The Regulating Act of 1773

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

THE REGULATING ACT

1773
MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE ACT:
TO BRING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY
UNDER THE DIRECT CONTROL OF BRITISH
PARLIAMENT AND THE BRITISH CROWN
TO INTRODUCE REFORMS IN THE COMPANY’S
CONSTITUTION AT HOME, i.e., IN LONDON
TO BRING ABOUT REFORMATION IN THE
COMPANY’S GOVERNMENT IN INDIA.
TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE REMEDIES AGAINST
ATROCITIES AND OPPRESSIONS COMMITTED BY
THE COMPANY’S SERVANTS IN INDIA.
PROVISIONS
1.CHANGES IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
COMPANY
 APPOINTMENT AND RETIREMENT OF THE
DIRECTORS.
 VOTING POWER RESTRICTED TO THOSE SHARE
HOLDERS WHO HAD A STOCK OF 1000 POUNDS.
 TENURE OF DIRECTORS 4YEARS
2. REORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY’S
GOVERNMENT OF BENGAL
GOVERNOR GENERAL AND 4 COUNCILLORS.
VACANCY IN THE COUNCIL WAS TO BE FILLED BY
THE COMPANY WITH CONSENT OF BRITISH
CROWN.
PRESIDENCY OF BOMBAY AND MADRAS
SUBORDINATE TO GOV- GEN AND COUNCIL AT
CALCUTTA.
3. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY
THE REGULATING ACT AUTHORIZED THE GOV-
GEN AND COUNCIL TO MAKE RULES AND
REGULATIONS AND ISSUE ORDINANCES FOR THE
GOOD GOVERNMENT OF PRESIDECY OF FORT
WILLIAM AND SUBORDINATE FACTORIES.
THEY WERE TO BE EFFECTIVE ONLY AFTER BEING
REGISTERED WITH SUPREME COURT
4. PROHIBITION AGAINST PRIVATE TRADE
GOV- GEN, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, JUDGES OF
SUPREME COURT WERE PROHIBITED FROM
ACCEPTING PRESENTS.

NO PERSON HOLDING ANY CIVIL OR MILITARY


OFFICE COULD DO PRIVATE TRADE.

PRIVY COUCIL CAN PUNISH MISDEMEANORS


COMMITTED BY IMPORTANT OFFICIALS.
5. ESTABLISHMENT OF SUPREME
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
WITH THIS ENACTMENT UNDER REGULATING
ACT, THE PROVISIONS OF THE EARLIER CHARTER
OF 1753 WERE SUPERSEDED.

CROWN GAVE DIRECTIONS TO ESTABLISH


SUPREME COURT AT FORT WILLIAM.

COURT OF REQUEST WAS CONTINUED.


ACT OF 1774
SUPREME COURT
OF JUDICATURE AT
CALCUTTA
REGULATING ACT EMPOWERED THE CROWN TO
ESTABLISH SUPREME COURT BY ISSUING AN ACT.
1774 ACT WAS PASSED.
IT SUPERSEDED THE PROVISIONS OF CHARTER
OF 1753.
ABOLISHED MAYOR’S COURT
COMPOSITION
SUPREME COURT WAS TO CONSIST OF CHIEF
JUSTICE AND THREE JUDGES.

BARRISTERS OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE YEARS


STANDING.
FUNCTIONS
COURT OF RECORD
COURT OF EQUITY
COULD REGULATE ITS OWN PROCEDURE AND
MAKE RULES FOR THIS PURPOSE.
RULES TO BE APPROVED BY PRIVY COUNCIL.
JURISDICTION
CIVIL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION
ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION
EQUITY JURISDICTION
WRIT JURISDICTION
PROVISION FOR APPEALS
MERITS OF REGULATING ACT 1773
Changes in the constitution of the company
Established strong central government
The control of British parliament over the company
tightened.
The act conferred legislative powers to supreme
council at calcutta.
The judges of supreme court were professional
lawyers.
Prohibition in accepting gifts.
DEMERITS OF REGULATING ACT 1773
No veto power to gov-gen.

You might also like