Add Sector: ANTOML/MI/ME/MU

Add Sector : ANTOML/MI/ME/MU
Reviewed By Huawei Approved By Huawei

Date Date
Huawei PIC Shashank Huawei PIC Poovan
Signature Signature
Approved By Maxis (RF)
Date
Maxis PIC
Signature
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 1

MEJTPG
Infill Site
Re-Engineering Add Sector

Supermoon Project
Site Name : ANTO (27/04/2020) (LTE - WCDMA)

Page 2
DU-ID
Revenue support Document Name Project Customer contract Huawei Customer Full
DU ID
& No. number No. contract No. Name
Supermoon_Northern_PAC_3G &
565338E ANTOM - MIMO - 3ML - SVC - W15W33 MY0420180843323921 00045818113820 MAXIS SDN BHD
LTE_PRE_POST_ANTO_APRIL2020
565338E ANTOM - MIMO - 3ML - SVC - W15W33 MY0420180843323922 0004581802080A MAXIS SDN BHD
565338E ANTOM - MIMO - 1ML - 1AFS - W48 MY0420190343341283 0004581900720X MAXIS SDN BHD
Supermoon_Northern_PAC_3G & ANTOM - 3MI - LMI - 10Mhz - W64 +
565338E MY0420190743350437 0004581902550K MAXIS SDN BHD
LTE_PRE_POST_ANTO_APRIL2020 (LTE Software - W69_Bulk PO)
ANTOM - 1MU - 1ML1ME1MI - 10Mhz -
56A09AQ (1MI - 10Mhz SVC) - AFSSVCsector - MY0420200243370361 0004582000270P MAXIS SDN BHD
W78W86
Supermoon_Northern_PAC_3G & ANTOM - 1MU - 1ML1ME1MI - 10Mhz -
LTE_PRE_POST_ANTO_APRIL2020 56A09AQ (1MI - 10Mhz SVC) - AFSSVCsector - MY0420200243370414 0004582000280J MAXIS SDN BHD
W78W86

Maxis LTE1800
(FTP DL, FTP UL and CSFB)
Hygiene April 27 L18 ANTOML
www.huawei.com
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.

Punchlist
Description Action Plan Target Resolution Date Responsibility Status (Open/Close)
OSS KPI

DT KPI

Others


SITE LIST
Layer RootSequenc
eNodeB Name CellNaML eNodeBID TAC DlEarfcn PCI Longitude Latitude Azimuth AntHeight(m) Mechanical Tilt Electrical Tilt RET
Name eIdx
ANTOML ANTOML_1 L1800 160200 41501 1300 351 393 100.395801 5.081041 80 57 0 6 YES
ANTOML ANTOML_L L1800 160200 41501 1300 127 164 100.395870 5.081000 160 57 0 4 YES
ANTOML ANTOME_1 L2600 160200 41501 2850 351 455 100.395801 5.081041 80 57 0 2 YES
ANTOML ANTOME_L L2600 160200 41501 2850 167 653 100.395870 5.081000 160 57 0 4 YES
ANTOML ANTOMI_1 L2100 160200 41501 249 351 7 100.395870 5.081000 110 58 0 4 YES
ANTOML ANTOMI_L L2100 160200 41501 249 167 816 100.395870 5.081000 160 58 0 4 YES
ANTOML ANTOML_B L1800 160200 41501 1300 36 618 100.395870 5.081000 240 57 2 8 YES

