Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intervention Studies
Intervention Studies
Clinical Trial
Learning Objectives
1. Explain the distinguishing features of a clinical trial
(intervention study).
2. Recognize the differences between phase I, II, III, & IV
clinical trials.
3. Recognize the aim of randomization.
4. Define blinding with its types and explain its purpose .
5. Explain different types of clinical trial
6. Explain the purpose and design of community trials
7. Understand statistical measures in clinical trials
Categories of Clinical Studies
Interferon A
Proportion
HCV case S Sample + HCV cleared
Adjuvant
TIME
S = Sampling design
Compare with historical data of interferon only
General Design of Clinical Trial
Radical 5 years survival
mastectomy
+ radiotherapy Quality of life
Breast
Cancer S Sample R
Lumpectomy 5 years survival
+ Radiotherapy
+
Chemotherapy Quality of life
TIME
S = Sampling design
R = Randomize intervention
General Design of Clinical Trial
Overweight
and obese S Sample R
TIME
S = Sampling design
R = Randomize intervention
General Design of Clinical Trial
Proportion
Interferon A
HCV cleared
TIME
S = Sampling design
R = Randomize intervention
Cross-over Design
Group A Group B
Population
Intervention Intervention
Sample R Washout
period
Group B Group A
Placebo Placebo
Outcome Outcome
Key Elements of a Clinical Trial
1. Selection of subjects
2. Randomization: Allocation of exposure
3. Blinding
4. Data collection
5. Statistical issues
6. Ethical considerations
Clinical Trials: Selection of Subjects
1. Selection of subjects
2. Randomization: Allocation of exposure
3. Blinding
4. Data collection
5. Statistical issues
6. Ethical considerations
Clinical Trials: Randomization
Assignment of experimental units to either
treatment or control by a random process such that
neither investigator nor patient decides the
treatment to be assigned at the time the patient is
registered.
Clinical Trials: Randomization
Randomization will, on average,
balance the known and unknown risk
factors for the outcome under study.
Control Group 9
7
1
1 2 3
3 4 1
0
5 6 7 8
9 1 5
0 8
6
2 4
Intervention group
Key Points
• A random process should be used to generate treatment
allocations or assignments
• Every participant has an equal chance to receive either the
intervention or the control treatment
• Treatment allocations should be concealed until the time of
randomization – “Allocation Concealment” is critical to
prevent selection bias -- some refer to this as “blinded
randomization”. (It should not be confused with blinding of
treatments).
• Do not use LISTs but Closed envelopes!!!
Stratification
1. Randomization
2. Blinding
Key Elements of a Clinical Trial
1. Selection of subjects
2. Randomization: Allocation of exposure
3. Blinding
4. Data collection
5. Statistical issues
6. Ethical considerations
Clinical Trials: Blinding
Investigators
Analyst
Examples of Studies Where Blinding of
Treatment is Difficult / Impossible
1. Selection of subjects
2. Randomization: Allocation of exposure
3. Blinding
4. Data collection
5. Statistical issues
6. Ethical considerations
Clinical Trials: Placebo
1. Selection of subjects
2. Randomization: Allocation of exposure
3. Blinding
4. Data collection
5. Ethical considerations
6. Statistical issues
Ethical issues
• In 1964 the eighteenth World Medical Association (WMA)
meeting in Helsinki, Finland, adopted a formal code of ethics for
physicians engaged in clinical research (World Medical
Association, 1964).
1. Selection of subjects
2. Randomization: Allocation of exposure
3. Blinding
4. Data collection
5. Ethical considerations
6. Statistical issues
Clinical Trials: Statistical Issues
• Sample Size
• Determined for primary study outcome
• Must account for multiple comparisons
• Often requires statistical consultation
• Monitoring of events
• Interim analyses are performed to determine whether to stop the study
earlier than planned for.
• Sample size must be adjusted for the number of interim analyses
• Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is an independent
committee set up specifically to monitor data throughout the duration
of the study to determine if continuation of the study is scientifically
and ethically appropriate.
• Analysis
Intent-to-treat vs. Per Protocol analysis
• Intent to treat (ITT) analysis involves ALL participants that are
enrolled in the trial regardless they completed the study or not.
• Per Protocol analysis includes only those who completed the
trial
• ITT analysis is intended to avoid various misleading artifacts that
can arise in intervention research. Those dropping from the study
may have some problems,
• ITT has usually lower efficacy than per protocol analysis
Clinical Trials: Analysis
Incidencetreatment
Efficacy = 1 - = 1 - Relative Risk
Incidenceplacebo
Clinical Trials: Analysis
• Survival, or failure-time, curves
• Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
1
NNT =
Incidencecontrol - Incidencetreated
Clinical Trials: Analysis
• Survival, or failure-time, curves
• Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
1
NNT =
ARR
The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) is the number of patients you need to treat
to prevent one additional bad outcome (death, stroke, etc.). For example, if a drug
has an NNT of 5, it means you have to treat 5 people with the drug to prevent one
additional bad outcome.
NNT = 1/Absolute Risk Reduction
• First described in 1988: the number of patients that need
to be treated in order for one to benefit.
• An attractive means of summarising the results of a
clinical trial in a single figure,
• The meaning of a sentence such as ‘20 patients need to be
treated to avoid one additional death over a five-year
period’ is easily understood by both doctors and patients.
• Similar measures are reported in vaccination and screening
studies (number needed to vaccinate/screen) and their
values are derived in a similar fashion to the NNT.
Folic acid to prevent Neural Tube Defects
ITT analysis
Group TTT NTD/All Cases/100 RR (95% CI)
Folic acid Other vitamins
A + - 2/258 5/514 0.28
B + + 3/256 1%
(0.11-0.75)
C - - 11/260 18/517
D - + 7/257 3.5%
• Incidence in TTT = 1%
• Incidence in Comparative = 3.5%
𝟑.𝟓−𝟏
• Efficacy = = (1-RR) = 71%
𝟑.𝟓
𝟏𝟎𝟎
• NNT = = 40
𝟑.𝟓−𝟏
NNH = 1/Absolute Risk Increase
• A measure of how many people need to be treated (or exposed
to a risk factor) in order for one person to have a particular
adverse effect.
• For example, March et. al showed that the antidepressant sertraline
had an NNH of 64 for suicidal thoughts when used in children
and adolescents.
• This means that for every 64 patients given sertraline, one will
experienced suicidal thoughts.
• The lower the NNH, the more risk of harm; An NNH of 1 would
mean that every patient treated is harmed.
Community trials
• Community trials are usually preventive in nature
(sometimes termed Preventive Trials) e.g., vaccines and
chemo-prophylactic drugs.
• e.g., the oral polio vaccine in the early 1950s in USA.
• Community trial that has been conducted to evaluate the
effect of adding fluorides to the drinking water to
prevent dental caries.
• Randomization can be done but the unit of
randomization is “a cluster” or a group of people rather
than individuals, called randomized cluster trials