The document discusses whether a company, Argnil Co, should purchase a new $1.5 million machine to replace its existing outdated machine. It provides production forecasts and costs associated with the new machine over its 4-year lifespan. It determines that using a nominal net present value approach, purchasing the new machine is financially acceptable due to its positive NPV. It then discusses why a company may have limited investment finance even with attractive opportunities. Specifically, it notes that investment finance may be limited if a potential investment increases business or financial risk beyond a company's existing risk profile reflected in its weighted average cost of capital.
The document discusses whether a company, Argnil Co, should purchase a new $1.5 million machine to replace its existing outdated machine. It provides production forecasts and costs associated with the new machine over its 4-year lifespan. It determines that using a nominal net present value approach, purchasing the new machine is financially acceptable due to its positive NPV. It then discusses why a company may have limited investment finance even with attractive opportunities. Specifically, it notes that investment finance may be limited if a potential investment increases business or financial risk beyond a company's existing risk profile reflected in its weighted average cost of capital.
The document discusses whether a company, Argnil Co, should purchase a new $1.5 million machine to replace its existing outdated machine. It provides production forecasts and costs associated with the new machine over its 4-year lifespan. It determines that using a nominal net present value approach, purchasing the new machine is financially acceptable due to its positive NPV. It then discusses why a company may have limited investment finance even with attractive opportunities. Specifically, it notes that investment finance may be limited if a potential investment increases business or financial risk beyond a company's existing risk profile reflected in its weighted average cost of capital.
Argnil Co is appraising the purchase of a new machine, costing $1·5
million, to replace an existing machine which is becoming out of date and which has no resale value. The forecast levels of production and sales for the goods produced by the new machine, which has a maximum capacity of 400,000 units per year, are as follows:
Year 1 2 3 4
Sales volume 350,000 380,000 400,000 400,000
(units/year) The new machine will incur fixed annual maintenance costs of $145,000 per year. Variable costs are expected to be $3·00 per unit and selling price is expected to be $5·65 per unit. These costs and selling price estimates are in current price terms and do not take account of general inflation, which is forecast to be 4·7% per year.
It is expected that the new machine will need replacing in four
years’ time due to advances in technology. The resale value of the new machine is expected to be $200,000 at that time, in future value terms. The purchase price of the new machine is payable at the start of the first year of the four-year life of the machine.
Working capital investment of $150,000 will already exist at
the start of the four-year period, due to the operation of the existing machine. This investment in working capital is expected to increase in nominal terms in line with the general rate of inflation. Argnil Co pays corporation tax one year in arrears at an annual rate of 27% and can claim 25% reducing balance tax- allowable depreciation on the purchase price of the new machine. The company has a real after-tax weighted average cost of capital of 6% and a nominal after-tax weighted average cost of capital of 11%. Required:
(a) Using a nominal terms net present value approach,
evaluate whether purchasing the new machine is financially acceptable. (10 marks)
(b) Discuss the reasons why investment finance may be
limited, even when a company has attractive investment opportunities available to it. (5 marks) Answer(a) The investment in the new machine has a positive net present value and is therefore financially acceptable. Answer(b) The current weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of a company reflects the required returns of existing providers of finance, such as the cost of equity of shareholders and the cost of debt of providers of debt finance, for example, banks and loan note holders. The cost of equity and the cost of debt depend on particular elements of the existing risk profile of the company, such as business risk and financial risk. Providing the business risk and financial risk of a company remain unchanged, the cost of equity and the cost of debt, and hence the WACC, should remain unchanged. Turning to investment appraisal, the WACC could be used as the discount rate in calculating the present values of investment project cash flows. Since the discount rate used should reflect the risk of investment project cash flows, using the WACC as the discount rate will only be appropriate if the investment project does not result in a change in the business risk and financial risk of the investing company. One of the circumstances which is likely to leave business risk unchanged is if the investment project were an expansion of existing business activities. WACC could therefore be used as the discount rate in appraising an investment project which looked to expand existing business operations. However, business risk depends on the size and scope of business operations as well as on their nature, and so an investment project which expands existing business operations should be small in relation to the size of the existing business. Financial risk will remain unchanged if the investment project is financed in such a way that the relative weighting of existing sources of finance is unchanged, leaving the existing capital structure of the investing company unchanged. While this is unlikely in practice, a company may finance investment projects with a target capital structure in mind, about which small fluctuations are permitted. If business risk changes as a result of an investment project, so that using the WACC of a company in investment appraisal is not appropriate, a project-specific discount rate should be calculated. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) can be used to calculate a project-specific cost of equity and this can be used in calculating a project-specific WACC.