This document discusses liability for dangerous premises and obligations of occupiers. It covers duty of care owed to lawful visitors like invitees and licensees, as well as trespassers and children. The occupier must use reasonable care to prevent damage from known dangers to invitees. Licensees must be warned of latent defects. Structures by highways require reasonable care. Landlords are liable for dangerous defects. Trespassers enter at their own risk unless traps exist. Children require higher protection. Liability of dangerous chattels and obligations of their transferors are also discussed.
This document discusses liability for dangerous premises and obligations of occupiers. It covers duty of care owed to lawful visitors like invitees and licensees, as well as trespassers and children. The occupier must use reasonable care to prevent damage from known dangers to invitees. Licensees must be warned of latent defects. Structures by highways require reasonable care. Landlords are liable for dangerous defects. Trespassers enter at their own risk unless traps exist. Children require higher protection. Liability of dangerous chattels and obligations of their transferors are also discussed.
This document discusses liability for dangerous premises and obligations of occupiers. It covers duty of care owed to lawful visitors like invitees and licensees, as well as trespassers and children. The occupier must use reasonable care to prevent damage from known dangers to invitees. Licensees must be warned of latent defects. Structures by highways require reasonable care. Landlords are liable for dangerous defects. Trespassers enter at their own risk unless traps exist. Children require higher protection. Liability of dangerous chattels and obligations of their transferors are also discussed.
This document discusses liability for dangerous premises and obligations of occupiers. It covers duty of care owed to lawful visitors like invitees and licensees, as well as trespassers and children. The occupier must use reasonable care to prevent damage from known dangers to invitees. Licensees must be warned of latent defects. Structures by highways require reasonable care. Landlords are liable for dangerous defects. Trespassers enter at their own risk unless traps exist. Children require higher protection. Liability of dangerous chattels and obligations of their transferors are also discussed.
Duty towards invitee Duty towards licensee Structures adjoining highway Liability of landlord 2)Obligation towards trespassers 3)Obligation towards children Obligation towards lawful visitors Occupiers liability act, 1957 Duty towards an invitee Reasonable care to prevent any damage from any Unusual danger , which the occupier knew or ought to have known Indermaur v Dames, 1866 Cates v Mongini Bros, 1971 Pillutla Savitri v G.k. kumar, 2000
Duty towards a Licensee. Who enters the premises with the
express or implied permission , for his own purpose rather than for the occupier’s interest. Occupier has an obligation to give due warning of any latent defect or concealed danger of which he was aware. He has no liability for the loss caused by dangers not known to him Roles v Nathan, 1963 Section 57 of Indian easements act, 1882 says, Grantor's duty to disclose defects.-The grantor of a license is bound to disclose to the licensee any defect in the property affected by the license, likely to be dangerous to the person or property of the licensee, of which the grantor is, and the licensee is not, aware. 58. Grantor's duty not to render property unsafe.-The grantor of a license is bound not to do anything likely to render the property affected by the license dangerous to the person or property of the licensee. Swimming pool accidents Klaus v east India Hotels
Structures adjoining Highways
Kallulal v Hemchand, 1958 Municipal corporation of Delhi v Subhagwanti, 1966 Noble v Harrison Liability of landlord Mint v Good, 1951
Obligation towards trespassers
Lowrey v Walker, 1911 Mokshada Sundari v Union of India, 1971 Nature of Duty Mourton v Poulter, 1920 Ramanuja mudali v m. Gangan, 1984 Cherubin v State of Bihar, 1964
Obligation towards children
Glasgow Corporation v taylor, 1922 Liability of dangerous chattels The liability of the transferor of the chattel under two heads •Liability towards the immediate transferee •Liability towards the ultimate transferee
•Liability towards the immediate transferee
•Ward v Hobbs, 1878 •Hyman and wife v Nye sons, 1881 •Liability towards the ultimate transferee •Liability for fraud •Liability for negligence Liability for fraud Langridge v Levy, 1837 Liability for negligence 1)Things dangerous per se Dixon v Bell, 1816 Beckett v Newalls Insulation Co, 1953 2)things not dangerous per se but known to be so by the transferor Farrent Barnes, 1862 Holmes v Ashford, 1950 3)Things neither dangerous per se nor known to be dangerous to the transferor but dangerous in fact Donogue v Stevenson Consumer protection legislation in England Unfair contract Terms Act, 1977 Consumer Safety Act, 1978