Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final DevEcon Lecture 3
Final DevEcon Lecture 3
Development
Economics: Theory and
Policy
DEVECON
Assistant Prof. C. B. Mendoza, Jr.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Operational Framework of
Economic Development
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
OUTLINE
• Mechanics of Economic Growth
• Conceptual Considerations in the
Measurement of Economic Development
• Measurement of Economic Development
• Human Development Index
• Millennium Development Goals
• Stylized Characteristics of Developing
Countries
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
Mechanics of Economic
Growth
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
• Compound interest formula
V=P(1+i) t
V is the value of money after t years/ future value
P is the principal amount deposited/ present value
I is the annual interest in decimal form
t is the number of years
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
V=P(1+i) t
V = 100 ( 1 + 0.12 ) 2
V = 100 ( 1.12 ) 2
V = 125.44
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
• Compounding Economic Growth Rates
y1 = y0 ( 1 + R ) t
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
Example: What will be the per capita income of country A if it
grows by 7% for 7 years and its base year per capita income is
$1,000?
y1 = y0 ( 1 + R ) t
y1 = 1,000 ( 1 + .07 ) 7
y1 = 1,000 ( 1.07 ) 7
y1 = 1,605.78
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
•Two major types of growth rate problems
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
•Length of Time Problems
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
• Length of Time Problems
Problem 2:
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
•Length of Time Problems
Problem 3:
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
• Growth rate problems
Problem 1:
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
• Growth rate problems
Problem 2:
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
•Growth rate problems
Problem 3:
Problem 4:
= terminal year
= base year
t = no of years
= growth rate
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic
Growth and Development
and its Characteristics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth
and Development
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic
Growth and Development
Every nation strives for development
But economic progress is not the only component
DEVELOPMENT > material & financial
Widespread realization = national context +
international economic + social system
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic
Growth and Development
FOUR APPROACHES
1. Linear stages of growth
2. Theories and patterns of structural change
3. International-dependence revolution
4. Neo-classical, free market counterrevolution
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic
Growth and Development
POST WORLD WAR II
Context:
o Struggle to rebuild
o Postwar economic boom
o Demand for consumer goods
o Flowing foreign aid to countries like PH
o PH context: Bell Trade Act (no import duties for US
products)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
LINEAR STAGES THEORY
DEVELOPMENT AS GROWTH
Post-war interest on poor nations
o Economists had no conceptual apparatus for largely
agrarian countries w/o modern economic structures
Strands of thought
o Marshall Plan: US financial and technical assistance
to war-torn European countries
o All modern industrial nations were once
underdeveloped agrarian societies
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
LINEAR STAGES THEORY
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
LINEAR STAGES THEORY
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
PROBLEMS:
o Mechanisms of development embodied in
the theory DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK
o WHY? More savings and investment are not
Sufficient
o Worked for Europe because of necessary
structural, institutional, and attitudinal
conditions
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
LINEAR STAGES THEORY
2-SECTOR SURPLUS MODEL/LEWIS THEORY
OF DEVELOPMENT
o Structural transformation of a subsistence economy
Presence of 2 sectors: overpopulated rural
sector w/ zero marginal labor productivity and
a high-productivity industrial sector
Transfer of labor from traditional to modern,
growth of product output
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
2-SECTOR SURPLUS MODEL/LEWIS THEORY
OF DEVELOPMENT
o Structural transformation of a subsistence economy
Presence of 2 sectors: overpopulated rural
sector w/ zero marginal labor productivity and
a high-productivity industrial sector
Transfer of labor from traditional to modern,
growth of product output
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
2-SECTOR SURPLUS MODEL/LEWIS THEORY
OF DEVELOPMENT
o Structural transformation of a subsistence economy
Presence of 2 sectors: overpopulated rural
sector w/ zero marginal labor productivity and
a high-productivity industrial sector
Transfer of labor from traditional to modern,
growth of product output
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
LEWIS THEORY OF DEVELOPMENT
CRITICISMS:
1. Assumes labor transfer & employment creation proportional
to capital accumulation. But what if profits invested in
laborsaving equipment?
