Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14 18
14 18
Chapter 9
Pile Foundations
Based
on the pile load tests in Mississippi and Louisiana conducted by
Coleman and Arcement (2002), it has been suggested that the unit
side-skin frictional resistance in sandy and silty soils (drained
condition) can be given as
2
According to the FHWA (2007), the unit ultimate point load can
be given as
75)
And
= 4300 kN/ (for > 75)
Also
(MN/ = 0.375 (MN/
where qc = average cone penetration resistance between 2 to 3
pile diameters below the pile tip.
where
= (for 25 kN/ 150 kN/)
The FHWA (2007) also recommends that the unit ultimate point
resistance can be given as
= 0.15
The scale effect in rock is caused primarily by randomly distributed large and
small fractures and also by progressive ruptures along the slip lines. Hence, we
always recommend that
Figure 9.27b shows a load–settlement diagram obtained from field loading and
unloading. For any load Q, the net pile settlement can be calculated as follows: When
Q = Q1,
Net settlement, = -
When Q = Q2,
Net settlement, = -
where
= net settlement
= elastic settlement of the pile itself
= total settlement © 2016 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.
8
Principles of Foundation Engineering, SI, 8 th edition Das
If the pile material is assumed to be elastic, the deformation of the pile shaft can
be evaluated, in accordance with the fundamental principles of mechanics of
materials, as
=
= load carried at the pile point under working load condition
= load carried by frictional (skin) resistance under working load condition
= area of cross section of pile
L = length of pile
= modulus of elasticity of the pile material
The magnitude of varies between 0.5 and 0.67 and will depend on the nature of the
distribution of the unit friction (skin) resistance f along the pile shaft.
Vesic (1977) also proposed a semi-empirical method for obtaining the magnitude
of the settlement of . His equation is
=
where
qp = ultimate point resistance of the pile
Cp = an empirical coefficient
Vesic (1977) also proposed a simple empirical relation similar to Eq. (9.83) for
obtaining :
=
= an empirical constant = (0.93 +16 )
In general, laterally loaded piles can be divided into two major categories
(1) short or rigid piles
(2) long or elastic piles
The following figures show the nature of the variation of the pile
deflection and the distribution of the moment and shear force along the
pile length when the pile is subjected to lateral loading.
Elastic Solution
A general method for determining moments and displacements of a
vertical pile embedded in a granular soil and subjected to lateral load and
moment at the ground surface
Consider a pile of length L subjected to a lateral force Qg and a moment
Mg at the ground surface (z=0), as shown in the figure.
(a) Laterally loaded pile; (b) soil resistance on pile caused by lateral load
kz =nh z
nh = constant of modulus of horizontal subgrade reaction
d4 x '
EpI p 4 =p
dz
= modulus of elasticity of the pile material
= moment of inertia of the pile section
d4 x
EpI p 4 +kx=0
dz
The sign conventions of x (z),q (z),M (z),V (z),p' (z) assumed in the
z z z z z
previous table are shown in the figure below.
Elastic solutions similar to those given in Eqs. 9.93 through 9.97 for piles
embedded in cohesive soil were developed by Davisson and Gill (1963)
QgR3 MgR2
xz (z) =Ax' + Bx' And Mz (z) =Am' QgR+ Bm' Mg
EpI p EpI p
(a) shear failure in soil, which is the case for short piles
(b) bending of the pile, governed by the plastic yield resistance of the pile
section, which is applicable to long piles
A solution for calculating the ultimate load resistance for short piles is
given in the figure on the next slide.
2
0.75qu
0.75qu
With cu » = =0.375qu = undrained cohesion
FS 2
Deflection of the pile head, (xz(z=0)), under working load conditions can
be estimated from the figure on the following slide
For figure A
Figure B is for clay