Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Main HRM .......
Main HRM .......
1.SNEHA PARMAR.
2.ANNU KANDA.
3.PRIYANKA SAMANI
4.DHARTI RANA.
5.PRIYA MISTRY.
6.MEGHA POWAR.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
“Encouragement is the
key to performance.
Reward is even greater
source of encouragement
when it's beyond just
words”
Performance Appraisal in Call
Centre.
Introduction
“Commitment” &
“Effort” from the
employees.
The participative
style:
For eg:
Work teams,
Quality circles &
Regular performance
appraisals.
Meaning
Performance appraisal-
It is a method of evaluating the behaviour of
an employee at the work place, normally including
both quantitative and qualitative aspects of job
performance.
Process of obtaining, analyzing and recording
information about the relative worth of an
employee
Powerful tool to calibrate, refine and reward
the performance of the employee.
Definition
Flippo:
"Performance appraisal is the systematic, periodic
and an impartial rating of an employee’s excellence
in the matters pertaining to his present job and his
potential for a better job."
Focus –
is measuring and improving the actual
performance of the employee and also the future
potential of the employee.
Aim-
is to measure what an employee does.
Aims
Feedback.
Training needs.
Basis for personnel
decisions.
Organizational diagnosis
and development.
Facilitates
communication-
employee &
administration.
To improve performance
through counselling,
coaching and
development.
Objectives
Discussing results
(providing feedbacks) Decision making-taking corrective action
Establishing Performance Standards
Set
Performan
ce
Standards
Performance Level
Days
Communicating the standards to employees
Measuring Actual Performance
Performance Level
Actual Performance
Days
Comparing Actual Performance with Standards decided
Set
Performan
ce
Standards
Performance Level
Actual Performance
Deviation
Days
Discussing Actual Performance
Offering Guidance / Taking Corrective Action
METHODS OF PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
Confidential report
Ranking method
Advt:
Simple to understand
Less expansive
Less time consuming
Disadvt
Highly subjective
Possibility of rater’s
bias
Grading method
Advt:
Judge the
performance of
employees.
Simple & quick.
Disadvt:
Not accurate.
Not applicable in large
organisation.
Graphic Rating Scales
Advt:
Simple & easy to
operate.
Economical &
uniformity.
Disadvt:
Heavy pressure on
rater.
Time consuming as
lot of paper work is
done.
E xa m p le
Factors/ Quantity Quality of integrity initiative
considerations of output output
-Excellent
Very good
Good
Average
Below average
Checklist method
Statements are asked…
Does the employee work best under the
tension?......( )
Does they make mistakes frequently?
…………………….( )
Does he keep ahead of schedule?
……………………………( )
Does he follow the instructions of his
superior?........( )
Critical incident method
Essay method
Modern methods
UNITED STATES
UNITED KINGDOM
NEW ZEALAND
ETHOS
Capture
the
" Voice of
the
Customer "
Career planning
CARE
Employee
centric Ample opportunit
Process training
Conversational
Listening
Time management .
Accent neutralization
SPANCO
SPARSH RESPONDEZ
DOMESTIC
<INDIA>.
INTERNATIONAL
<U.K,USA.>
How is the structure of personnel and HR department?
Attendence.
Ø
ØAttendance
ØService level
•Key parameters tracked and benchmarked
against Service Level .
SERVICE LEVELS.
praisal interview held? How do the appraisers prepare for th
Theappraisals are held in ”Special Rooms” &
@ “Special Day”.
ØThe appraisers are trained & provide with
relevant & correct information regarding the
candidate and his work .
e the
standard performance levels & key performance ar
.
by the employee.
How are the appraisees evaluated?
ØOn their performance.
ØThe quality service they provide to the
customers.
AS, The main crux of our call center is to
provide quality service at minimum cost and
in minimum time.
What are the problems faced?
There may be a chance of biased appraisal
up.
How
is the need for training assessed?
After appraisal process is fully done.
It becomes clear where the appraisee is lacking behind.
How do you follow up?
INDIVIDUAL
GROUP
performance
management system work in your organisation? ope
Open
Quality of Work.
Work is performed neatly and Observations
is accurate. Work is consistent,
thorough and complete.
Outstanding.
Exceeds expectations.
Meets expectations.
Improvement needed.
Unacceptable.
Not applicable.
Job Knowledge.
Understands The Job Observations
Requirement & Has Specific
Content Knowledge Where
Appropriate.
Outstanding.
Exceeds expectations.
Meets expectations.
Improvement needed.
Unacceptable.
Not applicable.
CONCLUSION.