Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction To Merger and Acquisitions
Introduction To Merger and Acquisitions
Agency
Agency problem
problem and
and
Efficiency Theories Managerialism
Managerialism
Free
Free Cash
Cash Flow
Flow hypothesis
hypothesis
Information
and Signaling
Synergy
Synergy Benefits
Benefits
Agency Problems
Market
Market Share
Share
Agency Problems
Differential Efficiency
Tax
Tax motives
motives
Diversification reason Managerialism
Diversification reason Managerialism
1. Differential Efficiency: Some firms operate below their potential. Such firms
are suitable to acquisition by other firms which are more efficient. For
example if the management of firm X is more efficient than the management
of the firm Y, and if firm X acquires firm Y, the efficiency of firm Y is likely to be
brought up to the level of firm X. However, a limitation is that it may result in
to the acquiring firm paying too much premium for the acquired firm due to
over optimism about improving the performance of the acquired firm.
2. Synergy benefits:It is based on the assumption that the value of a combined
firm is worth more than the value of the firms taken separately. (i.e. 2 + 2 = 5)
VAB = VA + VB + X
VA = Value of acquiring firm before merger
VB = Value of target firm before merger
VAB = Value of combined firm after merger
X = Present value of cash benefits resulting from merger
Types of Synergies:
Operating Synergy
Financial Synergy
Dr. Praveen Kr.Sinha, Assocate Professor,
Managerial Synergy
DSATM
o Operating synergy is when the value and performance of
two firms combined is greater than the sum of the separate
firms apart and, as such, allows for the firms to increase
their operating income and achieve higher growth.
Operating economies are maximum in Horizontal merger
due to the reasons that duplicate facilities can be eliminated.
o Financial synergy: Impact of merger or acquisition on the
reduced cost of capital of acquiring firm or the newly formed
firm. A merged firm is able to take the advantage of new
financial opportunities because of the firm’s increased size of
capital base.
o Managerial Synergy (Theory of Managerial Efficiency):
Impact of merger or acquisition on the reduced cost of
managing the firm. Some mergers/acquisitions are benefited
due to the fact that the acquirer’s management can better
manage the target’s resources.
It is based on the assumption that two firms have different
levels of managerial competence.
Dr. Praveen Kr.Sinha, Assocate Professor,
InDSATM
the case of conglomerate merger, economies are
3. Firms indulge in diversification to overcome concentration risk (risk due to being
in one business).
It helps to stabilize the firms earnings
Greater the combination of the firms of independent business, the higher will be
the reduction in the business risk and greater will be the benefit of diversification
and vice versa.
Merger between two unrelated firms would tend to reduce business risk, which in
turn, reduces the discount rate / required rate of return (i.e. K e) of the firm’s
earnings (as investors are generally risk averse) and thus, increases the market
value.
Diversification benefit is found in conglomerate type of merger.
Diversification into unrelated products in which the firm has no competitive
advantage should be avoided.
Example: Several investment banks (exposed to vagaries of stock market and have
highly volatile earnings) acquired asset management firms (having stable stream of
earnings) to reduce volatility of the earnings stream.
1. Market Share: Mergers are undertaken to improve ability to set and maintain
prices above competitive level. Increase in the size of the firm is expected to result
in market power.
2. Tax motives
Benefit of carry forward and set-off of unabsorbed business losses and depreciation u/s
72A
Exemption of capital gain arising on the transfer of shares by the transferor company to
the transferee company u/s 44.
Exemption from sales tax on the transfer of goods within the company.
Example:
Absorption of Ahmedabad Cotton Mills Ltd. (ACML) by Arvind Mills (in 1979) resulted
into a tax benefit of Rs.2 crores in the next two years after merger. The ACML was closed
in 1977 due to labour problems and it had an accumulated losses of Rs.3.34 crores.
Takeover of Sidhpur Mills by Reliance (in 1979) also resulted into tax benefit. Reliance
got the benefit of carry forward and setting-off of the accumulated losses of
Rs.2.47crores.
Dr. Praveen Kr.Sinha, Assocate Professor,
DSATM
MERGERS AND INDUSTRY LIFE CYCLE