Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Office of Social Sector Development:: Performance Management Plan Workshop
Office of Social Sector Development:: Performance Management Plan Workshop
2
Workshop Objectives
By the end of the workshop participants’ knowledge of
USG strategy and reporting processes will be
strengthened.
3
Cross Cutting Issues:
• Gender Equality and
Female Empowerment
• Youth Participation
• Capacity Development
RESULTS FRAMEWORKS &
Performance Management Plans (PMPs)
5
Development Hypothesis – describes the theory of
change, logic and causal relationships between the
building blocks needed to achieve a long-term result.
It is based on development theory, practice, literature,
and experience, is country-specific, and explains why
and how the proposed investments lead to achieving
the project Goal. Can be expressed in a short narrative
that explains each layer of results in the RF, upwards
from the sub-IRs to IRs to the Goal using If-Then
statements.
6
Goal:
Highest Level Result effected by the Project.
If Objectives 1-3 are reached then the project can achieve the goal
Sub-IR 1.1.1 Sub-IR 1.1.2 Sub IR 2.1.1 Sub IR 2.2.1 Sub IR 3.1.1 Sub IR 3.2.1 Sub IR 3.3.1
Sub-IR 1.1.3 Sub IR 1.1.4 Sub IR 2.1.2 Sub IR 3.1.2 Sub IR 3.3.2
Results Statements
9
Results Frameworks – Things to Avoid
• Results statement combines more than one
activity/component
• Results statement explains how the result will be
achieved
• Results statement refers to actors or responsible parties
• Results statement is at the wrong level – i.e. its an
objective-level result but in the RF its listed as an IR
• The RF includes more results than could realistically be
achieved during the LOP
10
Example: Education
Goal: Increased # of school aged children through education
services across Afghanistan by providing standard, quality-driven Project, Version 1
education services under the leadership of the MoE
Sub IR 3.1.3:
Financial
management
capacity of the MoE
strengthened
Where do Results Statements Fit in the PMP???
Indicator # Performance Indicator Data Sources Methods of
Indicator Definition and Data Collection
Unit of
Measure
Goal: Equitable access to schools for children, especially girls, in marginalized areas increased
Indicator #1
Objective 1: Equitable access to schools for children, especially girls, in marginalized areas increased
Indicator #2
Indicator #3
Intermediate Result 1.1 (IR): Student enrollment increased
Indicator #4
Sub-Intermediate Result 1.1.1 (Sub-IR): Student enrollment in remote areas increased
Indicator #5
13
Results Frameworks – Key Takeaways
• Every project should have one
• Remember logical progression – IF-THEN
linkages
• Results Statements should read like a
newspaper headline and describe the end result
achieved
• The RF should be drafted before work begins on
the PMP
14
Components of a Performance
Management Plan
15
Performance Management Plan (PMP) – is a tool
to plan and manage the process of monitoring,
evaluating and analyzing progress towards
achieving results identified in the RF in order to
inform decision-making, resource allocation,
learning and adapting project activities.
16
Performance Management Plan Components
• Results Framework
• Performance Indicator Tracking Table
– Performance Indicators
– Definitions of Key Indicator Terms
– Baselines
– Targets
– Target Rationales
– Actuals (Results achieved)
– Data Collection Methods and Staff Responsible
17
PMP Components, Cont’d
• Performance Indicator Reference Sheets (PIRS)
• Data quality assessment plan
• Evaluation Plan
– Type of Evaluation
– Timeframe
– Draft evaluation questions
18
Performance Indicators – measure a particular
characteristic or dimension of a project’s results based
on the project’s RF. Performance indicators are the
basis for observing progress and measuring actual
results compared to expected results. Performance
indicators help answer the extent to which the project
is progressing towards its objectives.
19
Things to consider when developing and selecting
Performance Indicators:
• Indicators are needed for each level of the RF and for each results
statement
• The number of indicators selected should be sufficient (not too
few not too many) to measure progress towards the expected
result
– Rule of thumb: 1-3 indicators per results statement
• Cost and utility
– The greater the number of indicators the greater the cost to collect the
data
– Only collect data that will be useful to have
• Select indicators that have already been developed and defined
20
PMP Components Cont’d
• Definition of Key Terms – if not done can create
problem of definition bias.
• Baseline – measurements taken prior to or at the
outset of an intervention
• Actuals – Actual results for each indicator.
– Reflect indicator data that has been collected, verified and
reported at a specific time interval after the baseline has
been established.
– As compared to data that has been planned or projected,
such as a target.
21
PMP Components Cont’d - Targets
• Targets – Specific planned level of change from
the baseline to what is expected to be achieved
within an explicit time frame.
• Target Setting – based on projections using data
available from a variety of sources known to the
project.
• Also see Handout – USAID Works! Preparing a
Performance Monitoring Plan
22
Example
• The result you seek to achieve is, “employment of targeted youth
increased.”
• Your baseline is how many in the targeted group of youth are
unemployed
– “30,000 youth in the target group are unemployed at the start of the project.”
• Your target is based on research of employment statistics in targeted
geographic regions and findings from past youth employment
interventions
– “15,000 unemployed youth from the target group the end of the 3-year project”.