LTE1800 : Summary (Pre)
DL Throughput
DL Throughput (Mbps)
(Mbps)
Percentile Target KPI (Mbps) RSRP SINR DL Throughput (Mbps)
RSRP>= -95dBm /
RSRP>= -95dBm
SINR >=15dB
25% -90.05 11.00 48976.00 70448.00 83400.00
30% 22.50 -91.95 9.50 43536.00 65942.40 78733.60
50% -99.03 4.50 26976.00 47976.00 63160.00
80% 8.00 -108.34 -2.00 10260.07 25349.51 39849.60
90% -112.20 -4.50 5288.52 16783.47 30326.40
Average -97.98 5.25 33410.12 50685.11 64024.83
UL Throughput
UL Throughput (Mbps)
(Mbps)
UL Throughput
Percentile Target KPI (Mbps) RSRP SINR RSRP>=
(Mbps)
RSRP>= -95dBm -95dBm / SINR
>=15dB
25% -90.54 11.00 31962.00 50858.00 50830.00
30% 8.00 -92.45 9.50 27596.00 48216.80 48216.80
50% -99.32 4.25 12171.31 38172.00 38124.00
80% 1.00 -108.67 -2.50 1465.54 24926.40 24182.40
90% -112.69 -5.25 371.48 18508.80 16343.07
Average -98.54 5.01 18746.35 38376.28 37696.44
Items MOC MTC
CSFB Service Success Rate 100.00% 100.00%
LTECSFBServiceRequest 201 201
LTECSFBServiceSuc 201 201
LTECSFBServiceFail 0 0
WCDMA Outgoing/Incoming Call Attempt 201 201
WCDMA Outgoing/Incoming Call Setup Suc 201 201
GSM Outgoing/Incoming Call Attempt 0 0
GSM Outgoing/Incoming Call Setup Suc 0 0

LTE1800 : Summary (Post)
DL Throughput
(Mbps)
RSRP>= -95dBm /
RSRP>= -95dBm
SINR >=15dB
25% -84.38 11.40 57240.00 67968.00 89160.00
30% 22.50 -86.34 9.90 52326.40 62408.00 85564.17
50% -92.40 5.75 36376.00 46504.00 68520.00
80% 8.00 -101.05 0.33 17056.81 25312.00 47128.00
90% -105.39 -2.50 10642.42 17121.90 37680.00
Average -91.57 6.47 40933.89 49965.02 70861.20
UL Throughput
(Mbps)
UL Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -84.66 10.50 47424.00 56884.00 59632.00
30% 8.00 -86.74 9.00 42120.00 54830.40 58725.22
50% -93.17 4.75 25520.00 43516.00 52944.00
80% 1.00 -101.84 -0.75 7057.70 25496.00 34492.80
90% -106.30 -3.75 2431.89 17643.20 25324.80
Average -92.19 5.74 28555.42 41878.77 48333.18
Items MOC MTC

LTE1800 : PCI Plot (Pre)

LTE1800 : PCI Plot (Post)

CONTENTS
1 LTE1800: FTP DL
2 LTE1800: FTP UL
3 LTE1800: ANALYSIS

LTE1800 : FTP DL Summary (Pre)
DL Throughput
(Mbps)
RSRP>= -95dBm /
RSRP>= -95dBm
SINR >=15dB
25% -90.05 11.00 48976.00 70448.00 83400.00
30% 22.50 -91.95 9.50 43536.00 65942.40 78733.60
50% -99.03 4.50 26976.00 47976.00 63160.00
80% 8.00 -108.34 -2.00 10260.07 25349.51 39849.60
90% -112.20 -4.50 5288.52 16783.47 30326.40
Average -97.98 5.25 33410.12 50685.11 64024.83

LTE1800 : FTP DL Summary (Post)
DL Throughput
(Mbps)
RSRP>= -95dBm /
RSRP>= -95dBm
SINR >=15dB
25% -84.38 11.40 57240.00 67968.00 89160.00
30% 22.50 -86.34 9.90 52326.40 62408.00 85564.17
50% -92.40 5.75 36376.00 46504.00 68520.00
80% 8.00 -101.05 0.33 17056.81 25312.00 47128.00
90% -105.39 -2.50 10642.42 17121.90 37680.00
Average -91.57 6.47 40933.89 49965.02 70861.20

LTE1800 : RSRP Plot (Pre)

LTE1800 : RSRP Plot (Post)

LTE1800 : SINR Plot (Pre)

LTE1800 : SINR Plot (Post)