2. Contemporary research show little surplus labor in rural
areas (except in some countries like China)
3. Urban surplus labor
4. Wages increase amid unemployment
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
o Economic, industrial and institutional structure of
an economy transformed to permit new industries
as engine of growth
o Capital accumulation + changes in economic
structure needed
o Constraints (affect level of dev’t): Internal -
resources, population size, government policies;
External – access to capital, technology, trade
(countries as part of internatl system)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
o Empirical work of Harvard economist Holllis Chenery and
his colleagues, cross-sectional and time-series studies of
countries at diff. levels of per capital income, identified
characteristic features of the development process:
Shift from agri to industrial production
Steady accumulation of physical and human capital
Change in consumer demand from basic necessities to
diverse manufactured goods
Growth of cities and urban industries
Decline in family size ad overall population
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
o Empirical work of Harvard economist Holllis Chenery and his
colleagues, cross-sectional and time-series studies of countries at
diff. levels of per capital income, identified characteristic features of
the development process:
Shift from agri to industrial production
Steady accumulation of physical and human capital
Change in consumer demand from basic necessities to diverse
manufactured goods
Growth of cities and urban industries
Decline in family size ad overall population
o Proponents of structural change model prefer “facts to speak for
themselves” unlike theories such as stages of growth
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
STRUCTURAL CHANGE MODELS
CONCLUSIONS
o Major hypothesis: development is an identifiable
process of growth and change with features similar
in all countries.
o Problem: The model does not recognize differences,
factors influencing development process.
o Limitations of emphasizing patterns over theory.
May draw wrong conclusions about causality.
o Optimistic that “correct” mix of policies will
generate beneficial patterns
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
o 1970s – International-dependence models gained
support because of disenchantment w/ stages and
structural-change models
o Resurgence in various forms in the 21st century
o Developing countries caught in a dependence and
dominance relationship with rich countries
because of institutional, political and economic
rigidities = difficulty for poor nations to be self-
reliant and independent
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
NEOCOLONIAL DEPENDENCE MODEL
o Indirect outgrowth of Marxist thinking
o Underdevelopment as result of historical evolution
of highly unequal international capitalist system of
rich country-poor country relationships
o Regardless if intentional, nations are under
unequal power relations between the center and
the periphery
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
NEOCOLONIAL DEPENDENCE MODEL
o Revolutionary struggles or major restructuring of world
capitalist system required to free dependent nations
o Theotonio Dos Santos: Dependence as conditioning
situation; Expand based on expansion of dominant
countries; Dominant countries w/ technological,
commercial, capital and sociopolitical predominance
can exploit and extract local surplus; Dependence as
based on the international division of labor – industrial
development in some and restricted in others
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
o Pope John Paul II: One must denounce the existence of
economic, financial, and social mechanisms which,
although they are manipulated by people, often function
almost automatically, thus accentuating the situation of
wealth for some and poverty for the rest. These
mechanisms, which are maneuvered directly or
indirectly by the more developed countries, by their very
functioning, favor the interests of the people
manipulating them. But in the end they suffocate or
condition the economies of the less developed countries.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
FALSE-PARADIGM MODEL
o less-radical
o Underdevelopment as result of faulty and
inappropriate advice by well-meaning, though
uninformed or biased advisers from developed
country agencies and orgs
o Inappropriate policies merely serving vested interests
of existing power groups (domestic and international)
o Intellectuals, economists, civil servants trained in
alien and “irrelevant” Western concepts
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
DUALISTIC-DEVELOPMENT THESIS
o Dualism – divergence between rich and poor
nations, rich and poor peoples on various
levels
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
4 KEY ARGUMENTS
o Different sets of conditions coexist: rich and poor, modern
and traditional (Lewis model), elites and masses, powerful
industrialized nations and impoverished peasant societies
o Chronic coexistence (not temporary) of wealth and poverty
will not be rectified in time.
o Degrees of superiority or inferiority show no signs of
diminishing and instead increases
o Superior element does little to pull up or “trickle down” to the
inferior element, may even push it down
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
INTL DEPENDENCE REVOLUTION
o IDR models, amid ideological differences, all reject the
emphasis on traditional neoclassical economic theories
o Question validity of the Lewis-type models, reject Chenery
observation of “well-defined empirical patterns” that should be
followed by poor countries
o Emphasis on international power imbalances and need for
economic, political and institutional reforms (internal & world)
o Expropriation of private assets w/ expectation that public
asset ownership and control will help address poverty &
unemployment
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
WEAKNESSES:
o Appealing explanation but no insight on how countries
initiate and sustain development
o Actual economic experience of developing countries that
pursued revolutionary campaigns of industrial
nationalization and state-run production has been mostly
negative
o Based on dependency theory, countries could pursue a
policy of autarky or inwardly directed development & trade
w/other developing countries
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
Context
o Emerged in the 1980s during political ascendancy of
conservative governments of US, Canada, Britain and
West Germany
o Neoclassicists on the board of powerful international
agencies World Bank and International Monetary
Fund as influence of International Labor Organization,
United Nations Development Program and United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development eroded
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
Argument
o Underdevelopment resulted from poor resource allocation
because of incorrect pricing policies and state
intervention(corruption, inefficiency, lack of incentives, etc.)
