The document discusses value and waste in research based on a 2014 Lancet series. It summarizes the series' findings that much biomedical research is wasted due to biased priorities, lack of use of previous literature, replicability problems, and publication bias against negative results. It also notes issues like the lack of interdisciplinary research and how funding and career incentives can introduce bias. The series and other works call for reforms to increase value and reduce waste in research design, conduct, analysis, and priority setting.
The document discusses value and waste in research based on a 2014 Lancet series. It summarizes the series' findings that much biomedical research is wasted due to biased priorities, lack of use of previous literature, replicability problems, and publication bias against negative results. It also notes issues like the lack of interdisciplinary research and how funding and career incentives can introduce bias. The series and other works call for reforms to increase value and reduce waste in research design, conduct, analysis, and priority setting.
The document discusses value and waste in research based on a 2014 Lancet series. It summarizes the series' findings that much biomedical research is wasted due to biased priorities, lack of use of previous literature, replicability problems, and publication bias against negative results. It also notes issues like the lack of interdisciplinary research and how funding and career incentives can introduce bias. The series and other works call for reforms to increase value and reduce waste in research design, conduct, analysis, and priority setting.
- Different types of scientific research (basic, translational and organizational) - Biased research priorities (clinicians, patients, payers) - Lack of use of previous literature - The replicability problem (transparency regulations and use of registered protocols) - The publication bias against negative results - Lack of interdisciplinary research - Funding and the careers of researchers (bias) - Mapping the research portfolio Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini References 1
- Chalmers, Bracken, Djulbegovic, Garattini,
Grant, Gülmezoglu, Howells, Ioannidis, Oliver, “How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set”, Lancet 2014 - Ioannidis, Greenland, Hlatky, Khoury, Macleod, Moher, Schulz, Tibshirani, “Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis”, Lancet 2014 - Ioannidis, “Why Most Clinical research is not useful”, PLoS Med 2016
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
References 2
- Ioannidis, “Defending biomedical science in an
era of threatened funding”, JAMA 2017
- Ivanov, Kaczkowska, Khan, Ho, Tavakol ,
Prasad, et al. ”Review and analysis of publication trends over three decades in three high impact medicine journals” PLoS ONE, 2017
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Lancet 2014: Value and waste in research - Funding for health research is high, but not increasing, at least not in the US - Several scholars and other stakeholders believe that a large part (60-70%) of biomedical research funds are wasted due to the choice of irrelevant topics, low methodological quality and lack of replicability - The most influential criticism of how (publicly financed) health research is organized is the Lancet 2014 series on «Value and Waste» in research - The series includes 5 highly quoted papers and Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini Moses et al. JAMA 2015 – Funding USA
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Value and waste in research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Value and waste in research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Different types of research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Basic research is relevant?
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: funding for types of research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Poor value of basic research?
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: translational research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: funding for different type of research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: priorities and burden of diseases
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: needs-led (bed to bench) research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Potential users’ needs are ignored
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: lack of reference to previous literature
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: originality and previous literature
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: the previous literature
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Priority setting in research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: No systematic review
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: No systematic review
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: the replicability problem
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: funding replications
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: positive results bias
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: interdiscipl. & clinical reserch
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: mapping the research portfolio
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: mapping the research portfolio
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: mapping the research portfolio
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: James Lind Alliance
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Value and waste in research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Chalmers: Value and waste in research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannides et al 2014: Value and waste in research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis et al 2014: conflicts of interest
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis et al 2014: conflicts of interest
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis 2014: Protocols for systematic reviews
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis et al 2014: Recommendations
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis et al 2014: Recommendations
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis JAMA 2015: Reform is needed
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis 2015: Fighting fruitless research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis 2015: Negative selection for researchers
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannidis: Funds for «implementation» research
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ioannides: Funding and careers
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Clinical studies - Ivanov et al. Plos One 2017
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ivanov et al. Plos One 2017 – Clinical studies
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ivanov et al. Plos One 2017 – Clinical studies
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini
Ivanov et al. Plos One 2017 – Clinical studies
Health services research – Unibo – Gianluca Fiorentini