The document summarizes the corporate powers of municipalities as outlined in Section 22 of the Local Government Code. It discusses a municipality's power to 1) have continuous succession, 2) sue and be sued, 3) have and use a corporate seal, 4) acquire and convey property, and 5) enter into contracts. It provides details on requirements for valid municipal contracts and summaries two court cases related to challenges of contracts and land conveyances.
The document summarizes the corporate powers of municipalities as outlined in Section 22 of the Local Government Code. It discusses a municipality's power to 1) have continuous succession, 2) sue and be sued, 3) have and use a corporate seal, 4) acquire and convey property, and 5) enter into contracts. It provides details on requirements for valid municipal contracts and summaries two court cases related to challenges of contracts and land conveyances.
The document summarizes the corporate powers of municipalities as outlined in Section 22 of the Local Government Code. It discusses a municipality's power to 1) have continuous succession, 2) sue and be sued, 3) have and use a corporate seal, 4) acquire and convey property, and 5) enter into contracts. It provides details on requirements for valid municipal contracts and summaries two court cases related to challenges of contracts and land conveyances.
CORPORATE POWERS SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 1. To have continuous succession in its corporate name
2. To sue and be sued
Commenced by the local executive, upon authority of the Sanggunian Exception – bring action to prevent unlawful disbursement of City funds SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 2. To sue and be sued City Council of Cebu vs Cuizon Facts: •Respondents Mayor Cuizon and Tropical Commercial Co. entered into a contract involving the purchase of road construction equipment for $520,912.00 cash from Tropical. •The City Council of Cebu filed with the CFI a complaint to nullify said contract as having been executed without prior authority from it. Complaint was dismissed for lack of legal capacity. •The lower court held that there is no provision of law authorizing the city council to sue in behalf of the city and that the authorized representative under the LGC is the city mayor for that purpose. •Hence the appeal. SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 2. To sue and be sued City Council of Cebu vs Cuizon Issue: Whether or not the city councilors have the legal capacity to question the validity of the contract entered into by the mayor. Held: Yes. Generally, suit is commenced by the local executive, i.e. the mayor, upon authority of the Sanggunian, except where the city councilors themselves and as representatives in behalf of the city, bring the action to prevent unlawful disbursement of public funds. SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 2. To sue and be sued Cannot be represented by a private attorney; only the Provincial Fiscal or Municipal attorney can represent If Provincial Fiscal is disqualified – must appear on record SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 3. To have and use a corporate seal any change shall be registered with the DILG 4. To acquire and convey real or personal property in any manner allowed by law e.g. sale, donation,
may alienate only patrimonial property
SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 4. To acquire and convey real or personal property City of Naga vs CA Facts: •Resolution was passed authorizing Provincial Governor Trivino to execute a deed of sale without consideration in favor of the City of Naga of two parcels of land with improvements, belonging to the province. Two deeds of sale were executed. •The conveyances of the said properties in favor of the City of Naga are alleged to be — Null and Void ab initio for they are against the law and public policy, since as the properties of the Province of Camarines Sur devoted to public use, they cannot be the subject matter of contracts for they are outside the commerce of man, and as donations of real properties they have not been accepted in public documents by the defendant, City of Naga." SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 4. To acquire and convey real or personal property City of Naga vs CA
Issue: Whether CA erred in nullifying the two
conveyances of land in favor of petitioner.
Held: NO. Without the needed Presidential
approval, it is evident that the conveyances were void. SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 4. To acquire and convey real or personal property in the absence of proof that the property was acquired through corporate or private funds, the presumption is that it came from the State upon the creation of the municipality and, thus, is governmental or public property procurement of supplies is made through competitive public bidding [PD526], except when the amount is minimal or in case of emergency purchases SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 5. Power to enter into contracts Requisites of a valid municipal contract:
i.) The local government unit has the express, implied
or inherent power to enter into the particular contract. ii.) The contract is entered into by the proper department, board, committee, officer, or agent. Unless otherwise provided by the Code, no contract may be entered into by the local chief executive on behalf of the local government unit without prior authorization by the Sanggunian concerned. SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 5. Power to enter into contracts Requisites of a valid municipal contract:
iii.) The contract must comply with certain substantive
requirements, i.e., when expenditure of public fund is to be made, there must be an actual appropriation and a certificate of availability of funds
iv.) The contract must comply with the formal
requirements of written contracts,e.g. the Statute of Frauds SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 5. Power to enter into contracts City of Manila vs IAC Facts: Deceased husband of plaintiff died and was buried in Lot No. 159, Block No. 194 of the North Cemetery which lot was leased by the City to Irene Sto. Domingo for the period from June 6, 1971 to June 6, 2021 per Official Receipt No. 61307 dated June 6, 1971 with an expiry date of June 6, 2021 Administrative Order No. 5, Series of 1975, dated March 6, 1975, of the City Mayor of Manila was issued. (after 5-yr lease, for exhumation) The authorities of the North Cemetery authorized the exhumation and removal from subject burial lot the remains of plaintiff’s husband, placed the bones and skull in a bag or sack and kept the same in the depository or bodega of the cemetery. Subsequently, the same lot in SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 5.Power to enter into contracts City of Manila vs IAC Issue: IAC ERRED IN HOLDING PETITIONERS HEREIN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ALLEGED TORTS OF THEIR SUBORDINATE OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES, INSPITE OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 OF THE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 409 (REVISED CHARTER OF MANILA) AND OTHER APPLICABLE JURISPRUDENCE ON THE SUBJECT EXEMPTING THE PETITIONERS FROM DAMAGES FROM THE MALFEASANCE OR MISFEASANCE OF THEIR OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES, IF THERE BE ANY IN THIS CASE.
Held: NO. Under the doctrine of respondent superior, (Torio v.
Fontanilla, supra), petitioner City of Manila is liable for the tortious act committed by its agents who failed to verify and check the duration of the contract of lease. Administrative Order No. 5, series of 1975 dated March 6, 1975 covers new leases SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 5. Power to enter into contracts Ultra Vires Contracts
• When a contract is entered into without
compliance with the first and requisites, the same is ultra vires and is null and void •Cannot be ratified or validated.
•Ratification of municipal contracts is possible only
when there is non-compliance with the second and/or the fourth requisites. Ratification may be express or implied SECTION 22. CORPORATE POWERS 6. To exercise such other powers as are granted to corporations, subject to the limitations provided in the Code and other laws End of Presentation