LTE1800 : DL Throughput (Pre)

LTE1800 : DL Throughput (Post)

CONTENTS
1 LTE1800: FTP DL
2 LTE1800: FTP UL
3 LTE1800: ANALYSIS

LTE1800 : FTP UL Summary (Pre)
UL Throughput
(Mbps)
UL Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -90.54 11.00 31962.00 50858.00 50830.00
30% 8.00 -92.45 9.50 27596.00 48216.80 48216.80
50% -99.32 4.25 12171.31 38172.00 38124.00
80% 1.00 -108.67 -2.50 1465.54 24926.40 24182.40
90% -112.69 -5.25 371.48 18508.80 16343.07
Average -98.54 5.01 18746.35 38376.28 37696.44

LTE1800 : FTP UL Summary (Post)
UL Throughput
(Mbps)
UL Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -84.66 10.50 47424.00 56884.00 59632.00
30% 8.00 -86.74 9.00 42120.00 54830.40 58725.22
50% -93.17 4.75 25520.00 43516.00 52944.00
80% 1.00 -101.84 -0.75 7057.70 25496.00 34492.80
90% -106.30 -3.75 2431.89 17643.20 25324.80
Average -92.19 5.74 28555.42 41878.77 48333.18



LTE1800 : SINR PLOT (Pre)

LTE1800 : SINR PLOT (Post)

LTE1800 : UL Throughput (Pre)

LTE1800 : UL Throughput (Post)

CONTENTS
1 LTE1800: FTP DL
2 LTE1800: FTP UL
3 LTE1800: ANALYSIS

LTE 1800 : RSRP Analysis (Post)
3 5
Highlighted area observed poor samples of RSRP as we have observed poor SINR in this area 1,3,4,5,6,8
detailed analysis has been already provided in RSRP analysis.

LTE 1800 : SINR Analysis (Post)
3 5

L1800 : RSRP SINR Analysis #1 (Post)
from SMPL
Strett View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage, spot located 5554m from site
SMPLML_3 (H:57 MT:0 ET:3)
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOML_1 from RET 6 to 4, to improve coverage area and quality
Electrical Tilt
Site Name Ant Height(m) Current Propose
ANTOML_1 57 6 4

from TPDG
from ANTO
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage, spot located 2043m from site
TPDGML_3 (H:41 MT:0 ET:4) and 2283m from sidelobe ANTOML_B (H:57 MT:2 ET:8)
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOML_B from RET 8 to 6 to improve coverage and quality
Google Street no available

Electrical Tilt
ANTOML_B 57 8 6

from ANTO
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage, spot located 2567m from
sidelobe ANTOML_B (H:57 MT:0 ET:8)
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOML_3 from RET 6 to 4, to improve coverage area and quality
Electrical Tilt
ANTOML_3 57 6 4

from BEGT
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving,spot located 1547m from site BEGTML_3 (H:55 MT:2
ET:5)
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt BEGTML_3 from RET 5 to 3 to improve coverage and make as dominant serving to improve
quality
Electrical Tilt
BEGTML_3 55 5 3

from SMPL
from SUWA
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving,spot located 2933m from site SMPLML_1 (H:57 MT:2
ET:3)
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt SUWAML_3 from RET 2 to o, to improve coverage area and quality
Electrical Tilt
SUWAML_3 48 2 0

from ANTO
from SMPL
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage,spot located 3250m from site
ANTOML_1 (H:57 MT:0 ET:6) and 5833m from site SMPLML_3 (H:57 MT:0 ET:3)
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOML_1 from RET 6 to 4 to improve coverage area and make as dominant serving for
better quality
Electrical Tilt
ANTOML_1 57 6 4

from KTWN
from SMPL
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and overshoot from sidelobe KTWNML_3 (H:50 MT:0
ET:4) with distance 4894 and 3652 from site SMPLML_3 (H:57 MT:0 ET:3). Badspot is non potensial area
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt SMPLML_3 from RET 3 to 2 to improve coverage area and make as dominant serving for
better quality
Electrical Tilt
SMPLML_3 57 3 2

from ANTO
from PIAG
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from site ANTOML_L (H:57
MT:2 ET:4) with distance 4114m
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt PIAGML_1 from RET 6 to 4 to improve coverage and quality
Electrical Tilt
PIAGML_1 70 6 4

