. The ability to repossess defaulted
collateral and resell the collateral quickly with consistent historical recovery rates is valuable when
predicting cashflows
– Diversity: Pool assets are less risky if they are diverse (i.e., an obligor pool living in the same
region dependant on a single industry would be riskier than a diverse pool representing a cross
section of the economy)
– Security interest transfer: Security interest in collateral is transferred into the trust for the sole
benefit of the note holders
– Supporting information systems infrastructure: In order to execute a securitization, an issuer will
develop infrastructure to designate those assets sold, track performance, and provide data on the
securitized pool
Asset Backed Securities
Underwriter’s Role
Achieving the highest possible investment grade issuance level is likely to entail
some degree of flexibility during the negotiating process, particularly in regard to
structural changes.
Extensive experience in originating and servicing the accounts warrants favorable
enhancement levels on the part of the Rating Agencies.
Choosing a lead manager with extensive experience in managing the rating
agency process is very important for first time issuers.
Credit enhancement is utilized to achieve higher ratings on securities issued.
Typically, senior securities are structured to achieve triple-A ratings and
subordinate securities are structured to achieve single-A or triple-B ratings.
Transactions may be enhanced internally or via third parties:
Benefit Description
Provides access to triple-A funding regardless of the credit rating of the seller/servicer
Offers a cost competitive source of funds relative to many traditional debt alternatives
Efficient Means Demonstrates an alternative source of funding assets to the rating agencies and the equity market
of Funding Provides perfect match funding for the assets
Values asset portfolios at market value as opposed to book value
Benefit Description
Facilitates asset and capital management – the issuer would be positioned to either sell or retain assets
Operating Allows for expansion of servicing volume at the margin thereby reducing per cost of servicing
Efficiencies Provides increased control over asset pricing as a result of the market discipline provided by a securitization
program
Issuer /
Originator
Guarantor
Trustee
Investment Rating
Obligors Banker Agencies
Counsel
Accountant
Investors
Contact Information
Brigitte Posch
Director
Head of Latin American Securitization
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Securitized Products Group
Tel: (212) 250-4551
Email: brigitte.posch@db.com