Corporate Governance Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Chapter 10

Corporate Governance

Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson


Definition of corporate governance

 Corporate governance – the set of


mechanisms used
 to manage the relationship among stakeholders
and
 to determine strategic direction and
 control the performance of organizations.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Internal governance mechanisms

 Three internal governance mechanisms


 ownership concentration
 the board of directors
 executive compensation.

 The market for corporate control is the single


external governance mechanism influencing
managers’ decisions and the outcomes
resulting from them.
Copyright © 2008 Cengage
Ownership separation
 Modern corporations
are characterized by an
agency relationship that
is created when one
party (the firm’s
owners) hires and pays
another party (top-level
managers) to use its
decision-making skills.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Separation of ownership and control

 Separation of ownership and control creates


an agency problem when an agent pursues
goals that conflict with principals’ goals.
 Principals establish and use governance
mechanisms to control this problem.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Ownership concentration

 Ownership concentration is based on the


number of large block shareholders and the
percentage of shares they own.
 Institutional investors are an increasingly
powerful force in corporate America and
actively use their positions of concentrated
ownership to force managers and boards of
directors to make decisions that maximize a
firm’s value.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Boards of directors
 In the U.S. and the U.K., a firm’s board of directors
(composed of insiders, related outsiders, and
outsiders) is a governance mechanism expected to
represent shareholders’ collective interests.
 The percentage of outside directors on many boards
now exceeds the percentage of inside directors. The
SOX Act requires outsiders to be more independent
of a firm’s top-level managers compared with
directors selected from inside the firm.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Executive compensation

 Executive compensation – including salary,


bonuses, and long-term incentives - is a
highly visible and often criticized governance
mechanism.
 The firm’s board of directors determines the
effectiveness of the firm’s executive
compensation system.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Corporate control
 While shareholders and boards of directors may
have become more vigilant in their control of
managerial decisions, they are insufficient to govern
managerial behavior in many large companies.
 Therefore, the market for corporate control is an
important governance mechanism.
 Although corporate control is also imperfect, it has been
effective in causing corporations to combat inefficient
diversification and to implement more effective strategic
decisions.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Corporate governances differ
globally
 Corporate governance structures differ in Germany,
Japan, and U.S.
 U.S. historically focused on maximizing shareholder value.
 Employees in Germany took a prominent role as
stakeholders.
 Japanese shareholders played virtually no role until
recently
 Now Japanese firms are being challenged by “activist”
shareholders.
 Internationally, systems in various countries are
becoming increasingly similar.

Copyright © 2008 Cengage


Effective governance mechanisms
 Effective governance mechanisms ensure that the
interests of all stakeholders are served.
 Long-term strategic success results when firms are
governed in ways that permit satisfaction of
 capital market stakeholders (such as shareholders)
 product market stakeholders (such as customers and
suppliers)
 and organizational stakeholders (managerial and non-
managerial employees).
 Effective governance produces ethical behavior in
forming and implementing strategies.
Copyright © 2008 Cengage

You might also like