Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PPT Jurnal
PPT Jurnal
LaryngopharyngealReflux
Published ●
22 March 2018
Publisher ●
BioMed Research International
126 Patients A mean age :
39,4 ± 21,2
70 Females 56 males years
RESULT
Groups LPR positive LPR negative p
(𝑛 = 63) (𝑛 = 63)
RESULT
Correlation
between
the SFAR
score
RESULT
(item and
total
scores) and
Ryan
score
• There was
significantly higher
frequency of positive
LPR (+) > LPR (-) AR diagnosis
in SFAR scores (𝑝<0.0001). reported in the
positive LPR group
RESULT
compared to the
negative LPR group
- Edema
To explore associations - Excessive mucous secretion
betweeen AR/AL and LPR - congestion
Methods More
objective Biopsi for detected DIS in
spesific and
oropharingeal mucosa
sensitive
Amin et al,
- More invasive
2009 - Time comsuming
- expensive
- Clinical history
Methods
- Pharyngolaryngoscopy
subjektif
- Endoscopy of upper gastrointestinal tract
CONCLUSSION
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
DIAGNOSTIC FOR LPR
(Instrumental methods)
Diagnostic for LPR