Maxis LTE2100
Hygiene April 27 L21 ANTOMI
www.huawei.com

DL Throughput DL Throughput
Target KPI DL Throughput (Mbps) (Mbps)
Percentile RSRP SINR
(Mbps) (Mbps) RSRP>= -95dBm
RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -86.93 15.10 19757.33 30890.94 37752.05
30% 11.25 -88.92 13.80 16752.33 27811.23 35167.22
50% -96.23 9.22 9398.80 19025.24 26012.85
80% 5.00 -108.16 0.21 2696.93 8759.95 13020.47
90% -113.64 -4.27 1022.14 5386.39 9163.62
Average -96.46 8.38 13552.66 21543.52 27231.91
UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
Target KPI UL Throughput (Mbps)
(Mbps) (Mbps) RSRP>=
>=15dB
25% -90.86 14.76 12737.61 17626.82 17788.34
30% 1.00 -92.83 13.45 10703.26 17054.17 17172.19
50% -100.00 8.25 6615.24 14672.25 14816.95
80% 0.50 -111.38 -0.57 1207.44 9831.20 9738.27
90% -115.97 -4.73 339.35 8415.80 7698.23
Average
Items -99.84 7.75 MOC
7636.90
MTC
13908.20 13792.20

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -86.57 15.00 25552.00 35512.00 43148.00
30% 11.25 -88.35 14.00 22744.00 32656.00 40760.00
50% -95.20 9.50 14905.46 24240.00 33136.00
80% 5.00 -105.31 1.00 5129.65 13733.13 22027.20
90% -110.30 -5.00 1681.69 9320.35 15394.38
Average -94.78 8.54 17917.89 26471.80 34069.97
UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -87.94 15.50 17943.97 19687.23 19673.93
30% 1.00 -89.97 14.40 16693.18 19491.54 19483.35
50% -96.29 10.32 9972.89 17899.21 17961.88
80% 0.50 -105.48 2.37 4134.90 9996.00 10002.28
90% -109.35 -2.02 2204.96 9201.87 8926.27
Average
Items -95.48 9.49 MOC 11032.04
MTC 15799.74 15804.58



CONTENTS
1 LTE2100: FTP DL
2 LTE2100: FTP UL
3 LTE2100: ANALYSIS

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -86.93 15.10 19757.33 30890.94 37752.05
30% 11.25 -88.92 13.80 16752.33 27811.23 35167.22
50% -96.23 9.22 9398.80 19025.24 26012.85
80% 5.00 -108.16 0.21 2696.93 8759.95 13020.47
90% -113.64 -4.27 1022.14 5386.39 9163.62
Average -96.46 8.38 13552.66 21543.52 27231.91

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -86.57 15.00 25552.00 35512.00 43148.00
30% 11.25 -88.35 14.00 22744.00 32656.00 40760.00
50% -95.20 9.50 14905.46 24240.00 33136.00
80% 5.00 -105.31 1.00 5129.65 13733.13 22027.20
90% -110.30 -5.00 1681.69 9320.35 15394.38
Average -94.78 8.54 17917.89 26471.80 34069.97







CONTENTS
1 LTE2100: FTP DL
2 LTE2100: FTP UL
3 LTE2100: ANALYSIS

UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -90.86 14.76 12737.61 17626.82 17788.34
30% 1.00 -92.83 13.45 10703.26 17054.17 17172.19
50% -100.00 8.25 6615.24 14672.25 14816.95
80% 0.50 -111.38 -0.57 1207.44 9831.20 9738.27
90% -115.97 -4.73 339.35 8415.80 7698.23
Average -99.84 7.75 7636.90 13908.20 13792.20

UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -87.94 15.50 17943.97 19687.23 19673.93
30% 1.00 -89.97 14.40 16693.18 19491.54 19483.35
50% -96.29 10.32 9972.89 17899.21 17961.88
80% 0.50 -105.48 2.37 4134.90 9996.00 10002.28
90% -109.35 -2.02 2204.96 9201.87 8926.27
Average -95.48 9.49 11032.04 15799.74 15804.58







CONTENTS
1 LTE2100: FTP DL
2 LTE2100: FTP UL
3 LTE2100: ANALYSIS

3
2
Highlighted area observed poor samples of RSRP as we have observed poor SINR in this area 2 - 5 detailed
analysis has been already provided in RSRP analysis.

3
2

from TPDG
From ANTO
Analysis:
•Low coverage due to cell edge coverage from site TPDGMI_3 (H:41 MT:0 ET:4) with distance 1977m
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOMI_2 from RET 4 to 2, to improve coverage area
Electrical Tilt
ANTOMI_2 55 4 2

from ANTO
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from site ANTOMI_3 (H:55
Recommendation :
Electrical Tilt
ANTOMI_2 55 4 2
ANTOMI_3 55 4 2

from BGTR
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from site BGTRMI_3 (H:36.5
Recommendation :
•Antenna configuration already proper, Mechanical and Electrical with maximal tilting
Electrical Tilt
ANTOMI_2 55 4 2
ANTOMI_3 55 4 2

from SMPL
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from sidelobe SMPLMI_1
(H:57 MT:0 ET:2) with distance 2968m
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt SMPLMI_1 from RET 2 to 1, to improve coverage area and improve quality
•BGTRMI_1 already proper with maximal tilting
Electrical Tilt
SMPLMI_1 57 2 1

from SMPL
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from site SMPLMI_3 (H:57
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOMI_1 from RET 4 to 2, to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical Tilt
ANTOMI_1 55 4 2

from KRAU
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from sidelobe KRAUMI_1
(H:56 MT:0 ET:3) with distance 3419m
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt SMPLMI_3 from RET 2 to 1, to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical Tilt
SMPLMI_1 57 2 1

from PAIG
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage from PIAGMI_1 (H:70 MT:2
ET:5) with distance 3873m
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt PIAGMI_1 from RET 5 to 3, to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical Tilt
PIAGMI_1 70 5 3

L2100 : RSRP SINR Analysis # UL Missing Route (Post)
Analysis:
•Missing route in L21 UL plots due to cell edge coverage (bad coverage and bad quality), automaticly reselection to WDMA mode.

Maxis LTE2600
Hygiene April 27 L26 ANTOME
www.huawei.com

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -89.83 13.00 28648.00 37384.00 54568.00
30% 45.00 -91.58 12.00 24720.00 32824.00 50160.00
50% -98.13 7.50 12584.93 15743.34 34456.00
80% 20.00 -107.59 0.50 3582.19 4753.32 10392.73
90% -111.68 -2.50 1890.54 3007.32 6045.67
Average -97.61 7.73 19390.56 24870.92 37744.17
UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -88.13 13.00 26672.00 37266.00 40536.00
30% 15.00 -89.99 11.80 23642.40 35065.60 38136.00
50% -96.55 7.50 12434.20 28012.00 28520.00
80% 2.00 -106.04 1.00 2076.95 17876.80 18000.00
90% -110.27 -2.00 770.97 13700.66 13211.79
Average
Items -96.23 7.84 MOC
16343.97
MTC
28718.01 30064.48

