Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Measuring and Managing Economic Exposure
Measuring and Managing Economic Exposure
Measuring and Managing Economic Exposure
Economic Exposure
Chapter 11
1
PART I.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK AND ECONOMIC
EXPOSURE
I. FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK
Economic exposure focuses on the
impact of currency fluctuations on
firm’s value.
2
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK AND
ECONOMIC EXPOSURE
Definitions:
a. Accounting exposure (past)
impact on firm’s balance sheet
b. Economic exposure
• Transaction (contractual, present/future,
short term)
• Operating (future, long term)
3
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK AND
ECONOMIC EXPOSURE
Real Exchange Rates and Risk
Nominal vs real exchange rates
• Real rate has been adjusted for price changes,
and reflect the relative purchasing powers.
• Real rate changes may result in Hobson’s Choice:
(“We don’t like either choice!”)
When faced with a change in real value,
– do you keep price constant (changing
sales)
– do you change prices (change profits)
4
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK AND ECONOMIC
EXPOSURE
5
PART II.
THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF
EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES
A. Transaction exposure
• On-balance sheet (existing contracts)
• Off-balance sheet (contracts in the
future, leases, loan repayments)
Assumption (flawed)
LC costs and revenues remain constant
6
THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF
EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES
B. Operating Exposure : real rate change
leading to changes in relative prices and
demand for your and for competitors’
products.
Based on pricing flexibility which depends on
elasticity of demand.
– Product differentiation
8
PART III.
IDENTIFYING ECONOMIC
EXPOSURE
I. CASE STUDIES OF ECONOMIC EXPOSURE
A. APEN SKIING COMPANY
1. Firm’s exchange rate risk affected
its sales revenues.
2. Although there was no translation
risk, the global market with its
exchange rate risk and
competitors impacted market
demand.
9
IDENTIFYING ECONOMIC
EXPOSURE
B. PETROLEOS MEXICANOS (PEMEX)
1. The firm’s exchange rate risk
affected cost but not revenues.
2. Economic impact
a. Revenues: none ($ pricing)
b. Costs: decreased
c. Net effect: increased US$
flows
10
IDENTIFYING ECONOMIC
EXPOSURE
C. TOYOTA MOTOR COMPANY
1. Exchange rate risk affected BOTH
revenues and costs.
2. Trying to decrease exposure may
result in Flow back effect:
previously exported goods return
with increased domestic competition
and lower profit margins
domestically
11
PART IV.
CALCULATING ECONOMIC
EXPOSURE
A quantitative assessment of economic
exposure depends on underlying
assumptions concerning:
– future cash flows;
– sensitivity to exchange rate changes.
13
AN OPERATING MEASURE OF
EXCHANGE RISK
– Output measures:
• Estimated Beta coefficient :
measures the association of
changes in cash flows to
exchange rate changes.
• the higher the percentage
change of cash flow to
changes in exchange rates,
the greater the economic
exposure (higher beta values).
14
PART VI.
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
Operating exposure management
requires long-term operating
adjustments.
15
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
II. Marketing Management Adjustments
A. Market Selection
use pricing advantage to carve out market
share (domestic or foreign)
16
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
B. Pricing strategy:
1. If HC value falls, exporter gains
competitive advantage by increasing unit
profitability and/or market share.
2.The higher price elasticity of demand, the
more currency risk the firm faces by
product subsitution.
3. Following HC depreciation, local firm
may have much more freedom in its pricing.
17
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
C. Product Strategy
exchange rate changes may alter
1. The timing of new product
introductions/deletions
2. Product innovation
(for decreasing elasticity)
18
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
III. Product Management Adjustments
A. Input mix
B. Shift production among plants
C. Plant location
D. Raising productivity
19
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
IV. Planning For Exchange-Rate Changes
20
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
V. Financial Management of Exchange
Rate Risk: Financial manager’s Role
in Marketing and Production
21
MANAGING OPERATING
EXPOSURE
– Design the evaluation criteria so that
operating managers neither rewarded or
penalized for unexpected exchange-rate
changes.