o State intervention slows economic growth
o Neoliberals: economic efficiency and growth will be stimulated
by free markets, privatizing state enterprises, export expansion
and eliminating government regulation and price distortions
o Allow “magic of the marketplace” and “invisible hand” to guide
resource allocation and stimulate economic dev’t
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
3 component approaches
1.
Free-market approach - markets alone are efficient; competition is
effective, technology and information freely available and costless;
gov’t is counterproductive
2.
Public choice approach - new political economy approach;
governments do nothing right because of selfish interests;
misallocation of resources
3.
Market-friendly approach – imperfections in economy and need
gov’t for market-friendly interventions (social services and climate
for private enterprise); acceptance of market failures
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
CONCLUSIONS
o Finger-pointing between dependence theorists (many from
developing countries, seeing underdevelopment as externally
induced phenomenon) and neoclassical revisionists (most
from Western economies, blame gov’t intervention and bad
economic policies)
o Market price allocation may do a better job than state
intervention but developing economies have very different
structures:
o Competitive free markets generally do not exist, information
is limited, markets fragmented, etc.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Classic Theories of Economic Growth and Development
NEOCLASSICAL COUNTERREVOLUTION
CONCLUSIONS
o Invisible hand often lifts those already well-
off, failing to offer opportunities for upward
mobility of the majority
o Lessons from supply-and-demand analysis to
arrive at “correct” prices
o “In an environment of widespread
institutional rigidity and severe
socioeconomic inequality, both markets and
governments will typically fail.”
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
RECONCILING DIFFERENCES
Each approach has strengths and weaknesses
o Controversies – ideological, theoretical or empirical – makes
the study of economic development challenging
o Evolving patterns of insights and understandings
o CONSENSUS? Significance from each approach:
Linear stages: crucial role of savings and investment
Two-sector model: transfer of resources from low to high
productivity activities, linkages between traditional &
modern
Dependence theory: importance of world economy and
decisions of developed world affecting developing economies
Neoclassical: efficient production, proper price systems
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
Conceptual Considerations in
the Measurement of
Economic Development
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
CONCEPTUAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE
MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
CONCEPTUAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE
MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
• RPCY does not
– Directly measure well-being
– Account for changes in standard of living
– Account for the living conditions of the poor
– Show the distribution of income and consumption
– Reflect purchasing power parity
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
MEASUREMENT OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Physical Quality of Life Index
• The PQLI was developed by Morris D. Morris in the 1970s.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
TWO WAYS OF MEASURING
DEVELOPMENT /
WELFARE
(According to Amartya Sen)
Goods-oriented welfare measurement of welfare in
approach (traditional terms of goods
approach)
real per capita income
approach
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
TWO WAYS OF MEASURING
DEVELOPMENT / WELFARE
(According to Amartya Sen)
Goods-oriented welfare measurement of welfare in
approach (traditional terms of goods
approach)
real per capita income
approach
Capabilities-oriented welfare measurement of welfare in
approach terms of entitlements,
capabilities, and functionings
(actual achievements)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
Personal:
what we
possess
or acquire functionings
capabilities
entitlements
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
capabilities functionings
entitlements
Freedom to choose
what to be or to do
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
capabilities functionings
chosen outcomes
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
capabilities functionings
entitlements
utility
Happiness/ satisfaction
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
capabilities functionings
entitlements
utility
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
capabilities functionings
entitlements
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
• SUMMARY
• utility/ happiness
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
SEN’S CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT
1. Development has
something to do with the
nature of life.
Expanding human
capabilities and
functionings
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
SEN’S CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT
1. Development has
something to do with the
nature of life.
2. Poverty is the failure to
Enhancing the lives we lead achieve certain basic
capabilities and
Enhancing the freedoms we functionings up to
enjoy minimally adequate levels.
