Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Application of Real Blood and Synthetic Blood For Blood Spatter Pattern Determination On Various Matrices
Application of Real Blood and Synthetic Blood For Blood Spatter Pattern Determination On Various Matrices
Application of Real Blood and Synthetic Blood For Blood Spatter Pattern Determination On Various Matrices
Arrive at Conclusions
Operational Framework
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Effect of Release Height on the Diameter and
Shape of Bloodstains
Shapes of Bloodstains
Dropped from Different Heights
Shape of Bloodstain
Solid Surface
Real Blood Synthetic Blood
10 – 20 cm
30 – 70 cm
> 70 cm
Generalshape of bloodstains: Circular and smooth for
drop heights of 10 cm and 20 cm.
Shape of Bloodstain
Solid Surface
Real Blood Synthetic Blood
Carpet
White Towel
Linoleum
Metal
Cardboard
White Tile
White Cloth
The shape of bloodstains on non-porous and smooth
surfaces:
- Less distorted or are more circular and symmetrical
compared to that of porous surfaces.
- Similar for both real and synthetic blood
The angle of impact was around 30o - 40o for most of the
solid surfaces, except for the cloth
- The stains were almost of similar diameter and angle
range
The cardboard and metal plate had irregular grooves on
the surface, producing distorted stains.
- The size of synthetic bloodstains was relatively larger
than real bloodstains on these surfaces
Droplets of real blood on the towel, carpet, white cloth
and paper were larger due to the porous surface
characteristic.
Atangle of impact 45o - 20o, all bloodstains showed
drip patterns with satellite spatter
Atthe angle of impact of 90o - 60o, all the
bloodstains had elongated tails, with little spatter
and wave cast off
As the angle of impact decreased from 90o - 20o,
blood droplets increased in diameter but decreased
in tail length
Bothsynthetic and real blood samples showed
similar blood spatter pattern on matrices studied
except for linoleum.
General Shape of Bloodstains
at different angles of impact
Effect and Reconstruction of
Medium and High Velocity Blood Droplets
Medium
40 36 43
Synthetic Velocity
blood
High Velocity 36 90 36
Area of impact of medium velocity reconstruction Area of impact of high velocity reconstruction
for real blood - (a) Front view and (b) Top view for real blood - (a) Front view and (b) Top view
Area of impact of medium velocity reconstruction for Area of impact of high velocity reconstruction for
synthetic blood - (a) Front view and (b) Top view synthetic blood - (a) Front view and (b) Top view
CONCLUSIONS
Real blood and synthetic blood have similar droplet
characteristics, thus the use of synthetic blood as a
substitute for real blood in experiments dealing with
bloodstain spatter is suitable.
The bloodstain spatter on solid surfaces was shown to be
affected by surface type, height of release and the angle of
travel or impact.
Real blood showed a more pronounced pattern as it sticks
to the surfaces much better than synthetic blood, although
both blood specimens showed a consistent blood drop
spatter pattern.
Themultiple impact sites, origin and point of
divergence study showed that for medium velocity
droplets, synthetic blood gave higher angles.
Athigh velocity, the angles were almost equal for
both real and synthetic blood. The angles were
approximately 17o-43o for all sides, except for the
center of the high velocity droplets which were 90o.
Theanalysis of bloodstain patterns at crime scenes
should be based on detailed scientific knowledge and
requires considerable case experience
REFERENCES
[1] C. Knock, and M. Davidson, Predicting the position of
the source of blood stains for angled impacts, J.
Forensic Sci., 52, 2007, 1044–1049.
[2] W.F. Rowe, Errors in the determination of the point of
origin of bloodstains, Forensic Sci. Int., 161, 2006, 47–
51.
[3] T. Bevel and R.M. Gardner, Blood Pattern Analysis
With an Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction.
New York: CRC Press Inc. 1997, 157-167
[4] L.L. Akin, Blood Interpretation at Crime Scenes. The
Forensic Examiner. Gale: Summer Inc., 2005, 25-43
[5] T.P. Sutton, Bloodstain Pattern Interpretation, Short
Course Manual, Memphis TN: University of Tennessee,
1998, 25-3
Acknowledgement
I would like to convey my deepest gratitude to
Puan Hanim Awab &
Tuan Azari Abd Rahman
(my supervisors)
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Umi Kalthom Ahmad
All my Forensic Science Lecturers
My fellow MSc (Forensic Sci) students
Research Assistants & Lab assistants
‘THANK YOU’