Difference Between Urban Design and Urban Planning

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN URBAN
DESIGN AND URBAN
PLANNING
BY:16602
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN URBAN DESIGN AND URBAN PLANNING.
CRITERIA URBAN DESIGN URBAN PLANNING
Definition Design of city features. The planning of city strategies policies and
structure.
Level Features Strategy
Systems Structure
Policies
Focus Design Technical
User experience Politics
Scale Micro Macro
Designing focus is on built environment This is large scale involving all infrastructure
at the block/multi block scale. of roads, public areas, buildings etc.
Work Dimension 3D 2D
Inter-connected Fields Landscape Architecture Social science
Architecture Engineering
Civil Engineering Design Science
Municipal bodies Public Administration
And Urban Planning
Similarities Sustainability, Resilience ,Quality of Life
CONSIDERATIONS OF URBAN DESIGN AND URBAN PLANNING.
URBAN DESIGN Locating activities to allow URBAN PLANNING legislation.
constructive interaction between
• Pedestrian zones them • Land Use-Optimizing the • Climate Change
• Incorporation of nature within a effectiveness of a
• Character and meaning – community's land use and
city Recognizing differences between
places infrastructure.
• Aesthetics
• Order and incident – Balancing • Economic, environmental
• Urban structure – arrangement
and relation of business and consistency and variety in the and social trends.
people urban environment
• Planning culture- Taking into
• Urban typology, density and • Continuity and change – Locating account the cultural fabric of
sustainability - spatial types and people in time and place, the city.
morphologies related to intensity respecting heritage and
of use, consumption of resources contemporary culture • Sustainability
and production and maintenance • Civil society – people are free to • Existing and potential
of viable communities interact as civic equals, important pollution and transport
• Accessibility – safe and easy for building social capital
transportation • Congestion,
• Participation / engagement –
• Legibility and wayfinding including people in the decision- • Crime
making process can be done at
• Designing places to stimulate many • Land values
public activity
• Economic development
• Function and fit – places support
their varied intended uses • Social Equity
• Complementary mixed uses – • Zoning codes and other
EXAMPLE
COMMON GOAL: TO IMPROVE A RUN-DOWN
NEIGHBOURHOOD.
ROLE OF URBAN PLANNERS: Recognising the root of
problems and finding out the requirements. They then
make known that the neighbourhood needs 2 public
parks, 3 hospitals, and 1 public library as per the financial
feasibility of the area. They will also have an estimate
what the capacity of each should be. They shall know the
social and economic impact of the project, in year one,
year five, and year ten. They shall also highlight who’d
benefit from it.
ROLE OF URBAN DESIGNERS: They can determine the
routes for transportation, the exits and entrances, how
the parks will be, the width of the streets, the look of the
buildings, and integrate the program with more accuracy.
Pedestrian traffic, density and character of
neighbourhoods, liveliness of streets, safety of streets,
location of car parks, and can design some buildings.
The limits of two disciplines intersect greatly and they can
act interchangeably from time to time. But methodwise,
urban designer tends to think as a designer, urban
planner as a planner.
References
1. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature Into Urban Design and Planning
2. Urban design and urban planning by John Spacey.(https://simplicable.com/new/urban-design-vs-urban-planning)
3. https://mcgill.ca/urbanplanning/planning
4. Orcun Tonyali, studied at Harvard University, Masters degree in Urban and Regional Planning (via Quora)

You might also like