Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recycling of Rubber
Recycling of Rubber
RECYCLING
AKASH SINGH
OF RUBBER 1808026
SUBMISSION DATE:-
11/04/2020
INTRODUCTION
• Until world war-2, only natural rubber was
processed. This has the main reason behind it that
rubber plasticizer penetrated natural rubber
evenly and bond cleavage was uniform. Natural
rubber plasticizer does not penetrate synthetic
rubber particles as easily and synthetics harden
under heat and pressure.
• Less susceptible to oxidation than natural rubber.
So today’s tyre contain a mixture of synthetic and
natural rubber. Thus compared to natural rubber,
they must be grouped to a finer mesh for better
oil absorption and more active chemical
reclaiming agents must be used.
PROBLEMS RELATED TO RUBBER RECYCLING
• Disposal of rubber waste problems us because it can be
breeding place for mosquito.
• Petroleum scarcity in Europe and other parts of eastern
hemisphere have resulted in use of recycled rubber as
fuel.
• Recycled rubber is less expensive than virgin polymers
and costs less to process because it consists of a blend of
45-50% rubber hydrocarbon, sulphur, accelerators, oils
and fillers.
• In a compound using small amount of recycled rubber, it
performs like processing aid by reducing polymer
breakdown time.
• Addition of recycled rubber permits lower
calendaring temperature.
• Temperature range is broader for compounds with
recycled rubber. This also reduces shrinkage and
swelling, increasing processing rates and improves
fabric penetration.
• Extrusion compounds containing reclaim (recycled
rubber) are less thermoplastic and holds their shape.
• Reclaim acts as a mould releasing agent.
• Adhesives contain reclaim exhibit more uniform tack
over a wider temperature range.
RECLAIM RUBBER
• It is the product resulting from the treatment of
vulcanized scrap tyres, tubes and other waste
rubber articles by the application of heat and
chemical agents, permitting the product to be as
processed, compounded and vulcanized.
• Reclaiming is essentially depolymerisation.
• PROCESS OF RECLAIMING:-
Fine grinding of waste.
Separation of fibres and metals
Incorporation of reclaiming chemicals and oils
Heat treatment
Mechanical process of straining and refining
BASIC PROCESSES USED IN RUBBER RECYCLING
Devulcanization
Physical Breaking
method the three
(breaking of dimensional
rubber network
physical formed
into finer during
and smaller vulcanizatio
pieces) n
METHODS OF CHARACTERIZATION
• A non-mechanical single stage process.
• Rubber containing polar groups such as EPDM,
Polychloroprene, Chlorinated polyethylene, Nitrile
rubber etc. can be devulcanized.
• ADV;- process has volumetric heating and promotes
uniformity in devulcanization in short span.
• On devulcanization rubber was made to blend with
the raw or virgin rubber which can act as filler.
• EG;- EPDM devulcanized by microwave treatment:
• ENERGY- 70-100 watt per hour
• FREQUENCY- 915-2240MHz.
• Small particle size so that it can pass through mesh.
To check whether the rubber has devulcanized or not, it
was then blended with virgin EPDM rubber as:
10%DWR( dry weight rubber)+ 90% raw rubber.
• It results in:
Tensile strength increased from 1115 psi-
11240psi.
Slight improvement in shore A hardness from 58-
60.
• The major disadvantage comes during the
temperature control which is necessary as
exothermic reaction that takes place at 500˚F.
ULTRASONIC
• Ceiling Temperature
• Temperature at which rate of polymerization and
depolymerisation becomes equal
• Extent of depolymerisation depends on:-
• Reactivity of polymer chain radicals in chain
transfer reaction
• Activity of available chain transfer sites in
polymer.
HEATING
WIRES
1. Rubber is fed
2. N2 is purged in evaporation tube
3. The cracking products were led into
electrical Cottrell precipitator
4. The distillate are carefully rectified in
the fraction below 60ᵒC
5. Isoprene content was measured by
Famer Warren procedure
• Isoprene Content Determination
0.5g of crude isoprene fraction is heated with maleic anhydride in
benzene at 100ᵒC for 2h. Benzene is distilled off in vacuum to dryness
Gain in weight by the maleic anhydride gives isoprene content
• Chemical depolymerisation using phenylhydrazine-FeCl2system
Natural Rubber latex (60%) is stabilized by SDS and stirred until pH
reached the investigated values
Then Phenyl hydrazine and FeCl2 are added at 30⁰C
At every reaction period, a portion of sample is isolated, coagulated in
ethanol, washed several times with water, dried in a vacuum oven at
room temperature.
The degree of degradation was studied by intrinsic viscosity (measured
by Ostwald viscometer at 3O0C in toluene)
• Influence of FeCl2:- At pH = 7
• The degree of degradation was affected by the concentration of FeCl2<
0.045 mmol. But degree of depolymerisation is independent of FeCl2
above 0.045.
• At pH = 10 Initially slow rate of depolymerisation due to slower
decomposition of complex at high pH. This can be accelerated by using
high amount of FeCl2
FILLER EXTRACTION
• The fillers separated by filtration from the
treatment with tetramethylammonium
hydroxide were heated under atmospheric
pressure at 150⁰C for 5 h.
• (CH3)4NOH is easily decomposed at high
temperatures, the fillers containing this base
can be purified for re-use simply by a heating
treatment.
EXPERIMENTAL
A flask was charged with FeCl3 ( 8 mmol),
poly(dimethylsiloxane) (160 mmol) and 1-decanol( 640
mmol).
The reaction mixture was stirred at 200 °C for 24 hours.
Afterwards, water (100 mL) and HCl ( 1.0 mL) were added
and the mixture was stirred for 12 h at ambient
temperature. To the two phase system, dichloromethane (50
mL) was added.
The aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (2 ×
25 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried with
Na2SO4.
Afterwards, the fatty alcohol layer was easily separated from
the aqueous layer.
The dichloromethane was removed in vacuum.
The oligosiloxane was removed by distillation and isolated in
69% yield.
COMPACTING
• Bailing
• Baling achieves a much higher density with an
additional one-third reduction in waste volume.
• Compaction-increases waste density 40 or 50 lbs.
per cubic foot.
• Baler-increases waste densities of 60 to 75 lbs.
per cubic foot.
Types of compactor
On basis of mobility of waste:-
• Stationary equipment
• Moveable equipment
On basis of volume of waste:-
• Low-pressure (less than 7kg) compaction
• High-pressure (more than 7kg) compaction
When wastes are compressed, their volume is
reduced:-
Volume Reduction (%) = (Vi – V f \ Vi) 100
Compaction ratio = Vi\ V f
NOTE: Vi = volume of waste before compaction and
Vf = volume of waste after compaction.
Selection of compaction equipment