Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 41

Earthquake Resistant

Design of Structures
IS 13920: Ductile detailing of RC
structures subjected to seismic
forces – code of practice
Performance
criteria
 Moderate Earthquake
– Without structural damage
– Could occur a number of times in the life span
– Code based design seismic coefficients

 Large earthquake
– Without collapse
– May occur once in the life of the structure
– Not catered by the codal design seismic co-efficient
– Additional resistant by incorporating details for
ductility
Zoning Map (under
revision)

 Ductility – to enable the structure to absorb

energy during earthquakes to avoid


sudden collapse

 Details for ductility in IS 13920


High-Strength; High-Stiffness; Brittle

Moderate Strength and Stiffness; Ductile


W/
V
) noit ar elecc

Low-Strength; Low-Stiffness; Brittle

Roof-top Displacement
A(
Need for
ductility
 Earthquake resistant design – costs money
 Cost increases geometrically for no damage
design
 Codes adopts lower coefficient
– reduction factor
 Provisions for durability for once in life
earthquake
 Design criteria is no-collapse design

 IS-13920 – 1993 detailing for ductility


Principles of
ductility

 Avoid shear failure

 Avoid compression failure

 Ensure continuity

 Confine the critical areas where hinge can form.


IS 13920-
1993
 Applicable for structures located in

– Zones IV and V
– Zone III and I > 1
– Zone III and is an industrial structure
– Zone III and more than five stories
Critical zones in R.C.
Frames
Where plastic hinge can form and requires proper
confinement:
 Ends of beams upto length of 2d
– Large negative moments and shears

 Moment reversal is possible

 Ends of columns
– – about 1/6 of the clear height

 Beam column joints


– Reversible local shear
Beam
s

 Width to depth ratio > 0.3

 Width not less than 200mm

 Depth not greater than 0.25 times span

 Minimum number of bars: 2


Detailing of
Beams
 Member size proportions
– Web width  200mm –
• For proper detailing and confinement
– Overall depth D  0.25 of clearspan

 Longitudinal reinforcement
– Minimum longitudinal steel = 0.24
(fck)/fy
• Equals .00259 for M20 and F415
– Maximum long steel on any face, 0.025
Detailing of
Beams

– Minimum compression steel,  0.5 Ast


• Ensures tensile failure
– Minimum two bars (equal to trim) throughout the
length of beam at top and bottom
– Full bond length = Ld + 10 times dia. of bar
– Splice near quarter-span points, only 50%,
• Lap length = Ld
• Confined within stirrups spaced @ 150 mm
Detailing of
Beams

 Transverse reinforcement
– Transverse stirrups designed to ensure shear
capacity exceeds the flexure load capacity
– Spacing of stirrups
• at ends upto 2d  d/4,  8 times dia. of
smallest bar, > 100 mm
• Elsewhere  d/2
Fig.1 Anchorage of Beam
Bars in an External
Joint
Fig.2 Lap, Splice in
Beam
Fig.3 Beam Web
Reinforcement
 Minimum percentage of steel = 0.24  fck / fy

 Maximum Steel Ratio

0.25 times ‘+’ steel at support +0.5 times ‘-’ steel


 Minimum steel ratio 0.25 ‘-‘ steel ratio at joint
 Development length: ld + 10 dia.

 Splicing
Hoops at 100mm c/c
No laps at joints within 2 dia or 1/4th span
Not more than ½ the bars to be
lapped
 Web reinforcement

Bent-up bars cannot take shear


Fig.5 Beam
Reinforcement
Typical Details of
Reinforcement of Main
Beams
Column
s
 Minimum dimension not less than 200mm
 - do - not less than 300mm
for span > 5m or height > 4m

 Footing stirrup shall continue 300mm into

footing
 Special Ductility
Provision
Ash = 0.09 S Dk (fck / fy) [ Ag / Ak – 1 ] for
circular
= 0.18 S h (fck / fy) [ Ag / Ak – 1 ] for
rectangular
Detailing of
Columns

 Member size proportions


– Minimum side dimensions
• b  200 mm and
• b  300 mm if beam span exceed 5m or
unsupported column height exceeds 4 m.
– Preferable ratio of sides, b/d > 0.4, D is
larger side dimension
Detailing of
Columns
 Longitudinal Reinforcement
– Splice not more than 50% at any section
• Within middle half height
– Proper detailing where columns area extends
more than 100 mm beyond confined core.
(Fig. 6 of code)
• If extended portion is non structural provide
minimum long and transverse steel as per IS 456.
Detailing of
Columns
 Transverse Reinforcement
– Transverse tie
• Closed hoops
• Ends bent through 135° with length 10 dia of stirrps as
is crucial to ensure adequate dimension
– Special confinement steel in the end region of column
for a length larger of:
• 450 mm
• 1/6 of clear height
• Longer lateral dimension (D) of the column
Detailing of
Columns
– Specing(s) of special confining reinforcement at end
regions
• S  b/4, b is the smaller dimension
• 100 mm  &  75 mm
– Spacing elsewhere  b/2, b is smaller dimension
– Area of cross section of bar forming special
confining hoop shall be calculated as per clause
• 7.4.7 for spiral
• 7.4.8 for rectangular stirrups
Fig.6 Reinforcement
requirement for Column with
More Than 100 mm
Projection Beyond Core
Fig.7 Transvers
Reinforcement in
Column
Fig.7
A
Fig.8 Calculation of
Design Shear Forces for
Column
Fig.9 Column and Joint
Detailing
Typical Section of
Column
Fig 10 Provision of Special
Confining Reinforcement
in Footing
Shear
Walls

 Minimum thickness 150mm

 Preferably 200 mm with 2 layer steel

 Minimum steel 0.0025 inch in each direction

 Check for shear


Boundary
Elements
 To be designed as columns

Minimum steel 0.8%


Maximum steel 6%
Coupled shear
wall
 Provide diagonal steel
 As = Vu / (1.74 fy sin )

 Openings

 Provide the interrupted beams on


either side
Fig.11 Special Confining
Reinforcement Requirement for
Columns Under Discontinued
Walls
Fig.12 Columns with
Varying
Stiffness
Conclusio
ns

 India has a well developed code

 Problem lies in compliance

 Introduce earthquake engineering in


curriculum

 Update knowledge
THANK YOU

You might also like