Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal Aspects of Management: Indian Contract Act, 1872
Legal Aspects of Management: Indian Contract Act, 1872
1st SESSION
SEMINAR 1
20 .09.2019
Course Code – GM 201
© Amitava Banerjee
(i) Contracts made before the war: These contracts may either be suspended or
dissolved. Contracts will be dissolved if they are against the public policy or
if their performance would help the enemy.
(ii) Contracts made during the war: During the continuance of war, an alien enemy
can neither 'contract with an Indian citizen' nor can he sue in an Indian court. He
can sue in an Indian court only after receiving permission from the central
government
Drunkards
But where the judgment of one party was, to the knowledge of the
other part, seriously affected by drink, equity will generally refuse
specific performance at the suit of the other.
JAIPURIA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES - NOIDA 20-09-2019
Session – 1 : ICA 1872
Free consent
“Meeting of minds on same thing and same sense”
No free consent
1. Coercion (Section 15) :It is committing, or threatening to commit,
any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code (XLV of 1860), or the
unlawful detaining or threatening to detain, any property to the
prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any
person to enter into an agreement.
Burden of Proof: The party avoiding the contract has to prove that
Coercion was exercised upon him and his consent received is not voluntary
or he has not exercised his consent freely.
Coercion need not necessarily be directed by a party to the contract.
It may or may not emanate from a stranger to the contract.
it may be aimed at any person, either a party to the contract or a stranger
to the contract.
JAIPURIA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES - NOIDA 20-09-2019
Session – 1 : ICA 1872
No free consent
2. Undue Influence (S.16)
Where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one
of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and
uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
Person is said to dominate the will of another. (a) where he holds a
real or apparent authority over the other, or where he stands in a
fiduciary relation to the other; or (b) when he makes a contract
with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently
affected by reason of age, illness, or mental or bodily distress.
Burden of proof : the burden of proving that such contract was not
induced by undue influence shall lie upon the person in a position to
dominate the will of the other.
Effect of Misrepresentation:
The party being affected by misrepresentation has got the following rights: (1) He can
avoid or revoke the contract; or
(2) He can affirm the contract and insist on the misrepresentation to be made good, if
it is possible to do so; or
(3) He can rely upon the misrepresentation as a defence to an action of the contract.
Fraud Misrepresentation
Party’s intention is to deceive the other Party does not have any intention to
party and get the benefit from him, deceive. It makes a careless
while in Misrepresentation the misstatement of facts of only.
Gives two rights to the aggrieved party, Only one right, to avoid the contract
a right to action for damages and also
to avoid the contract
The defendant can not take the plea that Defendant is allowed to take this plea in
plaintiff had means to discover the case of misrepresentation
truth
Party defrauding the other can be Such is not the case in
prosecuted for cheating under I.P.C. misrepresentation
Stranger’s act may account to coercion Undue influence can be exercised only
by one of the parties to the contract.
Coercion gives a right to the effected Court may set aside the contract
party to repudiate the contract absolutely or modify the terms