Computational Design of Hysteresis Free Perovskite Solar Cell

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Computational design of Hysteresis free

Perovskite Solar Cell

Usama B. Qasim and Nauman Z. Butt


Degraded Perovskite solar cell
• Non Idealities change the inclination of the slope
• Due to the accumulation of opposite carrier at
the interface on both sides of the cell
• Degraded Perovskite solar cell split in three
layers

Suppose charge accumulate at the one side..!


Degraded Perovskite solar cell
• Non Idealities change the inclination
of the slope
• Due to the accumulation of opposite
carrier at the interface on both sides of
the cell
• Degraded Perovskite solar cell split in
three layers
Band Diagram Comparison
• Three layer architecture is more
practically form due to the
migration at the interface.
• Ions at the interface is represented
in top an bottom thin layers.
• S shape hysteresis is formed if traps
are ionized hence decreases FF.
Traps in Perovskite solar cell
•   Grain size improve the SRH time
• SRH time increases the
• Less Traps Less Hysteresis
Shallow Traps
•   Grain size improve the SRH time
• SRH time increases the
• Less Traps Less Hysteresis
Conclusion
• Validate
  Hysteresis based device is three layer device
• in bulk, enhances the FF (~62%) reduces S shape IV.
• Shallow traps () with ions interface
causes S shape IV.
• charged traps and ions are similar but not identical
• If ions immigration is hinder to keeping
causes efficient change in the performance.
Computational Study of Stack/Terminal
Topologies for Perovskite Based Bifacial
Tandem Solar Cells

Usama B. Qasim, Hassan Imran, Muhammad Kamran () , Dr. Muhammad Faryad


(Physics) and Dr. Nauman Z. Butt (Electrical Engineering)
Stack Configurations in Tandem Solar Cells

• Monolithic Configuration 2T
• Mechanical Stack Configuration 4T
• Hybrid Configuration 3T

• Research Contains
• Electrical Simulations
• Optical Simulations
Current Matching in 2T
• The 2T has the current limiting factor
• In 4T best Top and Bottom cells are used
• In 3T the albedo reflection is 2/3 of the
reflected light

• 2T Top cell thickness dependent


• 4T High manufacturing cost less
independent of thickness
Efficiency and Bifacial Gain
• The Figure on the right hand side shows the BG by varying Reflection
• The Figure on the left hand side shows the Efficiency by varying Reflection

You might also like