Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Closed End (Serpentine But Not Looped) - Open End: Khandekar 04
Closed End (Serpentine But Not Looped) - Open End: Khandekar 04
Closed End (Serpentine But Not Looped) - Open End: Khandekar 04
Khandekar ‘04
Operating Regimes
Static Slug/Plug distribution, generation of small bubbles at high
temps. similar to nucleate boiling
Critical Heat Flux
Oscillatory slug/plug flow develops in individual loops
Heat flux
References
1.Khandekar, S., 2004, “Thermo-hydrodynamics of Closed Loop Pulsating Heat Pipes,” Institut fur Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme der Universitat Stuttgart.
2.Ma., H. B., Borgmeyer, B., Cheng, P., Zhang, Y., 2008, “Heat Transport Capability in an Oscillating Heat Pipe,” Journal of Heat Transfer, 130(8), pp. 81501-
1-7.
3.Borgmeyer, B., 2005, “Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Investigation of A Pulsating Heat Pipe for Electronics Cooling,” Master’s Thesis, University of
Missouri-Columbia.
Modeling
• OHP modeling has focused on the “simpler” slug/plug flow regime
• Multiple modeling approaches have been tried
– Chaos
– Continuity, Momentum & Energy
– Spring-Mass-Damper
– Non-Dimensional Analysis
– Artificial Neural Networks
• Our model has its roots in the spring-mass-damper models presented
by Ma, Borgmeyer, et al.2,3
• EES/MATLAB based thermo-hydrodynamic model of an OHP operating in
slug-plug flow.
d 2 x C dx K B
dt 2
mtot dt mtot
x
mtot
cos 0
Evaporator Adiabatic Region Condenser
.
Q
Tc
Vapor Plug
Liquid Slug
The OHP Advantage and Project Goals
• Advantages
– OHPs are simpler/lighter than other two-phase heat transfer devices
• No wick
• No additional fluid reservoir
– OHPs may be more robust?
• Dry-out problems, while not extensively studied, do not appear to be a major
problem…OHPs may be able to handle higher heat fluxes (convective
heat transfer vs. phase change)
– May be used as a thermal switch
• Disadvantages
• Lower effective conductance than Capillary Pumped Loops and Loop Heat
Pipes