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -85.56 15.00 51307.00 56592.00 73488.00
30% 45.00 -87.38 14.00 48976.00 53047.20 66779.20
50% -93.31 9.75 40095.00 44351.50 51196.00
80% 20.00 -102.50 3.29 21848.00 29307.20 38718.20
90% -106.89 0.67 14650.90 20501.60 33104.00
Average -93.08 9.96 41352.13 48043.98 58358.14
UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -86.90 16.00 37448.00 47910.00 51100.00
30% 15.00 -88.71 14.75 32966.40 45896.00 49162.40
50% -94.84 10.23 18712.00 36988.00 40208.00
80% 2.00 -103.89 3.50 4743.87 22241.60 24116.80
90% -107.96 0.75 1639.95 15205.30 16472.36
Average
Items -94.63 10.46 MOC 22870.53
MTC 36312.15 38643.91



CONTENTS
1 LTE2600: FTP DL
2 LTE2600: FTP UL
3 LTE2600: ANALYSIS

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -89.83 13.00 28648.00 37384.00 54568.00
30% 45.00 -91.58 12.00 24720.00 32824.00 50160.00
50% -98.13 7.50 12584.93 15743.34 34456.00
80% 20.00 -107.59 0.50 3582.19 4753.32 10392.73
90% -111.68 -2.50 1890.54 3007.32 6045.67
Average -97.61 7.73 19390.56 24870.92 37744.17

RSRP>= -95dBm
/ SINR >=15dB
25% -85.56 15.00 51307.00 56592.00 73488.00
30% 45.00 -87.38 14.00 48976.00 53047.20 66779.20
50% -93.31 9.75 40095.00 44351.50 51196.00
80% 20.00 -102.50 3.29 21848.00 29307.20 38718.20
90% -106.89 0.67 14650.90 20501.60 33104.00
Average -93.08 9.96 41352.13 48043.98 58358.14







CONTENTS
1 LTE2600: FTP DL
2 LTE2600: FTP UL
3 LTE2600: ANALYSIS

UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -88.13 13.00 26672.00 37266.00 40536.00
30% 15.00 -89.99 11.80 23642.40 35065.60 38136.00
50% -96.55 7.50 12434.20 28012.00 28520.00
80% 2.00 -106.04 1.00 2076.95 17876.80 18000.00
90% -110.27 -2.00 770.97 13700.66 13211.79
Average -96.23 7.84 16343.97 28718.01 30064.48

UL
UL Throughput
Throughput
(Mbps)
>=15dB
25% -86.90 16.00 37448.00 47910.00 51100.00
30% 15.00 -88.71 14.75 32966.40 45896.00 49162.40
50% -94.84 10.23 18712.00 36988.00 40208.00
80% 2.00 -103.89 3.50 4743.87 22241.60 24116.80
90% -107.96 0.75 1639.95 15205.30 16472.36
Average -94.63 10.46 22870.53 36312.15 38643.91







CONTENTS
1 LTE2600: FTP DL
2 LTE2600: FTP UL
3 LTE2600: ANALYSIS

2
1
Highlighted area observed poor samples of RSRP as we have observed poor SINR in this area 2 & 3 detailed


from TPDG
From ANTO
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage. Spot located 2311m from site
TPDGME_3 (H:41 MT:0 ET:2) and 2344m from site ANTOME_3 (H:55 MT:0 ET:1). This badspot is not
potensial area
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt TPDGME_3 from RET 2 to 0 to improve quality and coverage area
Electrical Tilt
TPDGME_3 41 2 0

from BEGT
From ANTO
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage. Spot located 2186m from
sidelobe BEGTME_3 (H:55 MT:0 ET:2) and 2507m from site ANTOME_1 (H:55 MT:0 ET:2).
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt BEGTME_3 from RET 2 to 1 to improve quality and coverage area
Electrical Tilt
BEGTME_3 55 2 1

from BGTR
From PBIA
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving spsot located 2193m from sidelobe BGTRME_1 Street View
(H:36.5 MT:0 ET:2)

Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt PBIAME_3 from RET 2 to 0 to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical Tilt
PBIAME_3 28 2 0

from PIAG
Street View
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to cell edge coverage spot located 3815m from site PIAGME_1 (H:70 MT:0
ET:2)
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt PIAGME_1 from RET 2 to 1 to improve coverage and quality
Electrical Tilt
PIAGME_1 70 2 1

