Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROSPECTUS
PROSPECTUS
• This is done through prospectus which must secure the fullest disclosure
of all material and essential particulars and lay the same in full view of all
intending purchasers of shares.
• Prospectus is a document described or issued as prospectus or
any notice, circular, advertisement or other document inviting offers
from the public for the subscription or purchase of any securities of
a body corporate.
• The prospectus is the basis on which the prospective investors form their
opinion and take decisions as to the worth and prospects of the company.
Misstatements in prospectus and their consequences
Civil liability
Criminal liability
CIVIL LIABILTY
• A person who has been induced to subscribe for shares (or debentures) on the faith of a
misleading prospectus has remedies against the company, and the directors, promoters
and experts.
Remedies against company –
If there is a misstatement or withholding of a material information in a prospectus, and if
it has induced any shareholder to purchase shares he can -
1. Rescind the contract
2. Claim damages from the company whether the statement is fraudulent or an innocent
one – (Damages for deceit) Derry v Peek
• The Statement must be untrue (Rex v Lord Kylsant)–
• A prospectus was issued by a company stating that the company had paid
a dividend every year between 1921 and 1927 (years of depression) and
thus giving the impression of a financially stable company. However the
company had in each of those year incurred considerable trading losses.
This fact was suppressed. It was held that the prospectus was ‘false in
material particular’ in that it conveyed a false impression.
• If a person purchases shares in the open market he has no right against the
company (Peek v Gurney)
• A company issued a prospectus containing false statements. A, relying on
the prospectus applied for and was allotted shares. Later he sold these
shares to P. The company was wound up and P had to pay nearly $100,00
as a contributory. Sought an indemnity for his loss from the directors at
the time of the issue of the prospectus. It was held that directors were not
liable to P.