The document discusses population health management and related concepts. It begins with an overview of the topics that will be covered, including the relationship between aging and population health management, definitions of population health, the "triple aim" movement in the US, and challenges in implementing the "triple aim." It then provides summaries and references for several key papers on population health and the "triple aim."
The document discusses population health management and related concepts. It begins with an overview of the topics that will be covered, including the relationship between aging and population health management, definitions of population health, the "triple aim" movement in the US, and challenges in implementing the "triple aim." It then provides summaries and references for several key papers on population health and the "triple aim."
The document discusses population health management and related concepts. It begins with an overview of the topics that will be covered, including the relationship between aging and population health management, definitions of population health, the "triple aim" movement in the US, and challenges in implementing the "triple aim." It then provides summaries and references for several key papers on population health and the "triple aim."
1) Why are ageing and population health management so closely related in the policy debate? 2) Conflicting definitions of population health (management) 3) Population health management and the «triple aim» movement in the US 4) How to avoid the «triple fail» situations 5) Implementation problems of the «triple aim» in the US Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini Population health – References used
1) Kinding «What are we talking about when we
talk about Population health», Health Affairs 2015 2) Berwick et al. «The triple aim», Health Affairs, 2008 3) Lewis et al. «How health systems could avert triple fail events», Health Affairs, 2013 4) Whittington et al. «Pursuing the triple aim: 7 years later», Milbank Quarterly, 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ageing and Population Health Mgmt - The problems of sustainability are not due to ageing alone, but to a lack of coherence in using different policy tools (funding, organization, regulation of professions, governance of R&D) - Political and professional problems in defining essential and appropriate care (fight against «waste») - Acute care absorbs excessive resources with little gains in terms of quality-adjusted life expectancy - Inappropriate incentives and lack of organization models in primary care to deal with chronic illnesses (need for a pop health mgmt Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini Chronic Care and Population Health Mgmt - Chronic patients require tailored models of care and new expertise (research and education) to cope with their specific needs (e.g. poly- pharmacy) - The financing and the organization of services should rely more on vertically integrated models linking primary, intermediate and secondary care - More emphasis is required on prevention (primary and secondary) with more reliance on self-care - Need to avoid excessive medicalization (eg, is Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini Reforms and Population Health Mgmt To implement this re-organisation some «new» ideas have been collected and labelled «Pop Health Mgmt»: - central role of patients (education, self-care); - performance targets in terms of health outcomes (not volumes) to design part of the payments; - payment mechanisms based more on capitation (not fee for services or activity based); - specific incentives for primary care organizations and for vertical integration; - budgetary solutions to integrate health and social care for a given area (mostly for public Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini Population Health - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health and Triple Aim - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health - Kinding 2015
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Population Health - Kinding 2015 Additional references on the concept of Population Health Management: - Kinding and Stoddard, American Journal of Public Health, March 2003, Vol 93, No. 3 - Kings’ Fund, What does improving population health really mean?, 2017 - Sharfstein, The Strange Journey of Population Health, The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 92, No. 4, 2014 (pp. 640-643)
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Triple Aim – Institute for Healthcare improv 2008
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Triple Aim - IHI 2008 – Motivations
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Triple Aim - IHI 2008 – Slow improvements
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
Triple Aim - IHI 2008 – Broader system of goals
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
IHI 2008 – A tragedy of the commons
Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini
McDonough Medicare for all – Millb Quart 2019 George Santayana’s famous quote—“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”—comes to mind when considering prospects for a “Medicare for All” or single-payer health system revolution. There is history here demanding attention that goes beyond President Harry Truman’s ill-fated effort in the late 1940s. Since 1994, four states have taken a cold, hard, and serious look at single payer and backed off, three via voter ballot initiatives and one by legislation. Collectively, they offer a compelling “starter’s package” of case studies on Medicare for All. Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini McDonough Medicare for all – California 1994 Voters rejected Proposition 186 — the California Health Security Act—by 73% to 27%. The California initiative would have been financed by new taxes on employers, individuals, and tobacco products. Kaiser Family Foundation concluded that the defeat was “largely the result of voters’ attitudes against ‘big government’ and higher taxes Leading opponents included insurance companies, business organizations, and hospitals who outspent proponents by $9 million to $2.7 million. Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini McDonough Medicare for all – Oregon 2002 Voters rejected Measure 23 — the Healthcare Finance Plan Amendment — by 78.5% to 21.5% The constitutional amendment would have been funded by progressive income taxes on individuals of up to 8% and by payroll taxes on employers from 3% to 11.5%. Opponents included insurers, businesses, the state AFL-CIO, hospitals, and nurses, who outspent proponents by an estimated $1.2 million to $95,000 — most of the latter being spent on signature gathering. Health services research – Gianluca Fiorentini McDonough Medicare for all – Colorado 2016 Voters rejected Amendment 26 — Colorado Care — by 78.8% to 21.3%. The system was to have been funded by a new 10% payroll tax split between employers and workers and by a new 10% tax on all nonpayroll income. Supporters were out-funded by opponents $4.1 million to $917,715. Most opposition funding came from the health care industry, including $1 million from the insurance giant Anthem.