Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EOQ Assumptions: EPL Model Relaxes This One
EOQ Assumptions: EPL Model Relaxes This One
1
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Modeling Philosophies for Handling Uncertainty
2
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
The Newsvendor Approach
Assumptions:
1. single period
2. random demand with known distribution
3. linear overage/shortage costs
4. minimum expected cost criterion
Examples:
• newspapers or other items with rapid obsolescence
• Christmas trees or other seasonal items
• capacity for short-life products
3
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Newsvendor Model Notation
X demand (in units), a random variable.
d
g ( x) G ( x) density function of demand.
dx
co cost (in dollars) per unit left over after demand is realized.
4
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Newsvendor Model
Cost Function:
co max Q x,0 g ( x)dx c s max x Q,0 g ( x)dx
0 0
Q
co 0
(Q x) g ( x)dx c s ( x Q) g ( x)dx
Q
5
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Newsvendor Model (cont.)
G (Q * ) P X Q * cs
co c s
Critical Ratio is
probability stock
covers demand
Notes:
Q * co
cs
Q * cs co c s
6
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Multiple Period Problems
7
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Example
Scenario:
• GAP orders a particular clothing item every Friday
• mean weekly demand is 100, std dev is 25
• wholesale cost is $10, retail is $25
• holding cost has been set at $0.5 per week (to reflect obsolescence,
damage, etc.)
8
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Example (cont.)
Newsvendor Parameters:
c0 = $0.5
cs = $15
15
Solution: G (Q * ) 0.9677
0.5 15
Q 100
0.9677
25
Q 100 Every Friday, they should
1.85 order-up-to 146, that is, if
25
there are x on hand, then
Q 100 1.85(25) 146
order 146-x.
9
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Newsvendor Takeaways
10
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
The (Q,r) Approach
Assumptions:
1. Continuous review of inventory.
2. Demands occur one at a time.
3. Unfilled demand is backordered.
4. Replenishment lead times are fixed and known.
Decision Variables:
• Reorder Point: r – affects likelihood of stockout (safety stock).
• Order Quantity: Q – affects order frequency (cycle inventory).
11
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Inventory vs Time in (Q,r) Model
Inventory
r
l
Time
12
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Base Stock Model Assumptions
13
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com
Base Stock Notation
Q = 1, order quantity (fixed at one)
r = reorder point
R = r +1, base stock level
l = delivery lead time
14
© Wallace J. Hopp, Mark L. Spearman, 1996, 2000 http://www.factory-physics.com