Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IBM, Session 4 (Entering Foreign Markets)
IBM, Session 4 (Entering Foreign Markets)
Today
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Entering Foreign Markets
12-2
Introduction
exporting
licensing or franchising to host country firms
a joint venture with a host country firm
a wholly owned subsidiary in the host country to serve
that market
12-3
Basic Entry Decisions
Answer:
12-4
Which Foreign Markets?
12-5
Timing of Entry
12-6
Timing of Entry
12-7
Timing of Entry
12-8
Scale of Entry
12-9
Entry Modes
Answer:
Firms can enter foreign market through
1. Exporting
2. Turnkey projects
3. Licensing
4. Franchising
5. Joint ventures
6. Wholly owned subsidiaries
Each mode has advantages and disadvantages
12-10
Exporting
12-11
Turnkey Projects
12-12
Licensing
3. Licensing - an arrangement whereby a licensor grants the
rights to intangible property to another entity (the licensee)
for a specified time period, and in return, the licensor
receives a royalty fee from the licensee
12-13
Franchising
4. Franchising - a form of licensing in which the franchisor
sells intangible property and requires the franchisee
agree to abide by strict rules as to how it does business
Franchising is attractive because
can avoid costs and risks of opening up a foreign
market
12-14
Joint Ventures
5. Joint ventures involve the establishment of a firm that is
jointly owned by two or more otherwise independent
firms
Joint ventures are attractive because
12-15
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries
12-16
Core Competencies and Entry Mode
12-17
Greenfield or Acquisition?
Answer:
The number of cross border acquisitions are increasing
Over the last decade, 40-80 percent of all FDI inflows
have been mergers and acquisitions
12-18
Pros and Cons of Acquisitions
Acquisitions
are quick to execute
enable firms to preempt their competitors
can be less risky than green-field ventures
However, many acquisitions are not successful
12-19
Pros and Cons of Greenfield Ventures
Answer:
Greenfield ventures are attractive because they allow the
firm to build the kind of subsidiary company that it wants
However, greenfield ventures
are slower to establish
are risky because they have no proven track record
can be problematic if a competitor enters via
acquisition and quickly builds market share
12-20