Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Cone Beam Computed Tomography
TOMOGRAPHY
1
CONTEN
TS
Introduction
Principles
Image Acquisition X-ray
generation
Image detection system
Image reconstruction
Image display
Clinical considerations
Imaging protocol
Comparison with CT
Artifacts
Applications in Dentistry
2
INTRODUCTI
ON
• It is also known as Dental volumetric tomography, Cone beam
volumetric tomography, dental computed tomography and cone
beam imaging.
4
4
Principles of
CBCT
Uses a cone shaped divergent beam of ionozing
•ra dia t io n lik e X - ra y s a n d a 2D
R ou n d C o ne s h a p e d X -
raayrebaedaemtector mounted on
a rotated gantry to acquiremultipalanar
sequential projection images in one single scan
around the area of
•int2e-reDst area detector
Combine with 3D x ray beam with circular
collimation – cone shaped resultant beam
•360 0 rotation around the object – both source
and Pdreotjeeccttoiornmsomunatdeedinonalal
pglaannterys at a 5
time volumetric images obtained 5
• X-ray beams attenuated by patient- detected by the receptor
6
6
IMAGE ACQUISITION
7
7
• Software programs – backprojection filters
are applied – to generate 3D volumetric
data- reconstruction of images in 3
planes.
8
4 components for CBCT
acquisition:
•X-ray generation
•Image detection system
on
•Image reconstructi
•Image display
9
9
X –ray
Generation
• Single scan of the patient is made to
acquire a data set.
• Patient positioning
• X-ray generator
• Scan Volume
• Scan factors
10
10
Patient
1.
Positioning
Equipment required
Supine Large surface area/ physical
footprint
Not for physically disabled patients
Not able to
2. Standing adjust the height
Units
in wheelchair bounded
patients
3. Seated
Most comfortable
units Not for physically
Immobilization of patients head is disabled
necessary
1
1
11
1
2
1
3
Upright patient loading and e
supin
14
X Ray
Generator
• Scan times are longer than panoramic due to pulsed
exposure.
16
16
Scan
Volume
1
7
Scan
•
•
Volume
Also called as field of view
It is the amount of area to be exposed in a single scan.
Depends on:
• Detector size
• Geometry of beam projection
• Collimation of the beam
1
8
1
9
Scan
Factors
FRAME RATE: Speed with which the images are
acquired.
Projected images / second
Image intensifier
+
Flat panel
charge coupled
device
area
detectors
Fiberoptic
coupling
22
– Flat detectors are composed of a large-area pixel array of
hydrogenated amorphous silicon thin-film transistors. X
rays are detected indirectly by means of a scintillator, such
as terbium activated gadolinium oxysulphide or thallium-
doped cesium iodide, which converts X rays into visible
light that is subsequently registered in the photo diode
array.
23
Grid distortion pattern produced by the image-intensifier detector
that affects the image construction and is noted in the image display.
When moving away from the center.
24
Image receptor area receiving the signal from the flat-panel detector’s
scintillator is flat.
Therefore, even at more distant areas from the center of the grid, there
is minimal to no distortion of the grid pattern.
25
26
Advantage of flat panel detectors;
•The configuration of such detectors is less
complicated
•Offers greater dynamic range and
•Reduced peripheral distortion
29
RECONSTRUC
TION
• Basis projection frames are process to create volumetric data set k/a
primary
reconstruction.
• Single cone beam rotations < 30 sec
• 100 – 600 individual projection frames
• Reconstruction depends on :
Acquisition parameters (voxel size, size of image field, no of projection
Hardware
Software
30
RECONSTRUC
TION
PROCESS
Once all slices have been reconstructed they combine into single volume of
DISPL
AY
• The volumetric data set is a compilation of all available
voxels.
• Reconstruction of images – 3 orthogonal planes
3
2
MULTIPLANAR
REFORMATION
Isotropic nature of volumetric data , nonaxial 2 dimension images
refers as
Multiplanar reformation. This includes :
Oblique , curved planar reformation, serial transplanar reformation.
