Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Procedure LAD 5033 WEEK 2
Civil Procedure LAD 5033 WEEK 2
LAD 5033
Dr.Noor Dzuhaidah Osman
Faculty of Syariah and Law, USIM
Insert or Drag & Drop your photo
WEEK 2:
CAUSES OF ACTIONS, COUNTER
Contoso 2
S u i t e s
CAUSES OF
ACTIONS, COUNTER
CLAIMS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit
Contoso 3
S u i t e s
PARTIES
Contoso 4
S u i t e s
• Joinder of causes of action
• Counterclaim against plaintiff
• Counterclaim against additional parties
• Joinder of parties
• Court may order separate trials
Learning
• Misjoinder and non-joinder of parties
• Proceedings against estates
outcomes 1
• Change of parties by reason of death CAUSES OF ACTIONS,
COUNTER CLAIMS AND
• Failure to proceed after death of party PARTIES
• Actions for possession of immovable property
Contoso 5
S u i t e s
• PARTIES
• Relator actions
• Representative proceedings
• Representation of interested persons who cannot be
ascertained
Contoso 6
S u i t e s
Order 15 Causes of action, counterclaims and parties
Cases
• O15 r 1 : Joinder of causes of action • O 15 r 11 Relator actions
• O 15 r 2: Counterclaim against plaintiff • O 15 r 12 Representative proceedings
• O 15 r 3 : Counterclaim against additional parties • O 15 r 13 Representation of interested persons who
• O 15 r 4 : Joinder of parties cannot be ascertained
Cases
• Goh Hock Hai v EON Bank Bhd [2011] 3 MLJ 189
• AmBank (M) Bhd v New Century Concepts Sdn Bhd
[2012] 7 MLJ 283
• Perdanan Perwira Harta Malaysia v Mohd Baharin bin
Hj Abu [2010]5 MLJ 295
• Kok Wee Kiat v Kula Lumpur Stock Exchange Bhd
[1977] 1 MLJ 109, FC
• Majlis Agama Islam Selangor v Bong Boon Chuen
[2009] 6 MLJ 307
• Dato’ Dr Haji Mohamed Haniffa bin Haji Abdullah v
Koperasi Doktor Malaysia Bhd [2008] 3 CLJ 323,
[2008] 3 MLJ 530, CA
• Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd [1987] AC 189
• Folin & Brothers Sdn Bhd v Wong Foh Ling [2001] 2
MLJ 23 Contoso 8
S u i t e s
Parties
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
• 3.Incorporated bodies
• Section 21 Companies Act 2016
• Section 3(2)Public Trustee Act 1950
• 4.Partnership firms (O.77 ROC)
• 1.Who should be the plaintiff/s or defendant/s:
• a) partnership may sue or be sued in the name of the
• Right to sue in person ,O 5 r 6(1) ROC firm (O.77(1) ROC)
• Body corporate must be represented by a solicitor , • b)advantages of suing a partnership in the firm’s name
• O 5 r 6(2) ROC • c) suing a partnership in contract and tort
• 2.Persons under disability O.76 ROC • 5.Individual trading as a firm (O.77 r.9 ROC)
• a) must sue and defended by litigation rep.,Rules 2(1) • May be sued in his business name but can only sue in
and (2) ROC his name
• b) litigation rep.must file consent (rule 3(7) ROC and • Mallal’s Supreme Court Practice para.77/1/6
Form 188 & act by a solicitor (Rule 2(3) ROC)
• Mason v.Mogridge (1892) 8 TLR 805
• c) costs in suits brought or defended by infants; and
• d) service on persons under disability, rule 14(2)ROC Contoso 9
• S u i t e s
Parties