PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF

TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE

HIGH SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
ON THE PROPOSED SEXUAL
ORIENTATION,
GENDER IDENTITY AND
EXPRESSION (SOGIE)
EQUALITY BILL
 introduction

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 introduction
As defined by the Senate Bill No. 689, Sexual
Orientation and Gender Identity or
Expression (SOGIE) Equality Bill is an act
prohibiting on the basis of SOGIE and
providing penalties thereof. Simply put, it
will serve as the law that will protect The
LGBTQ+ community from discrimination.
 introduction

But in May 2019, the said bill officially

became the longest-running bill under the
senate. But now that it had resurfaced
because of a reported discrimination
experienced by a transgender woman named
Gretchen Diez, it has became a topic of
debates because some are against and some
are in favor of it.
 introduction

The researchers believe that the

perception of Tanza National
Comprehensive High School students on the
passage of the bill before and after a video
viewing that will help the respondents decide
whether they are against or in favor is
important.
 Statement of
the Problem

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM
 This study seeks to know the perception of the Tanza NatiOnal
Comprehensive
High School Junior High school Students S.Y. 2019-2020 on the
proposed Sexual
Orientation, Gender Identity and Expression (SOGIE) Equality Bill.
It will specifically
answer the following questions:
 STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM
 1. What are the perceptions of students on
the implementation of SOGIE Equality Bill
before the symposium? After the symposium?

2. Which factor affects the perception of

students the most?
 STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM

 3. Is there a significant difference between the

JHS students in TNCHS S.Y. 2019-2020 who are in
favor and against on the implementation of SOGIE
Equality Bill before and after the symposium?
 STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM
4. What are the implications of the study for the
following?
a. Guidance Office;
b. Teen Health Kiosk;
c. The Supreme Student Government;
d. The LGBTQ+ Community; and
e. The students
 Hypotheses

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 hypotheses

• null hypothesis
There is no significant difference between
the JHS students in TNCHS S.Y. 2019-2020 who are
in favor and against on the implementation of
SOGIE Equality Bill before and after the
symposium.
 hypotheses

• alternative hypothesis
There is significant difference between the
JHS students in TNCHS S.Y. 2019-2020 who are in
favor and against on the implementation of SOGIE
Equality Bill before and after the symposium.
 Assumptions

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 assumption

1. The students of TNCHS have different

perceptions on the implementation of SOGIE
Equality Bill;

2. The symposium will affect the students’

perception and will help them decide whether
or not they are in favor or against the issue;
 assumption
3. There are certain factors that affects the
perception of the students before and after the
video showing;

4.The significant difference between the

perception of students before and after the
symposium has certain factors implications for
the Guidance Office, Teen Health Kiosk,
Supreme Student Government, LGBTQ+
Community and the students.
 Theoretical
Framework

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 Scope and
Delimitations

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 Scope and delimitations
1. The study was delimited to the
Junior High School (JHS) students of
Tanza National Comprehensive High
School (TNCHS).

2. The study focused on the

perception of JHS students on
possible passing of Sexual
Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression
(SOGIE) Bill in the senate;
 Scope and delimitations
3. The research sample consisted of
all students enrolled in the Special
Science Class (SSC), Special Program
in Journalism (SPJ), Grade 7 students of
Special Program in Foreign
Language (SPFL) and those under the
first sections of the General
Education Class (GEC) of TNCHS.
 Definition
of Terms

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 Definition of terms

• heterosexual
A gender identity wherein a person is sexually
attracted to the opposite sex. The best example
for this are straight people.
• sogie bill
One of the main reference term to describe LGBT.
Also the term to be tackled in the research.
 Definition of terms

• homosexual
A gender identity wherein a person is sexually
attracted to the same sex. Two main example of this
are gay and lesbian.
• bisexual
A gender identity wherein a person is
sexually attracted not exclusively to people of one
particular gender. Such as attracted to both men and
women.
 Definition of terms

• transgender
A gender identity wherein a person a person's sense of
personal
identity and gender does not
correspond with their birth sex.
• religion
In this study, the term is used as one of the factors that
affects the perception of the students about
the research.
 Definition of terms