3
5
DIRECT VOLUME RENDERING
•Simpler process
•Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP)
•MIP visualization – Evaluating each voxel
ry projection ray from
value along an imagina
eye within a parti observer’s
represent the hig
cular volume of interest and
h value as a display value
CLINICAL
CONSIDERATION
• PATIENT SELECTION
CRITERIA
• PATIENT PREPARATION
• IMAGING PROTOCOL
• IMAGE OPTIMIZATION
• REPORTS
• ARCHIVING, EXPORT &
DISTRIBUTION
37
PATIENT SELECTION
CRITERIA
40
• Removal of metallic objects – eyeglasses, jewellery, metallic partial
dentures
41
IMAGING PROTOCOL
42
VOXEL SIZE
43
Limiting the irradiation field to fit the field of view with a reduced exposure dose
to the patient and improved image quality because of reduced scattered
radiation 4
4
IMAGE
OPTIMIZATION
• To optimize image presentation & facilitate dia gnosi
it is necessary to adjust contrast/window and s
brightness/level parameters to favor bony
structures.
• CBCT software have window/level presets
• This is adjusted for each scan
• Enhancement can pe rform sharpening ,
by application of
filtering.
45
REPORT
S
46
ARCHIVING, EXPORT,&
DISTRIBUTION
• Image accuracy
• Multiplanar reformation
49
LIMITATIONS OF CONE-BEAM CT IN DENTISTRY
50
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONE BEAM CT AND
MULTISLICE CT
51
CONE BEAM CT MULTISLICE CT
Image the whole area in one rotation, Image the patient in multiple slices
then reconstruct slices
Soft tissue imaging is not as good Better contrast; soft tissues are imaged
better
Reduced artifacts from dental restorations Increased contrast; streaking artifacts are
more marked
55
Patient related
Scanner
Acquisition Artifacts related
Cone beam
related
56
ACQUISITION
ARTIFACTS
1. Beam hardening- As an x-ray beam passes
through an object lower energy photons
are absorbed in preference to higher
energy photons.
57
In clinical practice it is advisable to reduce field size , modify patient
position , separate dental arches to avoid beam hardening
58
PATIENT RELATED
ARTIFACTS
59
Motion blur, double cortices 6
0
• Motion artifact from
swallowing
61
ALAISING ARTIFACT / MOIRE PATTERN
62
63
IMAGE NOISE
64
SCANNER RELATED ARTIFACTS
6
5
CONE BEAM RELATED
ARTIFACTS
– when selected voxel size of the scan is larger than the size of object
being imaged.
Eg. A voxel of 1mm in size on a side may contain both bone and soft
tissue. Displayed pixel have different brightness value
Boundaries of image – “step” appearance “Selection of smallest
acquisition voxel “
66
• 2. UNDERSAMPLING-
Undersampling of the object can occur when too few
basic projections are provided for image reconstruction.
Reduced data sample leads to sharp edges, noisier
images
Fine striations
Importan
in the image .
ce of this artifact is in diagnosis.
67
3. CONE BEAM EFFECT
69
APPLICATIONS IN
DENTISTRY
70
• CBCT had a substantial impact on
maxillofacial imaging.
74
A diagnostic stent is made with radiographic markers and inserted at the time of scan
DICOM data imported to third party software application Assess and plan surgical &
prosthetic components
75
ORTHODONTICS & 3D
CEPHALOMETRY
76
TMJ and pharangeal airway space visualization
Ray sum technique – provide both conventional two & three
dimension cephalometric image (simulated panoramic,
posteroanterior
lateral,
cephalometric
submentovertex,
images) 7
7
7
8
3D cephalometry :
Dentaloskeletal relationships
Facial esthetics
Potential for growth &
development
79
LOCALIZATION OF
INFERIOR ALVEOLAR
CANAL
Accurate assessment of the position of canal reduce injury to the nerve while 3
molar surgeries .
Panoramic imaging is adequate but in case of superimposition 3D imaging is
advisable
80
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOIN T
•Diagnosis of bone
morphologic features,
joint space and dynamic
functions.
•Degenerative joint
disease
d
•Developmental anomaly
arthritis
of condyle
•Ankylosis
•Rheumatoi 81
82
MAXILLOFACIAL
COMPLEX
83
Fracture , widening of PDL space – suggestive of tooth subluxation
84
Benign calcifications (tonsiloliths , lymphnodes, salivary gland stones)
Phlebolith
Useful for trauma
Osteomyelitis – extent & degree of 8
5
IN ENDODONTICS
90
• DICOM data imported to proprietary software can
be used to compute 3D images generated by voxel
values which are segmented from the background.
• Does digital Radiography increases the number of intraoral radiographs. 2003. Dento
Maxillofacial Radiology ;32 (2); 124-7.
94