Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review of The Related Literature (RRL)
Review of The Related Literature (RRL)
Review of The Related Literature (RRL)
RELATED
LITERATURE(RRL)
Lesson 6
DEFINITION OF RRL
1. to find out the connection of your research to the
current conditions or situations of the world.
2. to know more about theories or concepts underlying
your research.
3. to discover the relation of your research with previous
research studies.
4. to obtain information on the accuracy or relevance of
your research questions.
5. to familiarize yourself with technical terms related to
your research.
PURPOSES OF RRL
1. TRADITIONAL REVIEW- FOR QUALITATIVE
RESEARCH
2. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW- FOR QUANTITATIVE
RESEARCH
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
1. clarifying the research questions
2. planning the research based on your understanding of
the research questions
3. searching for literature
4. listing criteria for considering the values of written
works
5. evaluating the quality of previous research studies
6. summarizing the various forms of knowledge collected.
STEPS IN CONDUCTING A
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
A kind of RRL in which you examine and combine
the results of 2 or more statistical studies for
coming out with a grand total to indicate stronger
effects of the research outcome.
Putting the result together and making them
appear as one research work to strengthen the
variables.
4 TYPES OF READING
Basic type of reading
It is by merely recognizing the words
and the literal comprehension of the
sentence.
ELEMENTARY READING
This requires time.
Wherein articles or materials are discerned if
they can be included for analysis.
This can be done by looking in the title, table
of contents, index and bibliography.
SYSTEMATIC SKIMMING
Ample time is required for this.
The process of breaking down the whole into
parts for better understanding.
An article is examined paragraph by paragraph, a
paragraph is dissected sentence by sentence and
a sentence is read word by word.
ANALYTIC READING
The highest level of reading.
The researcher analyzes several books and
articles.
The various points of view of authors are
compared and contrasted.
Generalized summary or the meta analysis of
various written works is the output of this reading.
COMPARATIVE READING
To provide justification of the study.
To identify gaps, problems, and needs of the related
studies.
To provide rationale of the study as well as the reasons
of conducting the study
To have basis that will be used to support findings of the
study.
CONDUCTING A REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
Highlighting
Annotations
IN TEXT CITATION
Use quotation marks around the quote and
include page numbers.
Ex. Samovar and Porter point out that “ language
involves attaching meaning to symbls” (p.188).
Alternatively, “ Language involves attaching
meaning to symbols” (Samovar & Porter, 1997,
p.188)
DIRECT QUOTATION
No quotation marks.
Ex. Attaching meaning to symbols is
considered to be the origin of written language
(Samovar&Porter, 1997)
INDIRECT
QUOTATION/PARAPHRASING
Ex. As Hall (199) asserts” culture also defines
boundaries of different groups” (as cited in
Samovar&Porter, 1997,p.14)
Writing the author’s name Full surname first, initials of Full surname first, full first
first and middle name name, optional initial and
Ex. middle name
Floro, J.A. EX: Floro, Joshua, Adarna
Writing the title of the Italicized with only the Underlined or italicized title
reading material beginning word capitalized with all content words
Capital for every proper noun capitalized.
Ex: The Colds Virus Ex: The Colds Virus
Writing the copyright date Written after the author’s Written after the publisher’s
name name
EX: Zobel 2015 Ex: Vibal Publishing House,
2016
REFERENCING STYLES
1. define the topic
2. search and re-search the literature.
3. take notes while reading.
4. choose the type of review you wish to write.
5. keep the review focused, but make it of
broad interest.