• equality
In this study, the term is used as
having equal rights with people’s sex and sexual
orientation.
• discrimination
Improper treatment of different
sex and sexual orientation.
 Methodology

PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH

SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 Methodology

• Research Design
The research design used by the researchers is the
descriptive design. Through this, they were able to
easily compare the significant differences from the
data gathered.
 Methodology

• Respondents
In the study, the respondents targeted by the
researchers are the JHS students of Tanza National
Comprehensive High School. Specifically, grade 7-10
students from the SSC, SPJ, GEC, and SPFL curricula
which makes a total of 500 respondents.
 Methodology

• sampling technique
Using stratified sampling techniques, the
researchers were able to divide the selected
respondents into subgroups. The researchers
decided to do so for it is a more efficient and
convenient way of picking the respondents.
 Methodology

• research technique
As a research technique, the researchers gathered
their data by having the respondents answer a pre-
intervention survey and a post intervention survey
which is given by the end of a video viewing activity
they provided. This is to determine whether the
informative video affected the perception of the
students regarding the topic.
 Methodology

• data collection method

The researchers prepared an informative video for the
respondents to watch. This is necessary in order for
the researchers to gather the data that the
research requires.
 Methodology

• statistical tool
The Z-Test of Dependent Proportions is the statistical
tool that the researchers used for this study.
Through this, the researchers are able to
distinguish the significant differences of the
respondents’ perception before and after the
symposium prepared.
 Presentation,
Analysis and
Interpretation
of Data
PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH
SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Q1. What are the perceptions of

students on the implementation of
SOGIE Equality Bill before the
symposium? After the symposium?
Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

SSC Pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

SSC Post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Spj Pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Spj Post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Gec pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Gec post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Spfl pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Spfl post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Overall pre-intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Overall post-intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Q2. Which factor affects the

perception of students the
most?
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

In favor
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Ssc pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Ssc post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Spj pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Spj post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Gec pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Gec pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
spfl pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
spfl post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Overall pre-Intervention

236
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Overall post-Intervention
Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

against
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Ssc pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Ssc post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Spj pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Spj post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Gec pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Gec post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Spfl pre-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Spfl post-Intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Overall pre-intervention

340
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Overall post-intervention
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

computation
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 1
group the given data
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Pre-intervention survey among ssc students

In favor against
32.40% 67.63%

35.26% 64.74%

In favor against

Post-intervention survey among ssc students

 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Pre-intervention survey among spj students

In favor against
31.62% 68.38%

36.76% 63.24%
In favor against

Post-intervention survey among spj students

 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Pre-intervention survey among gec students

In favor against
43.72% 58.38%

39.90% 60.10%
In favor against

Post-intervention survey among ssc students

 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Pre-intervention survey among spfl students

In favor against
71.62% 28.38%

75.68% 24.32%
In favor against

Post-intervention survey among spfl students

 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
Pre-intervention survey (OVERALL) Post-intervention survey (OVERALL)

40.97 59.03 42.36 57.64

% % % %

• In favor
against
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 2
state the research problem/
Question
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

Is there a significant difference

between the students' response
before and after the symposium
about the proposed Sexual
Orientation and Gender Identity Bill?
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 3
set the null and alternative
hypotheses
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
H0: There is no significant difference between the
students’ response before and after the
symposium about the proposed Sexual Orientation
and Gender Identity Bill.

H1: There is a significant difference between the

students’ response before and after the
symposium about the proposed Sexual Orientation
and Gender Identity Bill.
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 4
state the level of
significance:
=0.01
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 5
State the decision rule:

DR: if Z ≥ 2.58 accept H0

if Z ˂ 2.58 reject H0
Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 6
Solve for z
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data
 
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 7
State the decision based on the
results/decision rule:
Accept the null hypothesis at
0.01 level.
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

• step 8
State the interpretation of
the result
 Presentation, Analysis and
Interpretation of Data

There is no significant difference

between the students’ response
before and after the symposium about
the proposed Sexual Orientation and
Gender Identity Bill. In such, the
symposium did not greatly affect
the students’ perception on SOGIE Bill.
 Findings,
Conclusions
and
Recommendations
PERCEPTION OF JHS STUDENTS OF TANZA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH
SCHOOL S.Y. 2019-2020
 findings

•556 or 96.53% out of 576 respondents identify

themselves as Heterosexuals.