Percent of health Essential HMIS, health Health facility Quarterly 78% 85% 100% 100%
facilities stocked drugs as facility managers
with essential drugs defined by inventory compile
MoPH reports quarterly
during reporting Essential pharmacy
period Drugs List inventories…
29
PMP Components, Continued
• Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS)
– Project must develop a PIRS for each new or custom indicator
in the PMP
– USAID Standard F Indicators already have a PIRS with very
specific definitions and information on how to record the data
If you are using a Standard F indicator in your PMP you cannot
change the indicator at all!
30
Sample Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS)
31
Evaluation – the systematic collection and analysis
of information about the characteristics and
outcomes of projects as a basis for judgments to
improve effectiveness and/or to inform decisions
about current and future programming. Evaluation
is distinct from assessment, which may be designed
to examine country or sector context.
32
PMP Components, Continued
• Evaluation Plan
– Evaluation is part of the Program Cycle
– Should be part of every project PMP
– Should be timed so that findings can be used for
decision-making, i.e., at the mid-term of the project
or if there will be a follow-on
33
An Evaluation Plan should contain the following information:
Evaluation POC Project to Project Evaluation Internal Est. Evaluation
Questions be Start & Type or Budget Start and
Evaluated End External End Dates
Dates
1) To what extent M&E Family Start: Final, External $180,000 Start:
did the family Officer Performance
planning project Planning Oct. 2012 Jan. 2014
increase capacity of Project
local family
planning centers? End: End: Mar.
Mar.2015 2014
2) Did use of
modern family
planning methods
increase in target
areas?
34
Performance Plan Indicators for Health & Education
1. Standard Indicators – Bureau of Foreign Assistance (F) Master
Indicator List (MIL)
USG Standard or “F” indicators are organized in accordance with the Foreign
Assistance Standardized Program Structure (SPS) which is a hierarchy of
Objective, Program Areas, Program Elements and Program Sub-Elements.
Indicators are mainly associated with measuring performance at the Program
Area and Element levels within each of the five objectives.
2. Custom Indicators
Custom Indicators are measures that USAID Missions use in combination with
standard indicators to monitor progress towards intended results. Many
measures that USAID can select as custom indicators are widely used across the
development community (example, GDP growth per capita). Custom indicators
are also those developed for to measure a specific project or activity when no
equivalent standard indicator is available.
35
OSSD- Health Standard Indicators (3)
• 3.1.2.9-1: Number of individuals trained in any
component of the WHO Stop TB Strategy with
USG funding
• 3.1.6.8-4: Number of liters of drinking water
disinfected with point-of-use treatment
products as a result of USG assistance
• 3.1.7.1-1: Couple years protection in USG
supported programs
36
OSSD- Health Custom Indicators (8)
• Percent of estimated number of new smear-positive pulmonary TB cases that
were detected under DOTS (i.e. Case Detection Rate).
• Number of deliveries with a skilled birth attendant (SBA) in USG-assisted
programs
• Number of antenatal care (ANC) visits by skilled providers at USG-assisted
facilities
• Number of new antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy at USG-assisted
facilities
• Number of postnatal care (PNC) visits to USG-assisted facilities
• Number of children less than 12 months of age who received PENTA 2 vaccines
• Rate of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases occurring per 100,000
children less than 15 years of age (non-polio AFP rate)
• Number of USG-assisted service delivery points providing FP counseling or
services 37
OSSD- Education Standard Indicators (5)
• 3.2.1-3: Number of administrators and officials successfully
trained with USG support
• 3.2.1-14: Number of learners enrolled in primary schools
and/or equivalent non-school based settings with USG support
• 3.2.1-33: Number of textbooks and other teaching and
learning materials (TLM) provided with USG assistance
• 3.2.1-35: Number of learners receiving reading interventions
at the primary level
• 4.6.3-2: Number of persons receiving new or better
employment (including better employment) as a result of
participation in USG-funded workforce development project 38
OSSD-Education Custom Indicators (3)
• Number of teachers/educators trained with
USG support
• Number of higher education partnerships
between US and host country higher education
institutions that address regional, national
and/or local development needs
• Number of USG-funded scholarship and
exchange programs conducted through higher
education institutions 39
Developing Performance Indicators
A GROUP EXERCISE
40
Group Exercise Instructions
• “Sticky-note Brainstorming”
• Goal – In a small group identify and build
consensus around a “best” set of performance
indicators to measure results in the RF.
• Materials – Flip charts, package of sticky notes,
pens or markers
• Also refer to handout – PMP Indicator Criteria
Worksheet
41
Group Exercise Instructions
• Step 1: Write a single results statement on flip chart paper. Can use Newspaper Headline
from earlier.
• Step 2: Review the result statement in your group and ensure everyone has the same
understanding, then pass out materials.
• Step 3: Each participant thinks about indicators for the group’s results statement. Each
person writes their ideas down on sticky-notes – one idea per one sticky note.
• Step 4: Participants group indicators together on a blank piece of flip chart paper, the wall
or the table. As participants group the “like” indicators together the grouping can evolve
as the indicators are discussed.
• Step 5: For each grouping of similar indicators, the participants should collectively select
the best from each group.
• Step 6: The best indicators are posted on the results statement flip chart. Participants
then discuss when they think particular indicators are good or not good measure of the
results statement.
• Step 7: The group narrows down the top 1-3 indicators to measure the result.
42
Using a PMP to Track Performance
44
Example: PMP as a
Management Tool
45
QUESTIONS???
46