Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Should India Be Divided Larger States For Better Governence: .Saravanan .Bala .Hari

    Uploaded by

    harihararajan
    The document discusses the division of larger Indian states into smaller states for better governance. It argues that dividing large populous states could promote more effective administration and development. Smaller states may be able to implement policies more easily and ensure all areas are properly represented. Politicians would have less workload and area to manage, allowing for better governance. Some states that emerged from divisions like Haryana and Chhattisgarh have seen high economic growth and development, demonstrating the potential benefits of smaller states. However, the document also notes the need to avoid separating states in a way that divides people. Overall, it argues that dividing overpopulated states could help accelerate India's development by enabling more focused governance at the state level.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Should India Be Divided Larger States For Better Governence: .Saravanan .Bala .Hari

    Uploaded by

    harihararajan
    15 views40 pages
    The document discusses the division of larger Indian states into smaller states for better governance. It argues that dividing large populous states could promote more effective administration and development. Smaller states may be able to implement policies more easily and ensure all areas are properly represented. Politicians would have less workload and area to manage, allowing for better governance. Some states that emerged from divisions like Haryana and Chhattisgarh have seen high economic growth and development, demonstrating the potential benefits of smaller states. However, the document also notes the need to avoid separating states in a way that divides people. Overall, it argues that dividing overpopulated states could help accelerate India's development by enabling more focused governance at the state level.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    nep final

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses the division of larger Indian states into smaller states for better governance. It argues that dividing large populous states could promote more effective administration and development. Smaller states may be able to implement policies more easily and ensure all areas are properly represented. Politicians would have less workload and area to manage, allowing for better governance. Some states that emerged from divisions like Haryana and Chhattisgarh have seen high economic growth and development, demonstrating the potential benefits of smaller states. However, the document also notes the need to avoid separating states in a way that divides people. Overall, it argues that dividing overpopulated states could help accelerate India's development by enabling more focused governance at the state level.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    15 views40 pages

    Should India Be Divided Larger States For Better Governence: .Saravanan .Bala .Hari

    Uploaded by

    harihararajan
    The document discusses the division of larger Indian states into smaller states for better governance. It argues that dividing large populous states could promote more effective administration and development. Smaller states may be able to implement policies more easily and ensure all areas are properly represented. Politicians would have less workload and area to manage, allowing for better governance. Some states that emerged from divisions like Haryana and Chhattisgarh have seen high economic growth and development, demonstrating the potential benefits of smaller states. However, the document also notes the need to avoid separating states in a way that divides people. Overall, it argues that dividing overpopulated states could help accelerate India's development by enabling more focused governance at the state level.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 40

    SHOULD INDIA BE DIVIDED LARGER

    STATES FOR BETTER GOVERNENCE

    S.SARAVANAN
    S.BALA
    S.HARI
    YES OF COURSE
    Small states

    A reality of India
    in 1950

    • The constitution of India distinguished 3 types


    of states.

    • Part A, B, and C states.


    1956 - 1961

    • State reorganization act ,1956.

    • 14 states, 4 union territories


    1963 – 1975

    • Haryana
    • Himachal Pradesh
    • Meghalaya
    • Manipur
    • Tripura
    • Sikkim
    1975 - 2000

    • Mizoram

    • Arunachal Pradesh
    2000

    • Chhattisgarh
    • Uttarakhand

    • Jharkhand
    The need for the hour is having a

    SMALL STATE
    FACTS ABOUT OUR INDIAN STATES

    Uttar Pradesh
    • Population of more than 167 billion
    • Bigger than Germany + France, Russia, Pakistan,
    China, America, Brazil and Indonesia.
    TAMILNADU

    • Population of more than 62.2 million

    • Bigger than Britain and Italy


    ANDHRA PRADESH
    • Population of more than 76.4 million
    • Bigger than Germany and Vietnam.

    Bihar
    • Population of more than 82 million.
    • Bigger than Mexico
    Maharashtra
    • Population of more than 92.1 million.
    • Maharashtra has ten million more than
    Germany.

    West Bengal
    • Population of more than 80 million.
    • Bigger than the Philippines
    If the big states means progress then
    why India has not made progress like
    America, Germany, France ,Hong Kong or England.
    America, Hong Kong both were ruled by

    England just like India.


    Do small states suffer?

    Not if one views Chhattisgarh ,


    Haryana and Himachal Pradesh
    Highly dynamic states

    • Uttarakhand has averaged 9.31% growth

    • Jharkhand has averaged 8.45% growth


    • Chhattisgarh has averaged 7.35% growth annually.
    Why these states are divided?
    • India will move towards the true definition of a
    republic.
    Shall we get separated by breaking
    of any states
    BENEFITS IN DIVIDING

    STATES
    • India can be developed faster because each and every
    state government is responsible for the development of
    the state.
    •  The benefits of the government polices can be
    implemented very easily.
    • With smaller area of states, administration will definitely
    be better and each area will be properly represented.
    • Controlling power will be more powerful

    • Politicians will have less area under them so they have


    less work load therefore better governing.
    MOST SUCCESSFUL STATES
    HARYANA
    • Carved out of Punjab in 1966.

    ECONOMIC
    • PER CAPITA INCOME: Rs 49,038 in 2008 (third highest in the
    country)
    • INDUSTRIES: One of the most industrialised states in India,
    Haryana is home to Maruti, Hero Honda and other big
    industries ranging from cars to IT.
    Its agricultural output is also increased.

    Source: India today


    SOCIAL
    • LITERACY: 67.91 per cent
    • Punjab government did not pay adequate attention to it.
    • After the reorganisation, Haryana has become one of the
    most industrialised states of India.
    • The state's agricultural development has led to a higher per
    capital income - the third highest in the country at Rs 49,038
    in 2008
    • Haryana has also become a hub of maximum foreign direct
    investment .

    Source: India today


    CHHATTISGARH
    12
    Growth rate for Real GSDP
    10.3
    10 9.6
    8.5
    8 7.4
    6.6
    5.9 5.9 5.9 6.2 5.7
    (%)

    6 5.0 5.0
    4.5 4.4 4.6 4.7
    3.9
    4 3.2 3.0
    2.1 2.1
    2

    0
    Jharkhand Bihar Chhattisgarh Madhya Uttarakhand Uttar Pradesh India
    Pradesh
    Source: Central Statistical Organization;Note 1986-87 to 1992-93
    1993-94 to 1999-00
    2000-01 to 2006-07
    Demand for separate States

    • The first attempt was done by GJM to declare the


    Darjeeling area as "Gorkhaland" with Capital Siliguri.
    • For this, 21 young activists of Gorkha Janamukti
    Morcha(GJM) started indefinite fasting and processions
    in the district of Darjeeling.
    • This movement of separation was followed by Uttar Pradesh
    where voices raised for declaration of 3 different states
    namely Poorvanchal, Harit Pradesh demanded by RLD and
    Bundelkhand demanded by BMM.
    • The demand for separate Vidarbh from Maharashtra has
    been from long.
    • There have been voices for the demand of Saurashtra as a
    separate state in Gujarat.
    FUTURE INDIA
    • small states are the key of success for central
    government
    • Shall we get separated by breaking of many
    states
    • Why do you think this as division?
    • This is not division but only splitting into
    smaller states
    • Central Government is the only hope for
    development and success of any country
    • Need the people who regulate there law and
    order properly
    INDIA CAN SURVIVE AND
    PROSPER BY BREAKING UP.

    You might also like