Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Union Pacific Corporation APRIL 18, 2013: Dan Ballantine & Keaton J. Cervantes
Union Pacific Corporation APRIL 18, 2013: Dan Ballantine & Keaton J. Cervantes
Source: keystone-xl.com
Macroeconomic Outlook
Keystone XL Pipeline
Permit was denied based
on possible environment
consequences
Recent pipeline failure in
Arkansas has reignited
fears of environmental
impact of pipeline
Approval is uncertain at the
moment
Strengths Weaknesses
- Excess cash reserves can - Largely unionized workforce
allow UNP to upgrade fleet may lead to work stoppages
- Rail lines provide access to - Aging locomotive fleet
shale oil reserves
- Strong operational efficiency
Opportunities Threats
- Continued growth in oil - Keystone XL approval
shipments
- Upgrade fleet to be more - Economic downturn
fuel efficient
- Increased trade between US - Continual decline in coal
and Mexico shipments
Strategy
Invest in network of rail and locomotives by
replacing existing equipment, in addition to
compliance with Positive Train Control (PTC)
Increase the use of fuel surcharges to reduce
vulnerability to rising fuel costs
More efficient locomotives
Increased shareholder returns through additional
dividend raises and share repurchases
Operating Ratio
Metric Value
Current Stock
Price $136.94
Trailing P/E
16.56
Forward P/E
14.58
Dividend
2.02%
Yield
Market Cap
($ millions) $64,142.7
Profitability Ratios
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Operating Profit Margin 22.68% 23.98% 29.36% 29.27% 32.23%
Net Margin 13.01% 13.42% 16.39% 16.83% 18.84%
ROA 6.01% 4.62% 6.50% 7.47% 8.55%
ROE (Book Value) 15.07% 11.72% 16.02% 18.12% 20.51%
Solvency Ratios
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Debt/Assets 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19
Debt/Equity 0.58 0.58 0.52 0.48 0.45
Interest Coverage 7.97 5.65 8.27 10.01 12.61
Financial Analysis
Activity Ratios
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
A/R Turnover 29.31 22.45 18.34 15.13 15.32
Days Sales Outstanding 12.45 16.26 19.90 24.12 23.83
Fixed Asset Turnover 0.51 0.39 0.45 0.50 0.51
Total Asset Turnover 0.46 0.34 0.40 0.44 0.45
DuPont Analysis
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tax Burden 65.60% 67.98% 63.48% 63.90% 63.49%
Interest Burden 87.46% 82.31% 87.91% 90.01% 92.07%
Operating Profit Margin 22.68% 23.98% 29.36% 29.27% 32.23%
Asset Turnover 45.24% 33.35% 39.37% 43.37% 44.38%
Leverage 2.57 2.50 2.43 2.43 2.37
ROE 15.14% 11.20% 15.65% 17.72% 19.84%
Comparable Companies
Comparable Companies
Canadian National Railway Company CNR (TSX) 3.90x 4.61x 9.90x 16.22
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited CP (TSX) 4.40x 4.25x 11.40x 20.35
CSX Corp. CSX (NYSE) 2.80x 2.81x 7.30x 13.69
Kansas City Southern KSU (NYSE) 3.90x 5.60x 13.90x 26.10
Norfolk Southern Corp. NSC (NYSE) 2.50x 2.85x 7.80x 13.82
Comparable Statistics
High 4.40x 5.60x 13.90x 26.10
Median 3.90x 4.25x 9.90x 16.22
Low 2.50x 2.81x 7.30x 13.69
Mean 3.50x 4.02x 10.06x 18.04
Source: Capital IQ
Comparable Company Analysis
Implied UNP
Multiple Weight Stock Price
Price/Book Value 30% $ 145.15
Forward TEV/Sales 30% $ 167.99
Forward TEV/EBITDA 15% $ 177.46
Forward P/E 25% $ 169.41
UNP Implied Stock Price $ 162.91
Source: Capital IQ
Discount Rate
Annual Realized Returns
CAPM Year Actual
1 33.55%
2 13.93%
Risk-Free Rate 3.12% 3 29.44%
Market Risk Premium 6.00% 4 66.00%
5 -27.50%
5-Year Beta 0.74
Total Realized Return 137.03%
Debt 8,997.00
WACC 11.05%
DCF Analysis
Union Pacific Corporation Discounted Cash Flow Analysis ($ millions)