Expanding human
capabilities and functionings
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
SEN’S CONCEPT OF HUMAN WELL-BEING
1. Well-being is “being
well”.
Being healthy
Being well-clothed
Being literate
Being long-lived
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Human Development Index
SEN’S CONCEPT OF HUMAN WELL-BEING
1. Well-being is “being well”. 2. In a broader sense, well-
being is
Being healthy
Being able to take part in
Being well- nourished community life
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
DIMENSIONS OF
DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS
Long and healthy life Life expectancy at birth
(Longevity)
Access to knowledge Mean years of schooling
(Education) Expected years of
schooling
Decent/Improved Real per capita GDP ( in
Standard of Living PPP$)
(Income)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
DIMENSION DIMENSION SUB-INDEX
INDEX
Life expectancy Life Expectancy none
(longevity) Index (LEI)
Access to knowledge Education Index (EI) Mean years of
(Education) schooling index
(MYSI)
Expected years of
schooling index
(EYSI)
Decent/ Improved Income Index (YI) none
Standard of Living
(Income)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
• Dimension
Index
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
MAXIMUM VALUE MINIMUM VALUE
Life Expectancy 83.7 20
(Longevity) (years) (Japan, 2015)
Mean years of 13.2 0
schooling (years) (USA, 2000)
Expected years of 20.6 0
schooling (years) (Australia, 2002)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
•
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
•
• The income index uses the formula for the
dimension index except that the logarithmic
values of the actual, minimum, and
maximum values are used.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measurement of the Human
Development Index
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
HDI MEASUREMENT
• Example:
• Data:
• Life expectancy 70 years
• Mean years of schooling 10 years
• Expected years of schooling 15 years
• Real per capita GDP 2,000 PPP$
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
CRITICISMS OF THE PQLI AND
HDI
Measurement-related objections to the PQLI
and HDI
• Choice of indicators/ variables and
weights is arbitrary
• Composite index measure
• Quality of data
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
CRITICISMS OF THE PQLI AND
HDI
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Misery Index
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Other Indexes
• Corruption Index
• Global Hunger Index
• Governance Index
• Economic Freedom Index
• Happiness Index
• Multidimensional Poverty Index (Alkire)
• Etc.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT
GOALS
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT
GOALS
GOALS GOALS
1. Eradicate extreme 5. Improve maternal
poverty and hunger health
2. Achieve universal 6. Combat HIV/AIDS,
primary education malaria, and other
diseases
3. Promote gender 7. Ensure environmental
equality and empower stability
women
4. Reduce child mortality 8. Develop a global
partnership for
development
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
GOALS
• On September 25th 2015, countries adopted a set of
goals to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure
prosperity for all as part of a new sustainable
development agenda. Each goal has specific targets
to be achieved over the next 15 years.
• The 193 member states of the United Nations (UN)
gathered to affirm commitments towards ending all
forms of poverty, fighting inequalities and increasing
country’s productive capacity, increasing social
inclusion and curbing climate change and
protecting the environment while ensuring that no
one is left behind over the next fifteen years.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
GOALS
192 member-states
Australia 2014
Rio +20
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
GOALS
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Measuring Economic Growth and
Development and its Characteristics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
• How should we call poor countries?
– economically backward, traditional?
– Third world countries?
– less developing countries?
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
• Why is per capita income low?
• Standard argument: because population is high
• Is RPCY low because population is high? Is
this always true?
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
2. Widespread poverty
• Who are the poor?
• Republic Act 8425 (Social Reform and Poverty
Alleviation Act)
• The poor are those families and individuals whose income
fall below the poverty threshold and can not afford in a
sustained manner to provide for their basic needs.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
YEAR ANNUAL PER CAPITA
(Based on the FIES POVERTY
year) THRESHOLD
2006 13,357 pesos
2009 16,871 pesos
2012 18,935 pesos
2015 21,753 pesos
2018
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
• Poverty incidence is determined based on the annual
per capita poverty threshold.
