Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lakkard Leather Company: Hiwad Abdulgafar Hui Lin Ommair Zahid
Lakkard Leather Company: Hiwad Abdulgafar Hui Lin Ommair Zahid
Hiwad Abdulgafar
Hui Lin
Ommair Zahid
INTRO
· Carl Friedrich Lakkard is the founder.
· Founded in 1966 in Wuppertal, West Germany.
· Gained a reputation for fine leather design and manufacturing.
· In 2003, the company employed 131 people.
Company Background
• Carl F. Lakkard was 24 in 1966, when he resigned for a sales representative job.
• Selling Car accessories, such as leather steering wheel covers and seat cushions.
• In 1998, Kaiser merged with the Eggers Company to form the Lakkard Leather Company.
Accidental Succession
• In 2003, Carl Lakkard and his wife Sandra were involved in a car accident.
• Their son, Peter took over as interim manager.
• Peter lacked the knowledge and skills.
• He discontinued his degree and ran the company.
• He learned quickly and adapted well.
• Peter was gentler which gained him favor with the employees.
CONFLICTS
A. B. C.
The Conflict began when, He was expecting to Carl and Peter clashed
operate his business just
Carl returned after his as he always had. over many business
recovery. decisions.
Key Challenges
6
INDUSTRY GLOBAL
TRENDS TRENDS
Technological Advancements • Animal cruelty
Competition • Rise of synthetic leather
Cost of Manufacturing • Sustainability
Location • Expensive
> >
Location
Specific
• Hard to attract young employees Company
• Cost of labor force Specific
• Tax laws of Germany • Lack of vision and leadership
• No coordination.
• Lack of innovation
• Skeptical of hiring executives
8
FRAMEWORKS CAN BE APPLIED
10
BENEFITS Start
TO EACH
Benefits
OPTIONS
• Change of structure
Fresh ideas, innovation,
younger generation.
11
DRAWBACK
Drawbacks
S TO EACH
• Change of structure
OPTIONS
Different mindset, losing control of the
company
12
Hiwad Abdulgafar
KEY The main point I take away from this case is –
13
Hui Lin
KEY The main points I take away from this case is -
14
Ommair Zahid
KEY The main points I take away from this case is -
15
Questions
16