Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter#6 More On Verbs Auxiliary VPS: Presented By: Presented To
Chapter#6 More On Verbs Auxiliary VPS: Presented By: Presented To
Chapter#6 More On Verbs Auxiliary VPS: Presented By: Presented To
• This change of form in the finite verb (tensed) according to the number and person of the
subject NP is called subject–verb agreement.
• English verbs display obvious subject–verb agreement only in the present tense and then only
with a third-person singular subject.
• English has just two tenses; Present and Past. You may be wondering about the future. Future
time is expressible in a variety of ways. For example, by means of the auxiliary (modal) verb
‘will’, as in ‘He will go’ but there is no future tense as such.
• It’s important to recognise that there is no simple correlation between the grammatical category
tense and the notion of time. For example, in the right circumstances, both present tense and
past tense are compatible with the expression of future time, as shown below;
• The boat leaves at ten tonight. (Present tense – future time)
• If he gave me the bleach tomorrow, I’d use it. (Past tense – future time)
• Furthermore, ‘will’ is capable of expressing ideas other than
future time.
• ‘He will keep pestering me!’
• Here ‘will’ is used for expressing the way of saying that he is
always doing it.
THE CONTRAST BETWEEN LEXICAL
AND AUXILIARY VERBS
• The two most important differences between lexical and auxiliary verbs are:
• In questions, auxiliary verbs can move in front of the subject NP. A lexical verb cannot.
• The negative particle (not or n’t) can attach to an auxiliary verb but never to a lexical verb.
• To make these differences evident let us compare the auxiliary verbs ‘can’ with the lexical
verbs ‘speak’.
• He can go. Vs. He spoke.
• Can he go? Vs. *Spoke he?
• He cannot/can’t go. Vs. He spoke not (*spoken’t).
The verb ‘need’
• The verb ‘need’ is listed among the modal auxiliary verbs. In fact, there
are two verbs ‘need’. One an auxiliary, the other lexical with a subtle
difference in meaning:
• lexical; He doesn’t need to go a drink.
• While as an auxiliary; He needn’t go.
• As indicated, the lexical verb can take a direct object NP – a drink – so it’s
transitive.
infinitive particle
• The point is, following the lexical verb ‘need’ but not auxiliary ‘need’, the
following verb is introduced by to. This is the infinitive particle.
• When a verb follows a lexical verb, it can be introduced by the infinitive
particle ‘to’
• But not when it follows an auxiliary verb.
• For example, ‘hope’ and ‘forget’ are lexical verbs and when they are followed
by another verb, that other verb is lexical and is introduced by to: He hopes to
pass but he forgot to study.
Modal Auxiliary Verb
• Modal auxiliary verbs are used to show a necessity, capability, willingness,
or possibility. Unlike most verbs, there is only one form of these verbs.
• modal verbs are always tensed (finite). They do not have un-tensed (non-
finite) forms
Present modal verbs: can, will shall may
• must and need don’t even have a past tense form but just the one (present
tense) form already given.
• in contrast to auxiliary need, lexical need does have a past tense form. He
needed to go (preceding the infinitive particle to) and He needed a drink
(taking an NP complement) are fine
• that they never show subject-verb agreement
• They don’t change their form in the present tense, not even with a third
person singular subject NP. There is not any addition of‘s’ or ‘es’ with
the third person singular
• Example:
• She can go not she cans go.
• Ali can go not Ali cans go.
Perfect Auxiliary Verbs
• “Be” also figures twice. In below example “is” is the present tense
form of progressive be, and being is the progressive participle of
the copula.
For example:
“Nanny is being a nuisance again”
• Following are the example of three kinds of auxiliary
• For example:
• “You may be wondering about the future. (MOD + PROG)”
• “Millie has been using the bleach. (PERF + PROG)”
• “Bill might have been teasing you. (MOD + PERF + PROG)”
• The ordering of the verbs is absolutely fixed.
“MOD before PERF before PROG before Lexical V”
Passive Auxiliary be
• All the above examples discussed so far are said to be in the
active voice.
• Sentences that include the passive auxiliary verb “be” are said
to be in the passive voice.
For example:
“The pool is/was filled”
“Nothing is/was written”
• The choice of passive “be” affects the form of the sentence as a whole if the above
sentences are compared it with following example:
“Daisy is/was filling the pool”
“Max is/was writing nothing”
“Passive be, a verb adopts the passive participle form (e.g. stolen)”
• PASS “be” can co-occur with any combination of other auxiliaries:
For example:
“Your water pistol will be confiscated. (MOD + PASS)”
“The pool has been filled by Daisy. (PERF + PASS)”
“Otto is being driven mad by all the noise. (PROG + PASS)”
“It should have been written by now. (MOD + PERF + PASS)”
“It may be being written right now. (MOD + PROG + PASS)”
“It could have been being written. (MOD + PERF + PROG + PASS)”
• The ordering of the verbs is absolutely fixed.
“MOD before PERF before PROG before PASS before Lexical V”
Where auxiliary fit in the VP
structure
Auxiliary VPs and Adverbials
Where auxiliary fit in the VP structure
• An auxiliary verb is a verb that adds functional or grammatical meaning to the clause in which it
appears,.
• Auxiliary verbs usually accompany a main verb and the main verb provides the main semantic
content of the clause.
• Auxiliary verbs are also called helping verbs. Auxiliary verbs always go before the main verb
while in the questions the auxiliary verbs come before the subject whereas the main verb comes
after the subject.
• Examples: In the following examples, I’ve bracketed the VP
[1] Peter will VP [study the menu]
[2] Peter has VP[studied the menu].
[3] Peter is VP [studying the menu].
• What [1], [3] show is that auxiliary verbs are necessarily followed by VPs. In fact, auxiliaries are
verbs that take VP complements they demand a following VP.
I thought sister of VP and daughter of VP was for adverbials. Well, sister of VP and daughter of VP is
indeed the sign of a constituent functioning as an adverbial but not if that constituent is an auxiliary
verb (i.e. MOD, PERF, and PROG).
• So, each auxiliary verb is the head of its VP and takes a VP complement.
This applies when we have more than one auxiliary.
Auxiliary VPs and Adverbials
• In linguistics, verb phrase is a syntactic unit composed of at least one verb and its
dependents, objects, components and other modifiers but not always including the
subject.
• Verb phrases are generally divided into two types: finite verbs and nonfinite verbs.
Phrase structure grammars acknowledges both types.
• Auxiliary VP is the verb that has both the main verb and helping verb. On the other
side, adverbials are words that we use to give more information about a verb. They
can be one word (angrily, here) or phrases (in a few hours etc.) and often say how,
where, when or how often something happens or is done.
• A favored position for adverbials is the position following the first
auxiliary, as in [That hippo could easily have killed me!].
• In [Bill might just have been teasing you], the adverbial precedes the
lexical verb, following two auxiliaries. If an adverbial precedes a verb,
assume it modifies the following VP.
Construction that
Depends on Auxiliaries
Passive Sentences
Negative Sentences
and Auxiliary do
Passive Sentences and Active
Sentences
?
We can do
by means of Can be indicated
a by the brackets
prepositional
( )
phrase
PP
It functions as
adverbial
phrase
It modifies
lexical VP
Rule II
• Converting an active sentence into its passive
counterpart involves shifting the OBJECT into
subject position, it follows that only lexical verbs
that TAKE OBJECTS (direct or indirect) can
figure in passive sentence
Continue…..
Examples