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
YEAR POVERTY POVERTY
INCIDENCE (Families) INCIDENCE
in % of total families (Population)
in % of total
population
2006 21.0 26.6
2009 20.5 26.3
2012 19.7 25.2
2015 17.9 23.5
2018 12.1 17.6
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Multi-
faceted • What causes poverty?
concern
Multi-
pronged • How do we address poverty?
approach
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Low
purchasing
power
Low Low
functionings capabilities
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Low HH budget;
Low low total spending
purchasing for G & S
power
Low Low
functionings capabilities
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Low HH budget;
Low low total spending
purchasing for G & S
power
Lack of
command over
G&S
Low Low
functionings capabilities
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Low HH budget;
Low low total spending
purchasing for G & S
power
Low Low
functionings capabilities
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
( p + t ) X = wk – z + s
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
( p + t ) X = wk – z + s
TOTAL TOTAL
EXPENDITURES PURCHASING
(ENTITLEMENTS) POWER
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Symbols used:
p = price of goods and services
t = indirect taxes imposed on goods and services
X = quantity of goods and services
w = prices paid to the resources owned by households
k = quantity of resources owned by households
wk = market income of households
z = direct taxes
s = subsidies to goods and services to which
households are politically entitled (publicly provided
goods and services or political entitlements)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
• Why does absolute poverty happen?
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
( p + t ) X = wk – z + s
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
( p + t ) X = wk – z + s
wk – z + s
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Poverty as Acquirement Problem
How do we raise the purchasing power of the poor and
consequently expand their entitlements?
INSIGHT HOW?
1. Increase the market income a) Improve the quality of assets
of poor households owned by poor households
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
3. Unequal distribution of income
• Measured by the Gini coefficient
• Gini coefficient is based on the Lorenz curve
diagram
• Range of values of the Gini coefficient
• 0 = perfect equality
• 1 = perfect inequality
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Area of inequality
Lorenz curve
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Stylized Characteristics of
Developing Countries
YEAR GINI COEFFICIENT
2006 0.4580
2009 0.4641
2012 0.4605
2015 0.4439
2018 0.4267
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Stylized Characteristics of
Developing Countries
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Stylized Characteristics of
Developing Countries
Kuznet’s Inverted
“U” Hypothesis
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment,
and disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment,
and disguised unemployment
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Stylized Characteristics of
Developing Countries
UNEMPLOYED UNDEREMPLOYED DISGUISED
UNEMPLOYED
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
5. Low productivity
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DETERMINANTS OF AVERAGE LABOR
PRODUCTIVITY
1. Quality and quantity of 5. Entrepreneurship and
human capital management
2. Quality and quantity of 6. Politics and legal
physical capital environment
3. Land and other natural
resources
4. Technology
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
5. Low productivity
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
6. Predominance of agriculture in the economy
• Why do many developing countries promote
industry at the expense of agriculture?
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
6. Smallness of the trade sector
• What are the major characteristics of the trade
sector of developing countries?
• Commodity concentration (export primary and
low-value added products; import manufactured
products)
• What are the consequences of commodity
concentration?
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
6. Smallness of the trade sector
• What are the major characteristics of the trade
sector of developing countries?
• Geographic concentration (Export destinations
are limited.)
• What are the consequences of geographic
concentration?
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
7. Market failures
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
7. Market failures
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
7. Market failures
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
7. Market failures
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
7. Market failures
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1. Low real per capita income (RPCY)
2. Widespread poverty
3. Unequal distribution of income
4. Pervasive unemployment, underemployment, and
disguised unemployment
5. Low productivity
6. Smallness of the trade sector
7. Market failures
8. Government failures (poor governance and
corruption)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
8. Government failures (poor governance and
corruption)
• What is governance?
• World Bank definition: governance is the manner
in which power is exercised in the management of
a country’s economic and social resources for
development
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Stylized Characteristics of
Developing Countries
DIMENSIONS OF GOVERNANCE
WORLD BANK BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Control of corruption Competence
Government effectiveness Legitimacy and
accountability
Political Stability and Respect for Human Rights
Absence of and Rule of Law
Violence/Terrorism
Regulatory Quality
Rule of Law
Voice and Accountability
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
8. Government failures (poor governance and
corruption)
• What is corruption?
Corruption is increasingly recognized as a preeminent
problem in the developing world.
Bribery, extortion, fraud, kickbacks, and collusion have
resulted in retarded economies, predator elites, and
political instability.
• Robert Klitgaard’s corruption framework
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
STYLIZED CHARACTERISTICS
OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics
Stylized Characteristics of
Developing Countries
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX (PHL)
(TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL)
YEAR SCORE
2010 24
2011 26
2012 34
2013 36
2015 35
2019 34
Note: 100 is the highest score (least corrupt) while 0 is the lowest score (most
corrupt)
Department of Economics
50 Years of Excellence in Economics