The document discusses strategies for understanding how raters process information when evaluating ratees. It explains that raters observe behavior, encode the information, store it in memory, and retrieve relevant details when reviewing performance dimensions to determine ratings. Raters can make errors in observation by focusing on non-performance factors, in storage and recall by remembering information in trait form rather than details, and in the actual evaluation process which can be influenced by its purpose. Common factors like appearance, race, change over time, traits, and context can influence ratings.
The document discusses strategies for understanding how raters process information when evaluating ratees. It explains that raters observe behavior, encode the information, store it in memory, and retrieve relevant details when reviewing performance dimensions to determine ratings. Raters can make errors in observation by focusing on non-performance factors, in storage and recall by remembering information in trait form rather than details, and in the actual evaluation process which can be influenced by its purpose. Common factors like appearance, race, change over time, traits, and context can influence ratings.
The document discusses strategies for understanding how raters process information when evaluating ratees. It explains that raters observe behavior, encode the information, store it in memory, and retrieve relevant details when reviewing performance dimensions to determine ratings. Raters can make errors in observation by focusing on non-performance factors, in storage and recall by remembering information in trait form rather than details, and in the actual evaluation process which can be influenced by its purpose. Common factors like appearance, race, change over time, traits, and context can influence ratings.
Strategy 3: Understand How Raters Process Information The Rater • Observes the behavior of a ratee • Encodes the ratee behavior • Stores information in memory, which subject to both short- and long-term • When evaluating a ratee: Review the performance dimensions Retrieve stored observation to determine their relevance to performance dimensions • The information is reconsidered and integrated with other available in formation as the rater decides on the final ratings. Common Errors in Appraising Perfomance Errors in the Rating Process • Raters should notice only performance-related factors when they observe employee behavior. Common Errors in Appraising Perfomance Errors in Observation (Attention) Generally, researchers have varied three type of input information to see what raters pay attention to when they are collecting information for performance appraisal. First, it appears that raters are influenced by general appearance characteristics of the raters. Race also matters in performance ratings. Researchers also look at change in performance over time to see if this influences performance rating. Common Errors in Appraising Perfomance Errors in Storage and Recall • Research suggests that raters store information in the form of traits. • More importantly, they tend to recall information in the form of trait categories. Errors in the Actual Evaluation The context of the actual evaluation process
also can influence evaluation. Several
researchers indicate that the purpose of an evaluation affects the rating process. Common Errors in Appraising Perfomance Factors that lead raters to give inaccurate appraisals: • Guilt • Embarrassment about giving praise • Taking things for granted • Not noticing good or poor performance • The halo effect • Dislike of confrontation • Spending too little time on preparation of the appraisal _x0000_