4G KPIs Main KPs BH (Sec 1)




4G TA
Sec 1 Sec 2
Sec 3 Sec 4

3G Site U2100

Page 109
3G Site Design
Antenna
NodeB Name Cell ID Longitude Latitude Azimuth Cell Name P-SC UARFCN M-tilt E-titl RET
Height
ANTOMU 56581 100.395870 5.081000 80 ANTOMU_1 219 10637 58 0 4 YES
ANTOMU 10491 100.395870 5.081000 160 ANTOMU_L 443 10637 58 2 4 YES

Page 110
W2100

3G PSC W2100 (UE)
PRE POST

Page 112
3G RSCP W2100 (UE)
PRE POST

Page 113
3G ECNO W2100 (UE)
PRE POST

Page 114
3G RSCP Footprint Sector L W2100 (UE)

Page 115
3G ECNO Footprint Sector L W2100 (UE)

Page 116
W2100 : RSCP Analysis (Post)
2
3
4
1 5
6
7
9 8
Highlighted area observed poor samples of RSCP as we have observed poor ECNO in all badspot area, detailed

W2100 : SINR Analysis (Post)
2
3
4
1 5
6
7
9 8

W2100 : RSCP ECNO Analysis #1 (Post)
from BEGT
From ANTO
Analysis:-
•Low coverage and quality due to cell edge coverage, badspot located 4Km from site BEGTMU_8 (H:55
MT:2 ET:6) and 2.5Km from site ANTO (H:57)
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOMU_3 from RET 4 to 2 to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
Height(m) Current Propose
ANTOMU_3 57 4 2

from BEGT
Street View
Analysis:-
•Low coverage and quality due to cell edge coverage, badspot located 1596m from site BEGTMU_8 (H:55
MT:2 ET:6)
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt BEGTMU_8 from RET 6 to 4 to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
BEGTMU_8 55 6 4

from BEGT
From BGTR
Analysis:-
•Low coverage and quality due no dominant serving, spot located 2254m from site BEGT (H:55) and 2958
from site BGTR (H:36,5)
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt BEGTMU_6 from RET 5 to 4 to improve coverage area and improve quality
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
BEGTMU_6 55 5 4

from BGTR
From SUWA
Analysis:-
•Low coverage and quality due no dominant serving and cell edge covarege, spot located 2336m from
sidelobe BGTRMU_2(H:36.5 MT:0 ET: 0) and 2970m from sidelobe SMPLMU_1 (H:57 MT:0 ET:2)
Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt SUWAMU_3 fro RET 5 to 3 to cover badspot area,improve coverage and quality
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
SUWAMU_3 57 5 3

from BEGT
From ANTO
Analysis:-
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and cell edge coverage spot located 3053m from site
BEGTMU_7 (H:55 MT:2 ET:6) and 2539m from site ANTOMU_6 (H:55 MT:0 ET:4) Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOMU_6 from RET 4 to 2 to, improve quality and coverage area
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
ANTOMU_6 55 4 2

from SMPL
From ANTO
Analysis:-
SMPLMU_3 (H:57 MT:0 ET:2) and 3111m from site ANTOMU_1 (H:58 MT:0 ET:4) Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt ANTOMU_1 from RET 4 to 2 to, improve quality and coverage area
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
ANTOMU_1 55 4 2

from SMPL
From KRAU
Analysis:-
SMPLMU_3 (H:57 MT:0 ET:2) and 3693m from site KRAUMU_1 (H:56 MT:0 ET:3). That badspot is non Street View
potesial area
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt SMPLMU_3 from RET 2 to 1 to, improve quality and coverage area
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
SMPLMU_3 57 2 1

from PIAG
From ANTO
Analysis:-
PIAGMU_1 (H:70 MT:4 ET:5) and 4155m from site site ANTOMU_1 (H:58 MT:0 ET:4) Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt PIAGMU_1 from RET 5 to 4 to, improve quality and coverage area
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
PIAGMU_1 70 5 4

from ANTO
From TPDG
Analysis:
•Low coverage and quality due to no dominant serving and overshoot spot located 3450m from site
PIAGMU_3 (H:70 MT:4 ET:4) and 3306m from site site ANTOMU_L (H:58 MT:0 ET:4) Street View
Recommendation :
•Propose uptilt TPDGMU_2 from RET 4 to 2 to, to make as dominant serving to improve quality and
coverage area
Electrical
Ant
Site Name
TPDGMU_2 26 4 2

