Defamation is when someone making a documentary involves criticism or any damaging allegation of an individual or an organization. If an individual or organization does file a lawsuit because of defamation, any person who is responsible can be sued, for example; program makers and / or broadcasters.
Defamation is when someone making a documentary involves criticism or any damaging allegation of an individual or an organization. If an individual or organization does file a lawsuit because of defamation, any person who is responsible can be sued, for example; program makers and / or broadcasters.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Defamation is when someone making a documentary involves criticism or any damaging allegation of an individual or an organization. If an individual or organization does file a lawsuit because of defamation, any person who is responsible can be sued, for example; program makers and / or broadcasters.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Media Law governing Factual Programming
Media Law How it imposes How it could affect How it could affect
constraints on media your product your product positively
production? negatively
Defamation Defamation's when someone _ | This canaffect my product This can affect my product
making a documentary involves
crcism or any damaging
allegation ofan individual or an
organization. If makers involve
this sort of fact into their
product, they are advised to
seek legal advice froma legal
representative. This can impact
on any program as any
individual or organization can
sue if being a victim of
defamation. if an individual or
organization does fie a lawsuit
because of defamation, any
person who is responsible can
be sued, for example; program
makers andlor broadcasters.
However, ifa defamatory
allegation is made the person or
organization is given a chance
to tespond and prove that they
are not inthe wrong as its
necessary fora response to be
sought by the subject of the
allegations are made against
negatively because if | were to
‘bad mouth’ someone who is
very much involved in the dance
art industry, for example; a
popular or famous
choreographer ora well known
dancer or evena reputable
dance institution, without any
background information and any
evidence to suppor the
allegation(s). As a result this
action would affect my
documentary i the person was
to sue the production company.
posttvely because now that |
have understood that this
statement can resulls to
‘complicated consequences
obtained against the person
responsible, so now that | have
realized this, | now know that |
should be careful when
producing my documentary.
Especially when creating the
script, should be careful that |
shouldn't use any sort of,
negative language or behavior
when referencing anyone
involved in the documentary.Contempt of Court
Ifa program contains or makes:
any reference to an active or
‘current egal accounts, mainly
criminal proceedings and
anything that involves children,
itis advised that the program
maker must seek legal advice
instantly. Ifthe program maker
does not seek for legal advice,
doesn't consider the
‘consequences and carries on to
reference to an active or current
legal accounts, criminal
proceedings orchidren
involvement, they would have to
face hefty penalties, which may
include an unlimited fine or up
to two years imprisonment to
the person who & responsible
{or this offending publication or
broadcasting which would
‘normally be the editor. ther
financial penalties may be
‘enforced in certain
circumstances.
This can affect my product
negatively if! were involve any
referencing of legal proceedings
for accounts. This can have a
big impact on my documentary
iffor example | was to flm a
segmentwhere a person
involved in the dance art
industry, na cour or seeking
legal advise, this would results
a the production company or
myself to face and bare
sanctions such as, financial
Penalties or up to two years of
imprisonment.
This can affeat my product
positively, forthe reason that
‘now that | have understood to
what can happen if were to
se some sort of referencing or
legal accounts or proceedings, |
can be cautious about what the
include in my documentary and
what not to. However, because
‘my documentary topicissue has
got nothing to do with legal
'ssues, | wouldn't have a
chance to include any sort of
contempt of cour.
Privacy and
Confidence
If your program contains private
‘and confidential information
vithout the permission ofthe
person or organization it relates,
to, itis again advised to seek
legal help from the program
lawyer. Its said that the law of
‘confidence isthe easiest way
for an individual and
‘organization to use this offence
to stop any program from being
broadcasted by gaining a ‘pre-
transmission injunction’ If this
This can affect my product
negatively because, i | were to
show for example, a private
conversation (interview)
between a professional dancer
and myself and then broadcast
itwithout any consent or
permission, the person who was
being flmed can obtain a
injunetion to stop the
broadcasting of my
documentary or the private
‘conversation. This canhave a
huge impact on my
This can affeat my product
posively because now that |
have acknowledged what the
consequences can be obiained
against the person involved in
this action, !can now be careful
when interviewing experts and
other people, as I now know
that Ihave to receive some sort
of consent or permission before
' broadcast or publish my
documentary to the public.Privacy and Injunction is granted, the ‘documentary as itcan modify
individual or organization can | the issue of my documentary,
Confidence ‘stop all other media without that segment.
(Continued) ‘organizations who are aware of | Addiionally, f were to break
the siuation. Breaking an that injunction process, it would
injunction is a commit a mean that | would be
contempt (criminal offence). | commiting a criminal offence.
Copyright “Allmaterals suchas; music or Ths can affect my product This can affect my product
archive footage, must be negatively because, if were to | positively because now that |
‘eared for use within programs | use any material lke copyrights | have comprehended that there
‘and this isthe producers, or trademarks without any could be substantial fines fled
responsibilty. Program makers | consertipermission or legal __| against me, | have to make
make a important responsibilty | advice froma legal certain that before I use or
to make sure that all representative (program lawyer) | publsh copyrights or
clearances, ie. copyrights, {rom the copyright owner, | trademarks, they have to be
trademarks, ete. have been | would probably have to face | cleared to use within programs,
achieved for their programor | some sort of hefyfitancial fine. | and also would have to make
‘show. Whenit's appropriate, | If I was to now receive without | sure that | receive a form of a
Program makers must gaina | any consent/permission or egal | cense agreement from the
consent of the copyright owner, | advice froma legal copyfight owner, that | have
Usually in the form ofa signed | representative (program awyer) | permission to use any
license agreement. iffor ary | fromthe copyright owner, in| copyrights or trademarks.
reason the consents refused or | which this would be seen as a
ifthere is a problemwith the | criminal offence.
‘clearing, the material must be
removed before broadcasting,
‘or otherwise the program maker
must alert and seek legal advice
froma program lawyer, who can
decide whether or not the
materal can be used without
making ita criminal offence.