• For the respondents who identify themselves as

part of the LGBTQ+ community there are only 20
or 3.47%.
 findings

• A total of 340 out of 576 (or 59.03% of the

total respondents) are against SOGIE Equality
Bill during the pre-intervention survey.

• On the post-intervention survey, majority of the

students are still against the bill with
59.03% of the total data.
 findings
• During the pre-intervention survey, majority of the
students who are in favor of the bill answered “I want
equality for all even for different SOGIEs” with 171 out
of 236 (or 72.46% out of the total respondents).

• Majority of the students who are in

favor of the bill chose “I want equality
for all even for Different SOGIEs+ with 189
out of 236 (or 80.08% of the total
respondents) during the post-intervention survey.
 findings
• Majority of the students who are in favor of the bill chose “I
want equality for all even for Different SOGIEs+ with 189 out
of 236 (or 80.08% of the total respondents) during the post-
intervention survey.

• During the pre-intervention survey, majority of the students

who are against the bill answered “I am against same-sex
marriage and changing the sex indicated in the birth
certificate” as the factor that affected their decision with 118
out of 330 (or 35.76% out of the total respondents)
 findings

• Majority of the students who are in favor of

the bill chose “I am against same-sex marriage
and changing the sex indicated in the birth
certificate” with 118 out of 330 (or 25.76% of
the
total respondents) during the post-
intervention survey.
 
 conclusion

• The gender identity of majority of the

respondents—heterosexual has an effect to
the results of the survey because most of the
heterosexuals are against the SOGIE Equality Bill
compared to those who identify
themselves as part of the LGBTQ+ who are the
direct beneficiaries of the bill.
 conclusion
• The overall results of the pre-
intervention survey shows that the
students of TNCHS are not yet ready for
the said bill.

• After the viewing of an informative video

advocating SOGIE Equality Bill, most of the
students are still against the bill. This
shows that the students are still not open to
welcome the LGBTQ+ community.
 conclusion

•  The religion of the students also affected

their decision. This proves that the country’s
abundant religion—Catholicism—is a factor
why most of the students are still not open to
accept the bill.
 conclusion

•  The intervention is not enough to change the

perception of the students on the bill. This
proves that the students’ perception on the
bill is definite and changing their perspective
Is not that easy.
 conclusion

•  The data also proves that the students of

TNCHS are still not ready to accept the
existence of the LGBTQ+ community as part of
their everyday lives, much more a bill that will
give them equality, legally.
 recommendations

•  The Guidance Office should hold symposiums

or seminars that tackle what the SOGIE Equality
Bill is, in order to further the knowledge of
the students and to avoid misconceptions
and misinformation that may affect their
perception.
 recommendations

•  For the Teen Health Kiosk, it is best to post

slogans and posters in the school area that
shows the advocacy of the SOGIE Equality Bill
so that the students will be able to see it
every day and could make them realize what
really the bill is for.
 recommendations

•  The Supreme School Government should

organize events that advocate equality for all
SOGIEs like School Based Pride March for
example. In this way, students can slowly open
and welcome the LGBTQ+ community.
 recommendations

•  For the LGBTQ+ community, they should

intensify their campaign for SOGIE Equality Bill;
they can go school-to-school and hold a panel
discussion for the students to realize and
might change their perspective towards the
bill.
 recommendations

•  The LGBTQ+ community can also create

informative devcoms that can be flashed in
main stream channels or be spread in social
media to reach everyone and inform them what
really SOGIE Equality Bill is about and
debunking misconceptions about it.
 recommendations

•  The students should try to be open to more

information that is available about the bill so
that they can make a stand that is information-
based and not based on the misconception and
opinion of others.