3G OSS KPI’s W2100 & W900
Low Attempt Criteria
Category Index Name KPI Committed CellName Samples KPI Values Comments Remark
(1 week)
ANTOMU_1 23970 <2000 99.84 PASS 　
Voice Call Setup
CS I2 CSSR>=98.5% ANTOMU_2 101197 <2000 99.97 PASS 　
Success Rate [%]
12.2kbps ANTOMU_3 19972 <2000 99.90 PASS 　
Voice ANTOMU_1 7179 <2000 0.21 PASS 　
AMR Voice Drop Call Rate
I5 DCR <=1% ANTOMU_2 25813 <2000 0.06 PASS 　
[%]
ANTOMU_3 5992 <2000 0.10 PASS 　
ANTOMU_1 1563 <1000 96.29 PASS 　
3G to 2G Handover
3G/2G CS IRAT : ANTOMU_2 14681 <1000 99.27 PASS 　
I11 Success Rate for 12.2
Transition >96% ANTOMU_3 1060 <1000 97.36 PASS 　
kbps Voice AMR [%]
ANTOMU_L 987 <1000 98.89 PASS 　
Low Attempt Criteria

Category Index Name KPI Committed CellName Samples KPI Values Comments Remark
(1 week)
ANTOMU_1 10056 <1000 0.59 PASS 　
I12 PS Drop Rate [%] PS Drop < 2.5% ANTOMU_2 6014 <1000 0.28 PASS 　
ANTOMU_3 2266 <1000 0.14 PASS 　
PS Data
ANTOMU_1 82071 <2000 97.16 PASS 　
PS Call Setup Success PS CSSR >
I13 ANTOMU_2 84595 <2000 97.28 PASS 　
Rate [%] 95%
ANTOMU_3 37139 <2000 98.35 PASS 　
ANTOMU_1 2049390 <2000 99.81 PASS 　
3G Soft Handover
I14 SHO>=97% ANTOMU_2 1195330 <2000 99.90 PASS 　
Success Rate
ANTOMU_3 1144707 <2000 99.89 PASS 　
Mobility ANTOMU_1 2896 <1000 96.62 PASS 　
3G Inter-Frequency
ANTOMU_2 1136 <1000 97.18 PASS 　
I15 Handover Success IFHO>=95%
ANTOMU_3 302 <1000 97.02 PASS 　
Rate
ANTOMU_L 3493 <1000 98.48 PASS 　

129
Thank
Thank You!
You!

Add Sector: ANTOML/MI/ME/MU

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Add Sector: ANTOML/MI/ME/MU

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Add Sector : ANTOML/MI/ME/MU

Reviewed By Huawei Approved By Huawei

Approved By Maxis (RF)

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 1

Re-Engineering Add Sector

Site Name : ANTO (27/04/2020) (LTE - WCDMA)

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 2

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 3

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 5

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 6

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 7

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 8

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 9

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 10

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 11

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 12

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 13

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 14

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 15

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 16

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 17

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 18

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 19

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 20

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 21

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 22

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 23

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 24

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 25

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 26

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 27

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 28

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 29

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 30

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 31

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 32

Google Street no available

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 33

Google Street no available

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 34

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 35

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 36

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 37

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 38

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 39

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 41

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 42

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 43

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 44

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 45

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 46

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 47

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 48

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 49

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 50

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 51

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 52

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 53

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 54

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Confidential Page 55